Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)"
2020 Oct 18
8
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
I've since rebuilt/reconfig'd all parts of my setup from scratch; some good cleanup along the way.
Atm, my entire system for send/recv, store/retrieve, + rules & search is working as I intend. Ok, mostly ...
Except for this accented-character search mystery. I've got a _lot_ of mail with various languages in bodies, so _do_ need to get this sorted.
> On 10/18/20 2:58 PM,
2020 Oct 19
4
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
On 10/19/20 1:18 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
> I would recommend you to redo the tests after correcting the
> configuration. To be doubly sure you can include accented and unique non
> accented text in the same email and search for both. If the non accented
> text is found you know you've searching against the updated index and
> the fact that accented text is not found is not
2020 Oct 19
0
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
> On 19/10/2020 02:49 PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I've since rebuilt/reconfig'd all parts of my setup from scratch; some good cleanup along the way.
>
> Atm, my entire system for send/recv, store/retrieve, + rules & search is working as I intend. Ok, mostly ...
>
> Except for this accented-character search mystery. I've got a
2020 Oct 19
0
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
On 19/10/2020 01:49, PGNet Dev wrote:
>
> I've since rebuilt/reconfig'd all parts of my setup from scratch; some
> good cleanup along the way.
>
> Atm, my entire system for send/recv, store/retrieve, + rules & search
> is working as I intend.? Ok, mostly ...
>
> Except for this accented-character search mystery.? I've got a _lot_
> of mail with various
2020 Oct 19
0
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
On 19/10/2020 17:00, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 10/19/20 1:18 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
>> I would recommend you to redo the tests after correcting the
>> configuration. To be doubly sure you can include accented and unique non
>> accented text in the same email and search for both. If the non accented
>> text is found you know you've searching against the updated index and
2020 Nov 01
2
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed) [proposed patch]
On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
> At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from
> command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search
> I confirm - on my simple config - that search for accented or non
> accented characters works correctly as it does via imap connection.
thx. hopefully it'll get considered for a next
2020 Oct 19
0
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
Am 19.10.20 um 17:00 schrieb PGNet Dev:
>
>
> search in TBird
>
> ????subject: aausdfrhyetdwgyatrdf? => FOUND
> ????body:??? aausdfrhy?tdwgyatrdf? => FOUND
>
> ????subject: aausdfrhyetdwgyatrdf? => FOUND
> ????body:??? aausdfrhy?tdwgyatrdf? => (emtpy)
>
> on header search, I'm _not_ seeing any additional activity in solr.log
If I remember
2020 Oct 31
2
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed) [proposed patch]
On 10/31/20 9:55 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
> I can contribute a patch that solves the segfault. Unfortunately though
> fts search may be more broken than this. It does not give me search
> results, even though I see it querying solr and getting hits.
Thx -- hopefully it moves this in the right direction.
Also on the 'good news' page, it appears there's been some progress on
2020 Oct 31
3
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
On 10/18/20 10:28 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>> doveadm(myuser at example.com): Panic: file mail-storage.c: line 2112 (mailbox_get_open_status): assertion failed: (box->opened)
...
> I can reproduce your problem with the `fts lookup` command. Luckily it's equivalent to running `doveadm search`. I'll open a bug about this.
Can you provide any status on the bug/fix?
Thanks.
2020 Nov 02
2
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed) [proposed patch]
On 11/1/20 10:35 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
> Yes, getting more data about any potential problem would be useful.
>
> Just to clarify: I have a fully working search setup for some time now
> over various dovecot releases, so no patches needed to get it working.
>
> My setup does use fts plugin and fts-solr plugin, but it does not use
> lib-fts functionality (that has many
2020 Nov 02
1
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed) [proposed patch]
> On 01/11/2020 20:35 John Fawcett <john at voipsupport.it> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/11/2020 15:20, PGNet Dev wrote:
> > On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
> >> At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from
> >> command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search
> >> I confirm - on my simple
2020 Oct 18
0
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
On 10/11/2020 4:27 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> I'm running,
>
> dovecot --version
> 2.3.11.3 (502c39af9)
>
> solr -version
> 8.6.3
<snip>
> Attempting to test/debug from from cmd line,
>
> doveadm fts lookup -u myuser at example.com body "tambien"
>
> causes a PANIC
I am a committer on the lucene-solr project. So I know that product
2020 Nov 01
0
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed) [proposed patch]
On 01/11/2020 15:20, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
>> At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from
>> command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search
>> I confirm - on my simple config - that search for accented or non
>> accented characters works correctly as it does via imap
2020 Oct 31
0
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed) [proposed patch]
On 31/10/2020 04:57, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 10/18/20 10:28 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>>> ????doveadm(myuser at example.com): Panic: file mail-storage.c: line
>>> 2112 (mailbox_get_open_status): assertion failed: (box->opened)
> ...
>
>> I can reproduce your problem with the `fts lookup` command. Luckily
>> it's equivalent to running `doveadm search`.
2020 Nov 01
0
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed) [proposed patch]
On 31/10/2020 22:01, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 10/31/20 9:55 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
>> I can contribute a patch that solves the segfault. Unfortunately though
>> fts search may be more broken than this. It does not give me search
>> results, even though I see it querying solr and getting hits.
>
> Thx -- hopefully it moves this in the right direction.
>
> Also on the
2020 Oct 19
1
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
On 10/19/20 8:24 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
> Depending how solr has been setup you could see the logging in the web
> server access log. My access log is where I configured it in
> /var/log/httpd/servername.access_log, yours may be different.
here, not running a standalone webserver/proxy in front of solr.
webui's provided by the built-in.
my solr config atm, includes
2020 Nov 02
1
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed) [proposed patch]
> On 02/11/2020 15:11 PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/2/20 12:44 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > you should try removing use_libfts from your config line and let solr do that part.
>
> sry, i'm a bit confused.
>
> you'd suggested I _add_ it,
>
> https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2020-October/120258.html
>
> > I
2020 Oct 19
1
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
re-reading your mail
...
On 10/18/20 2:58 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> I do not use the fts-solr plugin, because my mail host in AWS does not have enough memory for that.
is it that you're not using the dovecot plugin, but _DO_ have solr search setup? by what method/mean?
or that you're avoiding solr usage altogether?
2020 Oct 19
2
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
On 10/18/20 10:28 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Dovecot FTS tokenization is not done, unless you have `use_libfts` in fts_solr setting, in your case
>
> fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ use_libfts
changing
- fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ soft_commit=yes batch_size=250
+ fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ use_libfts
2020 Oct 19
2
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
On 10/19/20 9:15 AM, Peter wrote:
> If I remember correctly, that is an issue with TB - it only does body serches serverside, regardless of what you request, there should be an entry in their bugzilla, I'm too lazy right now.
this is a very old bug
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tb-enterprise/TuUXyQLBB1o
with leads to a comment from Timo
https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot