similar to: Dovecot serving incorrect certificate

CORRECTION: Just discovered that actually the Postfix cert is being sent to the client regardless of the configuration?so now the remaining question is why would is the PF cert sent rather than the cert I have configured in the dovecot.conf file? > On Jul 25, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Antonio Leding <tech at leding.net> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have a Dovecot (v2.3.10.1) +

On 2020-07-25 23:31, Antonio Leding wrote: > CORRECTION: > > Just discovered that actually the Postfix cert is being sent to the > client regardless of the configuration?so now the remaining question > is why would is the PF cert sent rather than the cert I have > configured in the dovecot.conf file? Because the file containes the wrong certificate. -- Christian Kivalo

> Because the file containes the wrong certificate. We must be miscommunicating? The file that is configured in Postfix is being sent to the client..NOT the file cfg?d in Dovecot? Prior to enabling TLS in Postfix, this exact same config worked fine... > On Jul 25, 2020, at 2:35 PM, Christian Kivalo <ml+dovecot at valo.at> wrote: > > > > On 2020-07-25 23:31,

We are pleased to release v2.3.10.1 Please find it from locations below: https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.10.1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.10.1.tar.gz.sig Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ Docker images in https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot Aki Tuomi Open-Xchange oy --- - CVE-2020-10957: lmtp/submission: A client can crash the server by

We are pleased to release v2.3.10.1 Please find it from locations below: https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.10.1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.10.1.tar.gz.sig Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ Docker images in https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot Aki Tuomi Open-Xchange oy --- - CVE-2020-10957: lmtp/submission: A client can crash the server by

Hello all? First, a disclaimer?I am aware that this is very likely not a Dovecot related issue but I am truly pulling whatever hair I have left out of my head and given the brain-power of this mailer, I thought someone might know what is going in here. The issues is this? I check the message counts for a given account using doveadm and get a given number. I then configure the same account in 3

Hi John, Thanks a million for your insight. I believe this is the thread to which you refer: https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2019-October/117219.html <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2019-October/117219.html> > On Jul 30, 2020, at 5:48 AM, John Stoffel <john at stoffel.org> wrote: > >>>>>> "Antonio" == Antonio Leding <tech at

************* eManager Notification ************** Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. Destination mailbox(es): "samba@samba.org" ******************* End of message ******************* -------------- next part -------------- Received: from 208.8.92.167 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:55:27 -0400 Received: from

Agreed? Is Mailmate an option for you? > On Aug 10, 2020, at 7:51 PM, John Stoffel <john at stoffel.org> wrote: > > > Antonio> Thanks a million for your insight. I believe this is the thread to which you refer: > > Antonio> https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2019-October/117219.html > > Yes, that's the thread. It looks like it's an Apple

I seem to recall a post a while back where, due to the age of the remote end, the remote side command had to be entered in the command executed on the local side. Do you have dsync on the 2.0.9 machine? > On Jul 27, 2020, at 4:16 PM, Kishore Potnuru <kishore.reachme at gmail.com> wrote: > > This is what my understanding. May be I am also wrong here. > > Backup option

Hi! Kishore, you got the command wrong.. `doveadm backup -R -u username-goes-here imapc:` for this to work, you need to configure following things: imapc_host = old-host-name imapc_password = master-password imapc_master_user = master-user-name and on the old host you need passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/passwd.masterusers driver = passwd-file master = yes pass = yes } This should

On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 11:08:08PM +0300, Gavin White wrote: > > Because the aren't many users here, the list is not monitored, > no rules... I guess IceCast as not as big as I thought... and > infested by bunch of lamers that like to take advantage of it > to advertise. > Since it is Sunday and I am in a good mood, I will presume from your languague and attitude that you

Well that option set still doesn?t look correct? Here is the doveadm option set from my 2.2.2 server which is several weeks\months before 2.2.36? [Jul-27 @ 15:25:09 ] > dovecot --version 2.2.2 [Jul-27 @ 15:26:53 ] > ls -l /usr/local/bin/doveadm -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1379203 May 22 2013 /usr/local/bin/doveadm [Jul-27 @ 15:25:12 ] > doveadm usage: doveadm [-Dv] [-f

Fair enough but the command snippet I posted was taken directly from your earlier post dated Mon Jul 27 23:11:06 EEST 2020 and it does say ?production1??I just double-checked as well... FWIW?the server order in the command you just pasted is the exact reverse from the Jul 27th post I mentioned above? Here you appear to be exec?ing the command on prod2 and trying to pull from the remote of prod

Hello, I am seeing duplicate mailboxes when I perform the ?doveadm mailbox list? command?the output is as follows: ================= INBOX INBOX.Drafts INBOX.Trash INBOX.Sent INBOX.INBOX INBOX.INBOX.Sent Messages INBOX.INBOX.Drafts INBOX.INBOX.Trash INBOX.INBOX.Deleted Messages ================= Here is namespace config that seems to have caused the above duplicates. Please help me

Hi, I'm testing: $ sudo nsd-control status version: 4.0.1 verbosity: 2 I found a loop problem with this record: * IN CNAME none ("none" means no matching record in zone and therefore match * again) Queries that use "* CNAME" will result in a loop. The response will use TCP and will be limited to 65k bytes $ dig @127.0.0.1 sdfgsfg.test.com ;; Truncated,

Hello there, Since the update with ruby all my puppet function is dead (well known issue with the cert) . There has been some discutions on the dev list on how to patch this for future versions. I have read the list and wondered how we can solve the issue while waiting for the .24. I am in beta test of the .23.x version but on my production system i wanted to find a way to solve this now

On 2020-05-18 13:03, Aki Tuomi wrote: > We are pleased to release v2.3.10.1 Please find it from locations > below: > > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.10.1.tar.gz > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.10.1.tar.gz.sig > Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ > Docker images in https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot Those binary packages and

hi again. after some tests, (on my operational domain and on a new testdomain) i detected this behavior: on samba 4.11.6 sometimes the new DNS-records finisches on a wrong dns zone. the problem occurs, if more then 5 records are created with the same name in more then one domain zone for example: testa1.jupiter.mydom.org testa2.jupiter.mydom.org testa3.jupiter.mydom.org

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Markus Mayer <mmayer at broadcom.com> wrote: > Call strtolower() rather than walking the string explicitly to convert > it to lowercase. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer at broadcom.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c | 7 +------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git