Displaying 20 results from an estimated 160 matches similar to: "Dovecot search message problem"
2023 Feb 15
2
Van Belle Packages & Samba 4.15
Previously, I needed to downgrade Louis samba packages to Buster's
defaults, which would then be upgraded to 4.13 by the dist-upgrade to
Bullseye. This was on a Domain Member, so didn't touch my DC's or have to
worry about DB format stepping (I hope).
apt install samba=2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u3 python-samba
samba-common=2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u3 samba-common-bin=2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u3
2023 Feb 15
1
Van Belle Packages & Samba 4.15
On 15/02/2023 21:02, Marco Shmerykowsky wrote:
>
> On 2023-02-15 2:13 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>> On 15/02/2023 19:05, Marco Shmerykowsky via samba wrote:
>>> I ran an 'apt-get update' and a 'apt-get upgrade'
>>> samba with the packages referencing Van Belle
>>> site for debian bister samba 415.
>>>
>>> After
2020 Apr 13
2
Unable to set ssl_min_protocol=TLSv1.3
Good $daytime,
as per the recommendations of Mozilla?s SSL config generator[0], I
wanted to set ssl_min_protocol=TLSv1.3 in my dovecot config. This
produced the error:
imap-login: Error: Failed to initialize SSL server context: Unknown
ssl_min_protocol setting 'TLSv1.3'
After some digging, I found the function that parses this setting in
2003 May 28
1
SIP INVITE and ACK go to different ports
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: z
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 24104 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030528/cce0a468/z.obj
2006 Jun 09
2
shutting down a mysql server renders cdr_mysql dead and asterisk nolonger makes or receives calls
At approximately 3:15pm I shut down the office MySQL server to change
out some hardware. Shortly after I received a call from one of two
customers whose asterisk servers output CDR data to that server. They
could not place or receive calls. Shortly after that I received a call
from the other customer. I'm below providing output from the message
log (At debug level). I don't see much
2019 Feb 22
2
new Centos server install yum dependancy error
> Am 22.02.2019 um 22:10 schrieb Voytek Eymont via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>:
>
>
>
> On Sat, February 23, 2019 3:47 am, Gerald Galster via dovecot wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> try: yum clean all
>
>
> Gerald , thank you
>
> it shows in the output after 'second step' below:
>
> # yum clean all
> Loaded plugins:
2019 Feb 22
3
new Centos server install yum dependancy error
Hello Voytek,
the *-devel packages include header files that are only needed if you want to compile something,
they are not needed for running a dovecot server. Likewise the *debuginfo packages, they contain
information that is helpful for debugging dovecot.
Your problem is here:
Error: Package: 2:dovecot-lua-2.3.4.1-1.x86_64 (dovecot-2.3-latest)
Requires: dovecot = 2:2.3.4.1-1
2019 Feb 05
3
Release notify (2.2.36.1 and 2.3.4.1)
Due to DMARC issues some people have failed to receive the latest security information, so here it is repeated for both releases:
2.3.4.1
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.4.1.tar.gz
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.4.1.tar.gz.sig
<https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.2.tar.gz.sig>
Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
* CVE-2019-3814: If
2019 Feb 05
3
Release notify (2.2.36.1 and 2.3.4.1)
Due to DMARC issues some people have failed to receive the latest security information, so here it is repeated for both releases:
2.3.4.1
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.4.1.tar.gz
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.4.1.tar.gz.sig
<https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.2.tar.gz.sig>
Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
* CVE-2019-3814: If
2007 Sep 06
1
openssh 4.6p1 closing connection with strange packet length
server is running openssh 4.6p1 on linux x86 (32bit)
client is running openssh 4.6p1 on linux x86_64 (64bit)
Just connecting from the client to the server and running "top" long
enough results in:
Disconnecting: Bad packet length 3690378913.
This seems like a 32/64 bit problem to me.
--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use robotrap at domdv.de
2019 Feb 05
4
Release notify (2.2.36.1 and 2.3.4.1)
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:32, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Due to DMARC issues some people have failed to receive the latest security
> > information, so here it is repeated for both releases:
> >
> > 2.3.4.1
> >
> >
2019 Feb 05
4
Release notify (2.2.36.1 and 2.3.4.1)
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:32, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Due to DMARC issues some people have failed to receive the latest security
> > information, so here it is repeated for both releases:
> >
> > 2.3.4.1
> >
> >
2019 Feb 05
2
Release notify (2.2.36.1 and 2.3.4.1)
pull the patches from the port.....
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:28 PM Odhiambo Washington via dovecot <
dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
> Oh, so manual compile should NOT work and it's okay or am I missing
> something?
>
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 23:26, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo
2019 Feb 05
2
Release notify (2.2.36.1 and 2.3.4.1)
the patches are already in git master. I've pulled them into the
mail/dovecot port.
The dovecot guys/gals will release it eventually, but the port works TODAY.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:33 PM Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I have always been able to compile manually, even from RCs so I believe I
> should be able to compile from the tarball as well.
>
2019 Feb 05
2
Release notify (2.2.36.1 and 2.3.4.1)
2.3.4 had the same compile issues....
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:44 PM Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Noted.
>
> I will wait for dovecot-2.3.4.2 tarball then.
>
> In all the servers I listed (+2 more), I never use the mail/dovecot port.
>
> I rely on mail/dovecot port on my own prototype (FreeBSD 12) which I have
> built in preparation for the
2019 Feb 22
2
new Centos server install yum dependancy error
Am 22.02.2019 um 14:43 schrieb Voytek Eymont via dovecot:
>
>
> On Sat, February 23, 2019 12:31 am, Gerald Galster via dovecot wrote:
>> Hello Voytek,
>>
>>
>> the *-devel packages include header files that are only needed if you
>> want to compile something, they are not needed for running a dovecot
>> server. Likewise the *debuginfo packages, they
2019 Mar 09
4
sieve vacation to an alias group
Hi,
We have an alias group named xyz at example.com, this alias group has 3 actual
users a at example.com, b at example.com and c at example.com
We set vacation rule on the generic sieve rule, the problem is that 3
responses are sent to the original sender. (obviously because the rule is
being executed with each user in the alias group)
Is it possible to set auto response only once, we tried
2019 Feb 24
2
password protected ssl key seems unsupported after update to 2.3.4.1
Hi,
On a debian server after an update to dovecot to 2.3.4.1 imaps mail client stop working.
I?ve applied necessary migration for ssl_dh (cf https://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.3 <https://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.3> ) but that was not enough. The workaround I?ve setup was to remove password protection from the ssl_key file. All tests with ssl_key_password parameter failled (direct
2019 Feb 22
2
new Centos server install yum dependancy error
> Am 22.02.2019 um 14:43 schrieb Voytek Eymont via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>:
>
>
>
> On Sat, February 23, 2019 12:31 am, Gerald Galster via dovecot wrote:
>> Hello Voytek,
>>
>>
>> the *-devel packages include header files that are only needed if you
>> want to compile something, they are not needed for running a dovecot
>>
2020 Feb 05
2
maildirfolder file created in maildir root during auto-creation with 2.3.4.1 but not 2.2.27
Hello,
as the tin says.
I have several servers running 2.2.27 (Debian stretch) and am adding new
ones with 2.3.4.1 (Debian buster).
The configs were upgraded where needed but neither 10-mail.conf nor
15-mailboxes.conf were changed.
15-mailboxes is all commented out (I guess the default is auto-create,
which isn't documented anywhere I could find) and the only non-comments in
10-mail.conf are