similar to: Stuck here - help please

Il 16/07/20 12:40, Gerald Galster ha scritto: >> Some missing infos... >> >> - As load balancer I'm using a pair of keepalived with simple setup and >> not the DNS >> - Load balancer algorithm is "Weighted Least-Connection" >> - About 20 domains and 3000 email >> - I'm monitoring my backend servers with poolmon >> - The backend

Thank you for the reply. I have done the sync manually with "doveadm sync" command. But, I have not configured the replication yet. I am looking at the below webpage for the replication. https://wiki.dovecot.org/Replication I am using the dovecot version "2.2.36". I am confused with what needs to be done after reading that page. 1. They are talking about v2.3.1 and v2.2+.

> I have 2 test servers with the below configuration. > > ========================== > Linux OS - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > Dovecot version - 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63) > Postfix version - 2.10.1 > ========================== > > Trying to create High Availability. > > I have added both of the above servers behind a F5 load

Hi All, I have tried the below command to migrate the data from the old server(dovecot version: 2.0.9) to new servers(dovecot version: 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63)). But it's throwing an error. old server name: production1 new server1 name: production2 (for HA/Replication) new server2 name: production3 (for HA/Replication) I have configured replication between production2 and production3, which is

Thank you all for replies!!! Some missing infos... - As load balancer I'm using a pair of keepalived with simple setup and not the DNS - Load balancer algorithm is "Weighted Least-Connection" - About 20 domains and 3000 email - I'm monitoring my backend servers with poolmon - The backend servers are virtual machine (vmware) with datastore on "all flash" storage based

Thank you for the response. So, both password files (master and regular user credentials) have the same contents in this scenario, correct? -Kishore On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:42 PM Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2020, Kishore Potnuru wrote: > > > =============== > > Jul 28 11:14:23 auth: Fatal: Master passdb can't have pass=yes if there

Thank you for the reply. In old server (production1), I have changed like this for passdb. rest all i kept the same. passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/master-users driver = passwd-file master = yes #pass = yes } passdb { driver = passwd-file args = username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/passwd } Now I am getting the below Authentication error from

Hi Gerald, Thank you for the details. As per your suggestion, I have made the changes to dovecot.conf file. Still I don't see any replication is happening. Please see the dovecot.conf file. I do not see "/etc/dovecot/conf.d/12-replication.conf" in my servers. So I had put everything in the dovecot.conf file only. Please see the complete data in it below. The below data is in

I'm getting strange timeouts occasionally on Dovecot 1.0.rc15 on Debian 4.0, and haven't been able to figure out the cause. $ ./src/imaptest user=test%d at imaptest.com host=localhost pass=foo mbox=~/dovecot-crlf - select=0 Logi Logo 100% 100% 2 4 7/ 10 0 0 10/ 10 0 0 10/ 10 0 0 10/ 10 0 0 10/ 10 0 0 10/ 10 0 0 10/ 10 0 0

Now that I have a working kvm setup, I thought I'd finally try how Zimbra works. This is mainly some microbenchmarking, so it may not have much to do with actual performance in real life. Setup: - 1GB memory given to kvm (from host's 2GB) - Intel Core 2 6600 (kvm uses only one CPU) - CentOS 5 - 15GB qcow2 image on XFS filesystem - Zimbra 5.0 RC2 RHEL5 x86_64 - Dovecot latest hg,

imaptest host=mail04.local port=143 user=xxx pass=xxx mbox=test.mbox [Fri Jan 11 15:09:14 2019] imaptest[7634]: segfault at 1354ff0 ip 0000000001354ff0 sp 00007ffed5d8f558 error 15 [Fri Jan 11 15:09:22 2019] imaptest[7635]: segfault at 2267ff0 ip 0000000002267ff0 sp 00007ffee5890308 error 15 [Fri Jan 11 15:10:47 2019] imaptest[7648]: segfault at 10e6ff0 ip 00000000010e6ff0 sp 00007ffedbb19f98

Please, unsubscribe me. I really don't want to read this. 12.01.2019 22:47, Stephan Bosch ?????: > > Op 11/01/2019 om 15:13 schreef Marc Roos: >> imaptest host=mail04.local port=143 user=xxx pass=xxx mbox=test.mbox >> >> [Fri Jan 11 15:09:14 2019] imaptest[7634]: segfault at 1354ff0 ip >> 0000000001354ff0 sp 00007ffed5d8f558 error 15 >> [Fri Jan 11 15:09:22

I thought I'd try benchmarking with dbmail (v2.2.4) to see how much slower a SQL backend could actually be. Skip to bottom for the conclusions. Originally I ran the tests with the databases being in XFS filesystem. MySQL's performance was horrible. It went 3-7x faster with ext3. MySQL 5.0.30 backend (innodb): ./imaptest clients=1 - append=100 seed=1 secs=30 msgs=1000000 logout=0

While trying to use imaptest (-20100922, from http://dovecot.org/nightly/imaptest/imaptest-latest.tar.gz) with the included tests directory, it assert-crashes after a suspicious connect() failure: $ ./imaptest user=foo pass=bar host=localhost test=tests Error: connect() failed: No route to host Panic: file test-exec.c: line 903 (test_send_lstate_commands): assertion failed:

http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest/ <http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest/> I am doing imap testing using imaptest scripts. But, i am unable to append message. APPEND INBOX "15-Jun-2015 05:30:05 -0700" "From:abc at gmail.com" "Subject: test. HI this is msg". This command i am using in my testing script. Command executed properly. But, it is not appending mail

dovecot-1.1.beta16]# gcc imaptest.c -o imaptest -g -Wall -W -I. -Isrc/lib-mail -Isrc/lib -Isrc/lib-imap -Isrc/lib-storage/index/mbox -DHAVE_CONFIG_H src/lib-storage/index/mbox/mbox-from.o src/lib-imap/libimap.a src/lib-mail/libmail.a src/lib/liblib.a imaptest.c: In client_append function: imaptest.c:1492: error: too many arguments for i_stream_create_limit function

Hello, I download and install it manual, this working now? waiting for next update to found out, yum is working correct again ;-) Thanks for answers, Am Sonntag, 31. M?rz 2019, 13:59:17 CEST schrieb Kostya Vasilyev via dovecot: > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019, at 2:30 PM, G?nther J. Niederwimmer via dovecot wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Am Samstag, 30. M?rz 2019, 21:36:12 CEST schrieb

Dear Folks, Using head of imaptest with dovecot 2.1, I am attempting to put a heavy load on the server, with insufficient success. I made 15000 user accounts, put them in to a file, one per line. Then I ran imaptest with ./imaptest userfile=../../imap-test-userlist-15001.txt clients=15001 pass=SECRETPASSWORD But CPU load is only reaching 20. I put an mbox containing 67 messages into

Yes dovecot is showing the inserted messages until the stall. Looks like it is an issue with imap test because I am able to empty the mailbox again via thunderbird. I am comparing write tests to different backends. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Miller [mailto:dmiller at amfes.com] Sent: dinsdag 17 september 2019 22:06 To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re: Imaptest stall On 9/17/2019

Hey guys, Has anybody ever used imaptest to benchmark *ONLY* reads? I'm trying to run a battery of tests in my new cluster and apparently no combination of parameters works, because fetch instruction doesn't run. Below is the command I'm using and its partial output imaptest/src/imaptest host=$SERVER_IP port=143 user=teste%d at example%d.com pass=$TEST_PASS users=10 domains=10