similar to: dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work."

2020 Aug 20
2
dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.
Hello and good evening. Sorry for responding so late, it is midsummer and i spend as much time as possible on the outside (bicycle, mostly). (Just one more day, then 10 degrees colder!!) I Cc: Wietse Venema, because i quote a message of him. (this is "set quote-add-cc" here.) Aki Tuomi wrote in <84881193.5398.1597934431687 at appsuite-dev-gw2.open-xchange.com>: The dovecot
2020 Aug 21
4
[EXT] Re: dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.
Aki Tuomi wrote in <1907575568.4364.1597984769802 at appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: |> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: ... |> Wietse Venema wrote in |> <4BXSTk189nzJrP3 at spike.porcupine.org>: |> ... |>|Steffen Nurpmeso: |> ... |>|> until SASL says it is done?!. How could EXTERNAL ever work
2020 Aug 20
0
dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.
<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 20/08/2020 17:28 Steffen Nurpmeso <<a href="mailto:steffen@sdaoden.eu">steffen@sdaoden.eu</a>> wrote: </div> <div>
2025 Jan 11
1
[PATCH v2] ssh-add: support external parsing of key listing
Jim Knoble wrote in <06004671-E946-4462-9076-5C11D5D46E40 at pobox.com>: |> On Jan 10, 2025, at 11:33, Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: |> Fyi there is the >35 years old BSD sysexits.h that unfortunately |> did not become standardized, but is widely available nonetheless. | |If you mean [this sysexits][*], that doesn't seem great for several \
2020 Aug 21
0
[EXT] Re: dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.
> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: > > > Hello and good evening. > > Sorry for responding so late, it is midsummer and i spend as much > time as possible on the outside (bicycle, mostly). (Just one more > day, then 10 degrees colder!!) > > I Cc: Wietse Venema, because i quote a message of him. > (this is "set
2024 Jul 14
2
Request for a Lockdown option
P.S.: Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20240707025234.j3oUaPFH at steffen%sdaoden.eu>: |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in | <20240704180538.iV4uex29 at steffen%sdaoden.eu>: ||Simon Josefsson wrote in || <87jzi1fg24.fsf at kaka.sjd.se>: |||Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> writes: |||> (And since you mention "port knocking", I'd like to repeat how fond I
2025 Jan 11
1
[PATCH v2] ssh-add: support external parsing of key listing
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20250111031926.AGltefav at steffen%sdaoden.eu>: |Jim Knoble wrote in | <06004671-E946-4462-9076-5C11D5D46E40 at pobox.com>: ||> On Jan 10, 2025, at 11:33, Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: ||> Fyi there is the >35 years old BSD sysexits.h that unfortunately ||> did not become standardized, but is widely available
2024 Jul 07
1
Request for a Lockdown option
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20240704180538.iV4uex29 at steffen%sdaoden.eu>: |Simon Josefsson wrote in | <87jzi1fg24.fsf at kaka.sjd.se>: ||Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> writes: ||> (And since you mention "port knocking", I'd like to repeat how fond I ||> am of upgrading that original concept to a single-packet ||> crypto-armored
2020 Aug 21
0
[EXT] Re: dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.
> On 21/08/2020 17:56 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: > > > Aki Tuomi wrote in > <1907575568.4364.1597984769802 at appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: > |> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: > ... > |> Wietse Venema wrote in > |> <4BXSTk189nzJrP3 at spike.porcupine.org>: >
2025 Jan 10
1
[PATCH v2] ssh-add: support external parsing of key listing
Corey Hickey wrote in <38d76f8e-0744-4bc5-b6e1-db7197e19ad7 at fatooh.org>: |On 2025-01-10 09:57, Jim Knoble wrote: |>> On Jan 9, 2025, at 19:14, Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml at fatooh.org> wrote: |>> |>> To address this, modify ssh-add to: |>> * [...] |>> * exit with a status of 0 instead of 1 |> |> When Damien wrote: |> |>> Adding
2025 Jan 10
1
[PATCH v2] ssh-add: support external parsing of key listing
> On Jan 10, 2025, at 11:33, Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: > > Fyi there is the >35 years old BSD sysexits.h that unfortunately > did not become standardized, but is widely available nonetheless. If you mean [this sysexits][*], that doesn't seem great for several reasons: 1. "A few programs exit with the following non-portable error codes. Do not
2024 Jul 04
1
Request for a Lockdown option
Simon Josefsson wrote in <87jzi1fg24.fsf at kaka.sjd.se>: |Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> writes: |> (And since you mention "port knocking", I'd like to repeat how fond I |> am of upgrading that original concept to a single-packet |> crypto-armored implementation like fwknop.) | |I am reluctantly considering to use some kind of port knocking
2024 Jul 14
1
Request for a Lockdown option
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20240714024434.vvSRh10_ at steffen%sdaoden.eu>: ... |[.]do not |know about the AI_V4MAPPED flag[.] I have read https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-01 but as an application developer i find it ugly not to be able to "simply do it", and get back a mapped address. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer,
2023 Feb 20
1
fseek/fgetc puzzle
Darren Tucker wrote in <CALDDTe39k4UFJWBvts5HWbbhHO+Vw9OAP0zBhu-Hje-2aR9+xA at mail.gmail.com>: J?rg Schilling convinced me in 2017 Readd removed fflush()/fseek() in between read and write.. The behave:record_a_resend-2 test failed on Solaris 5.10 and 5.11, messages in *record* where separated by four \n / U+000A instead of two. It turns out that the effective sequence
2018 Aug 21
2
Call for testing: OpenSSH 7.8
Hi Damien, Damien Miller wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:04:41PM +1000: > ok, djm@ Thanks for checking, and thanks to Val and Michael for testing. I just committed the patch to OpenBSD, others will likely take care of merging it to -portable. > (I'd prefer the comment before the return statement, but up to you) Immediately before the return statement, it looked really confusing,
2020 Mar 12
2
[PATCH 0/1] *** SUBJECT HERE ***
On 12.03.20 19:09, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 21:39 +0100, Thomas Koeller wrote: > IMO, the idea itself sounds not the best... one must assume that such > invoked programs are not written "safe"... and thus an attacker could > potentially cause the system to run such programs a huge number of > times. As the anticipated action of the program is
2024 Jul 15
1
Request for a Lockdown option
Gert Doering wrote in <ZpUvZQr0T-vOToo2 at greenie.muc.de>: |On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:25:46AM +0100, Brian Candler wrote: |> On 14/07/2024 03:49, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-\ |>> harmful-01 |>> |>> but as an application developer i find it ugly not to be able to |>>
2002 Feb 03
1
[wietse@porcupine.org: Re: syncronous directory operation for linux (ext2)]
There's a big thread about filesystems on postfix-users@postfix.org Could you shed some light on that issue? ----- Forwarded message from Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org> ----- From: wietse@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 07:53:26 -0500 (EST) To: Lawrence Greenfield <leg+@andrew.cmu.edu> Cc: Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org>,
2024 Jul 15
1
Request for a Lockdown option
Hi, On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:25:46AM +0100, Brian Candler wrote: > On 14/07/2024 03:49, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > I have read > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-01 > > > > but as an application developer i find it ugly not to be able to > > "simply do it", and get back a mapped address.
2020 Sep 08
3
[PATCH 0/5] ZSTD compression support for OpenSSH
On 2020-09-07 11:21:13 [+1000], Darren Tucker wrote: > The zstd part would be a larger discussion because we would need to > either carry it as a Portable patch or have zstd added to OpenBSD > base, and I don't know if that would be accepted. Do you have any > performance numbers for zstd in this application? A key stroke is here 10 bytes of raw data which zstd compresses usually