similar to: Bug[?]report: duplicate response

Hi, I just updated my Dovecot to the new build in Fedora 26, which is based on 2.2.31. After I did that, Evolution (3.24.3) is no longer receiving notifications about new mail in folders other than inbox (the same version of Evo that worked fine against Dovecot 2.2.30.2). The only folder that still gets notifications is inbox. I see there have been changes to NOTIFY code in this release. What

On 29 Jun 2017, at 13.27, Bojan Smojver <bojan at rexursive.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I just updated my Dovecot to the new build in Fedora 26, which is based > on 2.2.31. After I did that, Evolution (3.24.3) is no longer receiving > notifications about new mail in folders other than inbox (the same > version of Evo that worked fine against Dovecot 2.2.30.2). The only

Quoting RFC 5465 (NOTIFY): ?If the NOTIFY command enables MessageNew, MessageExpunge, AnnotationChange, or FlagChange notifications for a mailbox other than the currently selected mailbox, and the client has specified the STATUS indicator parameter, then the server MUST send a STATUS response for that mailbox before NOTIFY's tagged OK. [?] If either AnnotationChange or

http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2-notify/ contains the initial implementation of IMAP NOTIFY extension. It's less than half-working, but the difficult part of it is done I think. If I give it a command like: x notify set (personal (messagenew messageexpunge flagchange)) and then in another session I copy a message to another mailbox, it sends: * STATUS "foobar" (MESSAGES 77

Hi there, There seem to be a race condition in IMAP NOTIFY: when two events for the SELECTED mailbox are received soon after one another, sometimes only the first one is being reported to clients that enabled IMAP NOTIFY. On closer look it seems like this is most often reproducible when the delay between the two events is NOTIFY_DELAY_MSECS (500ms). This is with 2.3.4.1 from Debian sid. $

On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 at 19:21:16 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > The "subtree" mailbox filter has the same problem, but the > non-parameterized ones ("inboxes", "personal" and "subscribed") work > fine. Actually there are further problem with the INBOX namespace, to which I'm subscribed: $ /usr/lib/dovecot/imap S1: * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY

Hi list, The NOTIFY extension (RFC 5465) works fine for mailboxes in the "virtual/" namespace, but it crashes the IMAP client when used with a mailbox in the empty "" namespace: ~$ /usr/lib/dovecot/imap * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 ? NOTIFY SPECIAL-USE] Logged in as guilhem a NAMESPACE * NAMESPACE (("" "/")("virtual/"

Here is an example with APPEND $ /usr/lib/dovecot/imap S1: * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 ? MOVE NOTIFY SPECIAL-USE] Logged in as guilhem C1: a1 NOTIFY SET (INBOXES (MessageNew MessageExpunge FlagChange)) S1: a1 OK NOTIFY completed (0.000 secs) $ /usr/lib/dovecot/imap S2: * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 ? MOVE NOTIFY SPECIAL-USE] Logged in as guilhem C2: a2 APPEND

Hi, For a few weeks I've been running a custom notification script[1] that uses IMAP NOTIFY. The script uses a single connection, sets up a NOTIFY watch on a couple of mailboxes + automatic FETCH for the selected mailbox. If a status update arrives for a different mailbox, it selects that box and fetches the mail. Today I got the following error in the log: > Aug 5 14:56:12 karif

On 27.04.2016 11:00, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Hi, > >> ? login ? >> C: 2 setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL) >> >> Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<heiko>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=6651, secured >> Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap(heiko):

On 9.5.2019 9.01, Christian Balzer via dovecot wrote: > Hello, > > Both the examples on the Push Notification wiki page and the XAPS plugin > docs seem to suggest or state that LMTP/LDA is required. It is required. > However IMAP IDLE notifications work without either of these (please no > religious discussion of why Dovecot LMTP is the best thing since sliced > bread and

Well, I haven't received anything from the LIST as far as replys yet.. but I went through the source code and added what I needed. If you know which list is better to submit these changes to let me know. I added a option in the smb.conf: Default Authenticaion Domain What it does is if you have that option specified, it will do a comparision to see if the Domain specified by the user is the

UPDATED: Sorry, I didn't specify, my diffs are based off the samba-2.0.6.tar.gz (end of update) ---- Well, I haven't received anything from the LIST as far as replys yet.. but I went through the source code and added what I needed. If you know which list is better to submit these changes to let me know. I added a option in the smb.conf: Default Authenticaion Domain What it does is if

Hello, On Thu, 9 May 2019 09:14:13 +0300 Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > On 9.5.2019 9.01, Christian Balzer via dovecot wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Both the examples on the Push Notification wiki page and the XAPS plugin > > docs seem to suggest or state that LMTP/LDA is required. > > It is required. > Thanks for the quick, but unwelcome reply. There's a

Hallo all, I have the following glm model: f1 <- as.formula(paste("factor(y.fondi)~", "flgsess + segmeta2 + udm + zona.geo + ultimo.prod.", "+flg.a2 + flg.d.na2 + flg.v2 + flg.cc2", " +(flg.a1 + flg.d.na1 + flg.v1 + flg.cc1)^2", " + flg.a2:flg.d.na2 + flg.a2:flg.v2 +

Hello, Both the examples on the Push Notification wiki page and the XAPS plugin docs seem to suggest or state that LMTP/LDA is required. However IMAP IDLE notifications work without either of these (please no religious discussion of why Dovecot LMTP is the best thing since sliced bread and that everybody should use it). The LUA part of the push notification docs however states that events other

Dear all, I want to compute the average of the three blocks for each x-variable which is equal slide in the code below. How can I do that ? block x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 1 23 22 23 24 23 1 21 25 26 21 39 1 23 24 22 23 23 2 20 21 23 24 28 2 32 23 34 24 26 2 19

Dear all I am trying to compare the performances of several methods using the AUC0.1 and not the whole AUC. (meaning I wanted to compare to AUC's whose x axis only goes to 0.1 not 1) I came to know about the Mcneil Hanley test from Bernardo Rangel Tura and I referred to the original paper for the calculation of "r" which is an argument of the function cROC. I can only find the

Dear all, I try to compare the performances of several parameters to diagnose lameness in dogs. I have several ROC curves from the same dataset. I plotted the ROC curves and calculated AUC with the ROCR package. I would like to compare the AUC. I used the following program I found on R-help archives : From: Bernardo Rangel Tura Date: Thu 16 Dec 2004 - 07:30:37 EST

I might be missing something but I thought that AUC was a measure for comparing ROC curves, so there is nothing else needed to "compare" them. The larger AUC is the higher correlation of 2 variables compared. No other measures or calculations are needed. Jarek Tuszynski -----Original Message----- From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On