similar to: Dovecot Proxy

Hi Philon, now, it's time for "Mahlzeit" ;-) Sorry, that I read the wiki1 instead of wiki2. I thought the 1 means that it is server one of ... my fault. Also not reading the first line above the menu. My focus was really on the content. ;-) Also my problem with the doc of Dovecot2 proxy is, that the document https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/proxies/

Hi Thoralf, I?d say first of all you should read the current docs for 2.x not the archived stuff. ?> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/ - (It?s even mentioned in bold in the header) Then to front multiple backends perhaps you want to take a look at Dovecot Director. ?> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Director About SMTP I?m not sure why you would want to rely on Dovecot for that. I only do Postfix with

Aki Tuomi wrote in <1907575568.4364.1597984769802 at appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: |> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: ... |> Wietse Venema wrote in |> <4BXSTk189nzJrP3 at spike.porcupine.org>: |> ... |>|Steffen Nurpmeso: |> ... |>|> until SASL says it is done?!. How could EXTERNAL ever work

At one point seems like I found a write up in the Dovecot docs about having Dovecot directly listen on port 25 using Opportunistic TLS along with port 587 authentication, so only Dovecot was required to handle incoming email. Said another way, no requirement for Sendmail, or Postfix or EXIM. Just straight up Dovecot. If I'm remembering correctly, someone point me to the correct docs for

Hi all: I am learning Dovecot step by step. I have enabled the Submission Server, in the hope that I would not need to learn other MTAs like Postfix. The Submission Server is very comfortable: it picks up the existing Dovecot configuration, so that you do not need to configure any user authentication separately. It is working fine on my test setup. My first thought was that, if the recipient

Hi, On 25/05/2020 23:04, Voytek wrote: > jumping here with a question, if I use 143 with STARTTLS, and, force > TLS/SSL in configuration, that's equivalent from security POV, isn't > it? and, same for 110 STARTTLS? Or am I missing something? Interesting point, after some googling, I think you are right, and as long as we have set "disable_plaintext_auth = yes" (and we

Hi Philon, Thanks a lot for your thoughts! Can I ask you if using Solr improved things for you? I have a mailbox with 15 years of e-mail and searching things take a long time. On 04.02.2020 09:39, Philon wrote: > Hi Francis, > > next to fts-solr there was fts-lucene. But that Lucene there seems > heavily outdated why the Dovecot docs also suggest using Solr. > Elasticsearch

Hi, is it possible to hide/restrict access to the home drives of our samba users when accessing them directly via netbios address? I have set up the home folders in ADUC. They are all mapped to drive H: and users have full access to their drive. The problem is, that others users also have access (accept write) to other users folders when opening the domain shares via \\<netbios

> On 21/08/2020 17:56 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: > > > Aki Tuomi wrote in > <1907575568.4364.1597984769802 at appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: > |> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: > ... > |> Wietse Venema wrote in > |> <4BXSTk189nzJrP3 at spike.porcupine.org>: >

Thank you for the reply. I did find imapsync whilst perusing Google. I will give it a shot, it sounds more realistic/reliable. I have a hoard of emails going back to 1999, so I want as few errors as possible :) On 11/7/15 3:31 PM, Philon wrote: > Hi there, > > I was in the same position, but for mutliple accounts. Still you might want to look at imapsync

Hi all, I am quite happily running a dovecot setup with maildirs. This was once running courier but since the migration I have never ever looked back. Now, with growing userbase I?m looking into using zlib compression and mdbox instead of maildir. This seems to go quite well using dsync on a testbed server. So let?s go production! Before final decision I came across this: - I?m using a spam

I'm trying to understand autoexpunge, but the documentation is just not clear. Hopefully, someone can clear up a few questions. http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxSettings says the following: autoexpunge=<time>: (v2.2.20+) Automatically at user deinitialization expunge all mails in this mailbox whose saved-timestamp is older than <time> (e.g. autoexpunge=30d). This removes the

Thanks Philon, I did read the extra bullets, as indicated in my email below. But your "When the user quits and thus closes his mailbox/connection" is more clear than "after the client is already disconnected", since the latter is really anytime, rather than at the time they quit. I can guess that the bulletin about LMTP similarly means at the end of each time LMTP delivers

Bad HTML at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/ <div style="padding: 0.2em; background-color: #50bead"> This documentation is for<strong>Dovecot v2.0</strong>, see<a href="http://wiki1.dovecot.org/ <view-source:http://wiki1.dovecot.org/>">wiki1</a> for v1.x documentation.</a> </div> After "documentation." there is a

Hello, is it possible to use Last Login Plugin with mysql instead of redis ? http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/LastLogin .-- Best regards, Adrian Minta

hi there, running a simple test like time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo hello > world-$s; done takes a little more than a minute on a locally mounted test share on our samba server. the same test finishes in about 5 seconds when it is run on the server's file system, without samba. i understand that dealing with many small files isn't exactly the sweet spot of any (networked) file

I have been using the rgenoud package for a nonlinear least-squares problem with lots of local minima, and it works very well but takes lots of time. According to the article refrenced in the documentation, the original GENOUD-software by the same authors seems to allow for user-supplied analytical derivatives instead of numerical approximations, which would probably save some time. Does anybody

Hi there, I got successfully to replicate my mail server to another dovecot install using dsync, mainly for redundancy, and it works great. I want to try to install fts, as some of the mailboxes have tens of thousands of messages, and it takes minutes to get some results when searching via IMAP on a Roundcube interface. I want to experiment with fts-solr first, and firstly on my redundant

Hello, Because it did not work ? In a similar situation, we where forced to use isync/mbsync in imap to imap mode because dsync did not work. It was reported here more than a year ago (May 2014). Time to time, I see the same report from other trying to use dsync to do a migration to dovecot. Dsync is a very appealing and elegant solution to this usage, but it does not always work in real

Hello, I've been running dovecot for over 3 years now and it works with no problems. I have it setup so that it authenticates users against Active Directory via LDAP and so far no problems. What I would like to know is if there is any way that I could deny access for users trying to access email via cellphones or email clients outside the company. I can