similar to: Tests failing on CentOS 6

On 15. Aug 2020, at 14.18, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > > Getting this when attempting to build 2.3.11.3 on CentOS 6: > > test-mail-cache.c:176: Assert failed: strcmp(str_c(str),"123\nfoo\n456\nbar\n") > "" != "123 > foo > 456 > bar > " > test-mail-cache.c:176: Assert failed:

It seems that the behavior of readLines() in R 3.5 has changed for non-blocking pipeline. Consider the following R script, which reads from STDIN line by line. ``` con <- file("stdin") open(con, blocking = FALSE) while (TRUE) { ? ? txt <- readLines(con, 1) ? ? if (length(txt) > 0) { ? ? ? ? cat(txt, "\n", file = stdout()) ? ? } ? ? Sys.sleep(0.1) } close(con) ```

Hi, I am using RedCloth (3.0.4). First using online text2html (http://www.textism.com/tools/textile/) , "123 456" returns <p>123<br />456</p> But by code: <code> require ''RedCloth'' puts RedCloth.new("123\n456").to_html </code> I got: <p>123 456</p> CR is not taken in consideration. Is there any parameter I am

The issue is that readLines() tries to seek (for reasons I don't understand) in the non-blocking case, but silently fails for "stdin" since it's a stream. This confused the buffering logic. The fix is to mark "stdin" as unable to seek, but I do wonder why readLines() is seeking in the first place. Anyway, I'll get this into patched ASAP. Thanks for the report.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11656 Bug ID: 11656 Summary: Escaping broken with --files-from Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

Dear Dressers of RedCloth, I have a question: text = "Foo\nBar\n\nBaz" RedCloth.new(text, [ :hard_breaks ]).to_html # => "<p>Foo<br />Bar<br />\nBaz</p>" Shouldn''t that really be "<p>Foo<br />Bar</p><p>Baz</p>"? So long, -- Christoffer Sawicki

What is a good way to enter a very long model formula. For example: y ~ Input.2 + Input.3 + ... + Input.1000 (assuming the corresponding dataframe has many other columns). Is there a way to convert a character string to a formula? Are there command line expansions in R besides the simple '.'? Thanks. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all. We have a win32 application linked to Far Point's Spread32 library; the application crashes when referencing a NULL pointer returned by GlobalLock, but obviously it runs perfectly under win98SE (see previous post about GetWindowLongA) . The behaviour of SCROLL_GetPtrScrollInfo, with nBar parameter = SB_CTL, is to return wndPtr->wExtra as it were a pointer. Actually we found that,

Probably related to the switch to buffered connections. I will look into this soon. On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Randy Lai <randy.cs.lai at gmail.com> wrote: > It seems that the behavior of readLines() in R 3.5 has changed for non-blocking pipeline. > > > Consider the following R script, which reads from STDIN line by line. > ``` > con <- file("stdin")

I suspect the reason for the seek is this: cat("1\n", file = "foobar") f <- file("foobar", blocking = FALSE, open = "r") readLines(f) #> [1] "1" cat("2\n", file = "foobar", append = TRUE) readLines(f) #> [1] "2" cat("3\n", file = "foobar", append = TRUE) readLines(f) #> [1]

Hi, Earlier this year I "upgraded" from wine 20010510 to 20011226 in order to see if some kind of resource leak was fixed which caused screen redraws to get progressively slower and slower and slower and slower, .... That was fixed but there seemed to be a significant number of graphics and UI regressions. I've just upgraded to 20020228 to see if things were any better and within

Hi, 1. I want 95% not 99% confidence intervals in my summary.Design plot using the Design package. Putting conf.int=.95 as an argument in plot does not work. The default appears to be .99 not .95 as stated in the package Design manual (p. 164). 2. My sweave chuck is below and my output is attached as well as linked here: http://www.sonoma.edu/users/s/stanny/330A/project/ciplot.pdf 3.

I have two CentOS5 systems server1 and server2. There is user peter on server1 who can ssh to server2 using public ssh keys and no password is needed. What I noticed is that running remote ssh commands in bash script breaks while loops. ====== #!/bin/sh for i in server2 server2; do echo "--> Start" ssh peter@$i ls echo "--> END" done echo " server2

Hi Josh, I got a new computer yesterday, a 64bit intel core 2 duo. I am running the amd64 port of Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy). I compiled flac-1.1.3 beta and had trouble encoding: dave@jimmy:/tmp$ ./bin/flac -o /tmp/foo.flac foo.wav ----------------- flac 1.1.3-beta2, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006 Josh Coalson flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you

Hi- I''m working in the IT department of a small liberal arts university-- we''re getting *massacred* by P2P traffic. Informal testing/probing indicates that about 60% of our traffic from the dorms was P2P-- we''ve taken the initial step of hardlimiting the dorms to no more than 40% of outgoing university bandwidth. Also, we''ve blocked the

I would like to make bar plots where the bars are composed of text like this: http://www.thomaslevine.com/lowres/text_bars.png Is there a package that will help me with this? Thanks Tom

Just as an example, I picked totally at random, one c++ program to run the google code style checker. There are clearly some valid points it found. I think it would good to start to adapt this tool or write a new tool to do style checking and to start to better formalize the llvm rules. I ran it against Target/Target.cpp Target.cpp:0: No copyright message found. You should have a line:

On 05.06.2012 02:56, reed kotler wrote: > Just as an example, I picked totally at random, one c++ program to run > the google code style checker. > > There are clearly some valid points it found. I think it would good to > start to adapt this tool > or write a new tool to do style checking and to start to better > formalize the llvm rules. > > I ran it against

Did you agree with the comment about the use of long long from the tool? Anyway, it's not really important to me that we adopt any specific google code rules over the current llvm rule. The point is to that Google has a deeper set of conventions and it would be a good starting point for us. Also, they have a tool which checks a lot of this. The lack of a tool for llvm style check is what