similar to: POP3Deleted flag issues

> On 08/07/2020 22:24 Justina Colmena ~biz <justina at colmena.biz> wrote: > > > On July 8, 2020 11:01:20 AM AKDT, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > >Am 08.07.2020 um 20:28 schrieb Kishore Potnuru: > >> Thank you for the reply. > >> > >> As per our current infrastructure, I can go maximum of the redhat 7.7 > >>

Hi Aki, Am I able to install (2.3 version) on RHEL 6.10 or RHEL 7.7 versions? Will there be any issues? I know RHEL 6.10 is out of support in November. But I want to understand and try in my test environment. Is it possible? thanks, Kishore On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:40 AM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > > On 08/07/2020 22:24 Justina Colmena ~biz <justina

On July 8, 2020 11:01:20 AM AKDT, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: >Am 08.07.2020 um 20:28 schrieb Kishore Potnuru: >> Thank you for the reply. >> >> As per our current infrastructure, I can go maximum of the redhat 7.7 >> version. Not more than that. Am I able to install or upgrade to >dovecot 2.3 >> version in redhat 7.7? I am running

Something I can't quite place finger on here. Altogether too much Mafia, in the bulk email business generally, and I know Switzerland borders on Italy ... This sounds, (albeit vaguely,) altogether too much like the thieves I seem to have fallen amongst lately. Two stolen trucks, three stolen laptops, another one wrecked, three or four stolen cell phones, passwords GPG keys, city hall hookers

GMail doesn't delete mails when POP3 client issues a DELE command for it. Instead they just become invisible for future POP3 sessions, but they still exist for IMAP/webmail. The same could be implemented pretty easily for Dovecot: - Add a new setting to enable this: pop3_deleted_flag = $POP3Deleted - When DELEting a message, add this flag to the message. - When listing messages, skip all

Hi, I am investigating the use of dovecot for a voicemail storage system (which is effectively a SMTP/POP3 system), which we want to use replication to give us some resilience. Tests have mostly been on dovecot 2.3.8 (9df20d2db) - as packaged on Centos 8 - but I have also used a couple of similar versions on different platforms, so this is not a specific build problem. The platform has

It turns out that if I enable this option: pop3_deleted_flag = "$POP3Deleted? The issue no longer persists. I have to manually expunge the kept mails that have been deleted via pop3 though: doveadm expunge mailbox INBOX KEYWORD '$POP3Deleted' -A Wolfgang > On 21 Jun 2015, at 21:05, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote: > > FWIW I just tried the sdbox

I would like to update one of the websites on my server from Joomla 1.5 to Joomla 3.2, but it wants PHP 5.3. I am currently using IUS's php52 5.2.17, which is fine for the Joomla 1.5 and the various WordPress sites (up to 3.9) currently served on this server. I plan to test the update procedure on my home (test) system (a pretty much identically setup system) before possible breaking my

Hi, I am running CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core) and have enabled both epel and ius repository - ius-release-2-1.el7.ius.noarch - epel-release-7-14.noarch IUS not pulling the latest PHP packages. I have ran yum clean metadata and yum clean all commands but no luck. The latest version is *7.4.33* # php -v PHP 7.4.30 (cli) (built: Jun 10 2022 16:22:42) ( NTS ) Copyright (c) The PHP

Hello, looking at the metadata for EPEL and IUS, neither seem to carry PHP 7.4. It is EOL anyway, so you should migrate to PHP 8. To find out where your current PHP comes from try something like: # rpm -qf /usr/bin/php # rpm -qi php I would recommend you switch to Remi's repo and upgrade to PHP 8: https://rpms.remirepo.net/ Kind regards, Steve Am 26.05.2023 12:50, schrieb Kaushal

Hi Ashish, Which CentOS version you using? > If it is CentOS 6 then instead of building it from source, you can use IUS > repo which has latest php packages. > Below is the link for the packages in IUS repo for CentOS 6. > <http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/6/x86_64/repoview/> > I'm using CentOS 7. I'll check to see if I can get php version 5.6.7

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 1:03 AM Jyrki Tikka <jyrki.tikka at iki.fi> wrote: > > >I wanted to update my CentOS 7 install this morning and I > started>getting the errors from below. > >Any ideas on a fix? > Certainly! > >Error: Package: python34-xapps-overrides-1.0.4-13.el7.x86_64 (@epel) > > Requires: xapps(x86-64) = 1.0.4-13.el7 > >

I need to upgrade PHP because the latest WordPress requires one at least at 5.2.4. What are the tradeoffs of using the php53 packages provided by CentOS versus IUS? I've seen that installing the RHEL-derived php53 requires removing php first and it creates package conflicts because it doesn't provide a virtual php-common package. That suggests I should install the IUS package. Is

Greetings In the attempt to upgrade the technology stack on CentOS 5 from stock PHP to PHP53 I have made some progress. Much thanks to all respondents, especially Jesus. One repository that provides a complete set of builds and seems to fulfill both PHP and PHP53 requirements is the IUS one: http://iuscommunity.org/ Repos here: http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/5/i386/repoview/

>>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius writes: > But this might require a more detailed investigation. For example I > just noticed that even with the patch `@` is still not listed in > .S3_methods_table(). Afaict base does not register any methods for @ or @<- ? -k > KK. >> On Apr 29, 2023, at 4:44 PM, Karolis Koncevi?ius <karolis.koncevicius at gmail.com> wrote:

Does anyone know if PHP 7.3 is coming to the IUS repo soon? I'd rather upgrade from 7.2 than tear out IUS and replace with Remi. -- -- Steve

But this might require a more detailed investigation. For example I just noticed that even with the patch `@` is still not listed in .S3_methods_table(). KK. > On Apr 29, 2023, at 4:44 PM, Karolis Koncevi?ius <karolis.koncevicius at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Kurt, > > With r84341 it now works on my side. > > Warm regards, > Karolis K. > >> On Apr 29,

>>>>> Martin Maechler >>>>> on Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:20:47 +0100 writes: >>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius >>>>> on Mon, 9 Dec 2019 23:43:36 +0200 writes: >> So I tried adding Infinity support for all cases. And it >> is (as could be expected) more complicated than I >> thought. > "Of course

Hello Kurt, With r84341 it now works on my side. Warm regards, Karolis K. > On Apr 29, 2023, at 1:24 PM, Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik at wu.ac.at> wrote: > >>>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius writes: > > Can you pls try again with r84341 or later? > > Best > -k > >> A more concrete example in order to correct my vague messages below. >> Writing

>>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius writes: Can you pls try again with r84341 or later? Best -k > A more concrete example in order to correct my vague messages below. > Writing an R package that uses `@` and `@<-` as S3 generics. Line from manual pages in .Rd files: > \method{@}{newclass}(object, name) <- value > Throws this error during R CMD check ?as-cran >