Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Is it possible to only replicate indexes and not the mail data"
2010 Jan 26
2
[inter-pbx commnication] trying to make PBX1 talk to PBX2
Hi All,
i want to make an extension from pbx1 able to tlak to another extension from
pbx2 or use pbx2's trunk to dial outside calls.
so i edited in both servers accordinally the iax.conf:
register => pbx1:pass at 172.16.200.175 <pbx1%3Apass at 172.16.200.175>
[pbx2]
type=friend
host=dynamic
trunk=yes
sercret=pass
context=[default] ; i used the biggest context to avoid confusion as
2016 Dec 14
1
netbios alias and AD trouble
Hello there
I've got two samba servers srv1 and srv2
smb.conf for srv1:
netbios aliases srv1-alias
smb.conf for srv2:
netbios aliases srv2-alias
DNS is configured all right and resolves the names. Each name has got
its own IP address.
Both servers are AD members, run as expected and can be connected to via
their netbios and netbios alias names.
If, for example, srv1 fails I want to add
2017 Sep 27
2
Multiple DC haven't HA on Windows
Hello, thanks for your response.
I'm using samba_internal as DNS because I don't want to add bind to only
relay the internal DNS.
The hosts file is clean on srv2 DC (default localhost), and this is the
srv1 hosts:
192.168.0.251 srv1.domain.com srv1
resolv.conf srv1:
domain domain
search domain.com
nameserver 192.168.0.251
nameserver 8.8.8.8
resolv.conf srv2:
nameserver
2009 Nov 21
3
Connect two Asterisk Server in IAX ?
Hi
My first post get no answer :=<, i post new with new elements.
I have two Asterisk server, running on Asterisk 1.6:
SRV1 = 192.168.0.5 on Asterisk 1.6.1.4
SRV2 = 192.168.0.20 on Asterisk 1.6.1.8
I want create a link for exchange call.
on Srv1:
iax.conf:
[general]
bindport=4569
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
language=fr
bandwidth=low
jitterbuffer=no
forcejitterbuffer=no
autokill=yes
2020 Aug 28
0
Is it possible to only replicate indexes and not the mail data
On 27 Aug 2020, at 15:02, Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote:
> Is it possible to only replicate indexes and not the mail data? (Because
> the data is already on distributed storage)
Does replication re-copy data that is already on the replication server? I don't think it does.
--
"Are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
"I think so, Brain, but I
2003 Jul 10
2
Ldap failover
This is driving me nuts...
I have two LDAP servers working. One primary, one slave. Replication
is working. I have my PDC authenticating against one LDAP server, or
the other. I cannot get it to check the first, if that is unavailable,
then check the second. It basically crashes. Here is the line I am
currently using in smb.conf:
ldap server = srv1.domain.com
This works, as does:
2011 Jan 27
1
libvirtd + vir-manager + kerberos
Hi!
Having two hosts installed with libvirtd, kvm, qemu on (Ubuntu
10.10). Now I have one big problem and one less:
I have set up kerberos for both hosts. Created the principal
"libvirt/srv1.example.org at EXAMPLE.ORG" and
"libvirt/srv2.example.org at EXAMPLE.ORG", Exported the krb5.keytab,
Installed it and tested the servers:
srv1.example.org: I can connect using kerberos
2017 Sep 27
2
Multiple DC haven't HA on Windows
Hello,
I'm trying to replace a Windows Server 2003 DC that has problems, with a
Samba 4 domain with HA.
The linux client server seems to works fine even when main DC/DNS server
fails, but as always, Windows clients not... They are able to log in (maybe
using cached credentials), but the GPO are not being applied...
I've checked the sysvol folder and both are syncsynchronized and
2017 Sep 27
1
Multiple DC haven't HA on Windows
Thanks Rowland.
2017-09-27 17:49 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:05:31 +0200
> Daniel Carrasco via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello, thanks for your response.
> >
> > I'm using samba_internal as DNS because I don't want to add bind to
> > only relay the internal DNS.
2006 Sep 10
2
Possible to have two SAMBA srvs act as one?
Hi,
is it possible to share write locks amongst two samba servers?
We are experiencing performance issues all the time, because one
location (location A) is connected via VPN to the main location
(location B) and needs to access files hosted there on some samba shares.
Now loc A gets its own server, but still files hosted in B need to be
read/write accessed from A and vice versa.
It would be
2020 Jun 11
1
handling spam from gmail.
Yes tell that to the people that create rhel6, rhel7 and rhel8 and give
lts support.
Unless google pays you to train your software to mark their messages as
spam, you might want to consider yourself not to smart as well ;)
My solution would solve the problem others create (see the other mail).
Your solution wastes your time and will always be carrying water to the
sea. I think if 50% of
2017 Nov 15
1
unable to remove brick, pleas help
Hi,
I am trying to remove a brick, from a server which is no longer part of the
gluster pool, but I keep running into errors for which I cannot find
answers on google.
[root at virt2 ~]# gluster peer status
Number of Peers: 3
Hostname: srv1
Uuid: 2bed7e51-430f-49f5-afbc-06f8cec9baeb
State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected)
Hostname: srv3
Uuid: 0e78793c-deca-4e3b-a36f-2333c8f91825
State: Peer in
2013 Jul 22
1
Winbind troubles
I've rolled 2 virtual servers running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and have
installed the SerNet packages. SRV1 has the AD setup and SRV2 is a
member server. I've followed the wiki for both servers to the letter,
and winbind still refuses to grab info on the member server.
I rolled the provision with --use-rfc2307, added a bunch of users with
samba-tool. I then manually created a group and made sure
2001 Nov 28
1
Routing question!!
I have the following system where I'm using Suse 7.1 on the servers:
172.22.2.0/24 172.22.3.0/24 172.22.4.0/24
Clients Clients Clients
Internet Win95 Win95 Win95
| | | |
+----------+ +----------+ +----------+ +----------+
| Srv1 | | Srv2
2018 Oct 12
2
Sieve scripts not replicated
Hello,
I use dovecot replication and the sieve scripts are not replicated. Mail
replication is working fine.
Log when sieve script (with Rainloop webmail) is created:
Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot: managesieve-login: Login:
user=<hativ at example.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=91.67.174.186,
lip=195.201.251.57, mpid=5360, TLS, session=<OXvK9QV4fOBbQ666>
Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot:
2019 Dec 03
4
Account locked and delayed user data propagation...
Mandi! Rowland penny via samba
In chel di` si favelave...
> Do you mean apart from '$((${LOT} + ${LOD}))' should really be
> '$((LOT+LOD))' ?
Apart bashism, this seems not the point:
root at vdcsv1:~# bash -vx /tmp/test
LOT=1
+ LOT=1
LOD=1
+ LOD=1
TMPF=$((${LOT} + ${LOD}))
+ TMPF=2
echo $TMPF
+ echo 2
2
TMPF=$((LOT+LOD))
+ TMPF=2
echo $TMPF
+ echo 2
2007 Jul 10
4
Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP
Hello,
I am trying to join a Samba 3.0.24 server into an ADS domain, which is
served by two Windows 2003 servers (let's say srv1.domain.local (192.168.1.1)
and srv2.domain.local (192.168.1.4)). I am running Samba on a FreeBSD 6.2
machine and I have established an OpenVPN connection to the ADS network
(tunneling). I have this in my resolv.conf:
2019 Nov 24
2
Dovecot proxy with ldap, complains about 'host not given'
My query? Is dovecot not getting this field automatically?
-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: Dovecot proxy with ldap, complains about 'host not given'
On 23 Nov 2019, at 16:11, Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote:
> It looks like the dovecot proxy can authenticate correctly but fails
> then on with this message
>
> Nov 23 23:33:33 test2 dovecot:
2019 Dec 16
1
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
I added this:
passdb {
driver = passwd
skip = authenticated
}
Which enables indeed local delivery, I also noticed this. Maybe the
password field check shoud not be done, when you enable skip
authentication?
Dec 16 10:26:37 svr1 dovecot: auth-worker(12046): Debug: passwd(test):
lookup
Dec 16 10:26:37 svr1 dovecot: auth-worker(12046): passwd(test): invalid
password field '*'
2019 Dec 15
3
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
I receive a local mail when I do a 'mail test' on a backend svr1 with
this[0] configuration. However when I just add only one configuration
change 'lmtp_proxy = yes' I am getting these errors[1]. I would expect
this email to still be delivered locally, should this be working or do I
misunderstand the lmtp proxy functionality?
[0]
passdb {
args =
auth_verbose = default