similar to: v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)

I've since rebuilt/reconfig'd all parts of my setup from scratch; some good cleanup along the way. Atm, my entire system for send/recv, store/retrieve, + rules & search is working as I intend. Ok, mostly ... Except for this accented-character search mystery. I've got a _lot_ of mail with various languages in bodies, so _do_ need to get this sorted. > On 10/18/20 2:58 PM,

On 10/19/20 1:18 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > I would recommend you to redo the tests after correcting the > configuration. To be doubly sure you can include accented and unique non > accented text in the same email and search for both. If the non accented > text is found you know you've searching against the updated index and > the fact that accented text is not found is not

> On 19/10/2020 02:49 PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I've since rebuilt/reconfig'd all parts of my setup from scratch; some good cleanup along the way. > > Atm, my entire system for send/recv, store/retrieve, + rules & search is working as I intend. Ok, mostly ... > > Except for this accented-character search mystery. I've got a

On 19/10/2020 01:49, PGNet Dev wrote: > > I've since rebuilt/reconfig'd all parts of my setup from scratch; some > good cleanup along the way. > > Atm, my entire system for send/recv, store/retrieve, + rules & search > is working as I intend.? Ok, mostly ... > > Except for this accented-character search mystery.? I've got a _lot_ > of mail with various

On 19/10/2020 17:00, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 10/19/20 1:18 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >> I would recommend you to redo the tests after correcting the >> configuration. To be doubly sure you can include accented and unique non >> accented text in the same email and search for both. If the non accented >> text is found you know you've searching against the updated index and

On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from > command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search > I confirm - on my simple config - that search for accented or non > accented characters works correctly as it does via imap connection. thx. hopefully it'll get considered for a next

Am 19.10.20 um 17:00 schrieb PGNet Dev: > > > search in TBird > > ????subject: aausdfrhyetdwgyatrdf? => FOUND > ????body:??? aausdfrhy?tdwgyatrdf? => FOUND > > ????subject: aausdfrhyetdwgyatrdf? => FOUND > ????body:??? aausdfrhy?tdwgyatrdf? => (emtpy) > > on header search, I'm _not_ seeing any additional activity in solr.log If I remember

On 10/31/20 9:55 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > I can contribute a patch that solves the segfault. Unfortunately though > fts search may be more broken than this. It does not give me search > results, even though I see it querying solr and getting hits. Thx -- hopefully it moves this in the right direction. Also on the 'good news' page, it appears there's been some progress on

On 10/18/20 10:28 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> doveadm(myuser at example.com): Panic: file mail-storage.c: line 2112 (mailbox_get_open_status): assertion failed: (box->opened) ... > I can reproduce your problem with the `fts lookup` command. Luckily it's equivalent to running `doveadm search`. I'll open a bug about this. Can you provide any status on the bug/fix? Thanks.

On 11/1/20 10:35 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > Yes, getting more data about any potential problem would be useful. > > Just to clarify: I have a fully working search setup for some time now > over various dovecot releases, so no patches needed to get it working. > > My setup does use fts plugin and fts-solr plugin, but it does not use > lib-fts functionality (that has many

> On 01/11/2020 20:35 John Fawcett <john at voipsupport.it> wrote: > > > On 01/11/2020 15:20, PGNet Dev wrote: > > On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > >> At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from > >> command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search > >> I confirm - on my simple

On 10/11/2020 4:27 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: > I'm running, > > dovecot --version > 2.3.11.3 (502c39af9) > > solr -version > 8.6.3 <snip> > Attempting to test/debug from from cmd line, > > doveadm fts lookup -u myuser at example.com body "tambien" > > causes a PANIC I am a committer on the lucene-solr project. So I know that product

On 01/11/2020 15:20, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >> At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from >> command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search >> I confirm - on my simple config - that search for accented or non >> accented characters works correctly as it does via imap

On 31/10/2020 04:57, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 10/18/20 10:28 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> ????doveadm(myuser at example.com): Panic: file mail-storage.c: line >>> 2112 (mailbox_get_open_status): assertion failed: (box->opened) > ... > >> I can reproduce your problem with the `fts lookup` command. Luckily >> it's equivalent to running `doveadm search`.

On 31/10/2020 22:01, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 10/31/20 9:55 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >> I can contribute a patch that solves the segfault. Unfortunately though >> fts search may be more broken than this. It does not give me search >> results, even though I see it querying solr and getting hits. > > Thx -- hopefully it moves this in the right direction. > > Also on the

On 10/19/20 8:24 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > Depending how solr has been setup you could see the logging in the web > server access log. My access log is where I configured it in > /var/log/httpd/servername.access_log, yours may be different. here, not running a standalone webserver/proxy in front of solr. webui's provided by the built-in. my solr config atm, includes

> On 02/11/2020 15:11 PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11/2/20 12:44 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > you should try removing use_libfts from your config line and let solr do that part. > > sry, i'm a bit confused. > > you'd suggested I _add_ it, > > https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2020-October/120258.html > > > I

re-reading your mail ... On 10/18/20 2:58 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > I do not use the fts-solr plugin, because my mail host in AWS does not have enough memory for that. is it that you're not using the dovecot plugin, but _DO_ have solr search setup? by what method/mean? or that you're avoiding solr usage altogether?

On 10/18/20 10:28 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Dovecot FTS tokenization is not done, unless you have `use_libfts` in fts_solr setting, in your case > > fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ use_libfts changing - fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ soft_commit=yes batch_size=250 + fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ use_libfts

On 10/19/20 9:15 AM, Peter wrote: > If I remember correctly, that is an issue with TB - it only does body serches serverside, regardless of what you request, there should be an entry in their bugzilla, I'm too lazy right now. this is a very old bug https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tb-enterprise/TuUXyQLBB1o with leads to a comment from Timo https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot