similar to: where to specify dovecot v2.3.11.3 SSL configs for fts solr indexer/backend connection?

On 19/10/2020 16:20, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 10/18/20 10:28 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> Dovecot FTS tokenization is not done, unless you have `use_libfts` in >> fts_solr setting, in your case >> >> fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ use_libfts > > changing > > -??? fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ >

> On 02/11/2020 15:11 PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11/2/20 12:44 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > you should try removing use_libfts from your config line and let solr do that part. > > sry, i'm a bit confused. > > you'd suggested I _add_ it, > > https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2020-October/120258.html > > > I

On 10/18/20 10:28 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Dovecot FTS tokenization is not done, unless you have `use_libfts` in fts_solr setting, in your case > > fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ use_libfts changing - fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ soft_commit=yes batch_size=250 + fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ use_libfts

On 10/11/2020 4:27 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: > I'm running, > > dovecot --version > 2.3.11.3 (502c39af9) > > solr -version > 8.6.3 <snip> > Attempting to test/debug from from cmd line, > > doveadm fts lookup -u myuser at example.com body "tambien" > > causes a PANIC I am a committer on the lucene-solr project. So I know that product

> On 01/11/2020 20:35 John Fawcett <john at voipsupport.it> wrote: > > > On 01/11/2020 15:20, PGNet Dev wrote: > > On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > >> At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from > >> command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search > >> I confirm - on my simple

I'm running, dovecot --version 2.3.11.3 (502c39af9) solr -version 8.6.3 uname -rm 5.8.13-200.fc32.x86_64 x86_64 grep _NAME /etc/os-release PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 32 (Server Edition)" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:32" Solr FTS plugin is enabled/configured, mail_plugins = virtual acl fts fts_solr plugin { fts = solr fts_autoindex = yes

sending to the list as well On 02/11/2020 17:40, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 11/1/20 10:35 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >> Yes, getting more data about any potential problem would be useful. >> >> Just to clarify: I have a fully working search setup for some time now >> over various dovecot releases, so no patches needed to get it working. >> >> My setup does use fts

> On 19/10/2020 02:49 PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I've since rebuilt/reconfig'd all parts of my setup from scratch; some good cleanup along the way. > > Atm, my entire system for send/recv, store/retrieve, + rules & search is working as I intend. Ok, mostly ... > > Except for this accented-character search mystery. I've got a

On 01/11/2020 15:20, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >> At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from >> command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search >> I confirm - on my simple config - that search for accented or non >> accented characters works correctly as it does via imap

On 11/1/20 10:35 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > Yes, getting more data about any potential problem would be useful. > > Just to clarify: I have a fully working search setup for some time now > over various dovecot releases, so no patches needed to get it working. > > My setup does use fts plugin and fts-solr plugin, but it does not use > lib-fts functionality (that has many

On 10/19/20 9:38 AM, Peter wrote: > A network trace will show you, it TB actually requests something for your header search. Might be quicker that was my earlier quick-check ... abs nada from tcpdump -i lo port 8984 on the server, when doing any -- header, body -- TBird search to the server > I would be surprised if that had been fixed in the meantime. heh, sure. the 20 yr old

On 19/10/2020 17:00, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 10/19/20 1:18 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >> I would recommend you to redo the tests after correcting the >> configuration. To be doubly sure you can include accented and unique non >> accented text in the same email and search for both. If the non accented >> text is found you know you've searching against the updated index and

Am 19.10.20 um 18:50 schrieb PGNet Dev: > On 10/19/20 9:38 AM, Peter wrote: >> A network trace will show you, it TB actually requests something for >> your header search. Might be quicker > > that was my earlier quick-check ... > > abs nada from > ?? tcpdump -i lo port 8984 > > on the server,? when doing any -- header, body -- TBird search to the >

On 10/19/20 8:24 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > Depending how solr has been setup you could see the logging in the web > server access log. My access log is where I configured it in > /var/log/httpd/servername.access_log, yours may be different. here, not running a standalone webserver/proxy in front of solr. webui's provided by the built-in. my solr config atm, includes

On 10/19/20 1:18 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > I would recommend you to redo the tests after correcting the > configuration. To be doubly sure you can include accented and unique non > accented text in the same email and search for both. If the non accented > text is found you know you've searching against the updated index and > the fact that accented text is not found is not

On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from > command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search > I confirm - on my simple config - that search for accented or non > accented characters works correctly as it does via imap connection. thx. hopefully it'll get considered for a next

On 13/11/2020 21:32, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 11/13/20 11:37 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >>> still dunno why the 401. :-/ >> >> So I just did a quick check of running dovecot with a standalone >> solr-8.7.0 instance and I'm not seeing any issues. > > +1 > >> I confirm I haven't configured anything for indexer or indexer-worker in >> dovecot, just

On 10/19/20 9:15 AM, Peter wrote: > If I remember correctly, that is an issue with TB - it only does body serches serverside, regardless of what you request, there should be an entry in their bugzilla, I'm too lazy right now. this is a very old bug https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tb-enterprise/TuUXyQLBB1o with leads to a comment from Timo https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot

On 11/13/20 9:46 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >> (1) Can anyone yet verify Doveoct/fts-solr working with solr 8.7.x?>> (2) What logging config in Dovecot gets me more/detailed output for the fts_solr fail? >> (3) Any obvious clues as to what, specifically, is the source of this prob? >> > (1) I can't, I'm still on an earlier version I'll look for the 8.6.3,

re-reading your mail ... On 10/18/20 2:58 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > I do not use the fts-solr plugin, because my mail host in AWS does not have enough memory for that. is it that you're not using the dovecot plugin, but _DO_ have solr search setup? by what method/mean? or that you're avoiding solr usage altogether?