similar to: handling spam from gmail.

I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Nielsen [mailto:sebastian at sebbe.eu] Sent: donderdag 11 juni 2020 10:23 To: Marc Roos; 'dovecot'; 'users' Subject: SV: handling spam from

Marc Roos wrote: > > > I am sick of this gmail spam. Does anyone know a solution where I can do > something like this: > > 1. received email from adcpni444 at gmail.com > 2. system recognizes this email address has been 'whitelisted', continue > with 7. > 3. system recognizes as this email never been seen before > 4. auto reply with something like (maybe

Wrong mailing list. You need to ask on the list for the MTA you are using (Sendmail, Postfix, &c). Actually, this sounds like a job for a custom milter, which would look at the domain name of the sending system, and reject the mail with your message. Dunno if there is one that works exactly like this. On 6/11/20 1:19 AM, Marc Roos wrote: > > > I am sick of this gmail spam.

This is not a job for dovecot. You should look into whatever is your MTA (exim, postfix etc) and implement the solution there. But my initial suggestion is to check SPF and DKIM of the email. Because I know that gmail does terminate spammers quick, but if you don't validate SPF or DKIM, you might be a victim of spoofed Gmail email. Best regards, Sebastian Nielsen -----Ursprungligt

You do not understand how mail works. Google mail is only getting through when spf checks and the likes are being passed. I am not creating any problems with this, I am just bouncing them back. Google has enough billions to handle these issues. If everyone would apply this procedures, people with legitimate email accounts would move from a spam network to some other provider. People joining

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:19:50AM +0200, Marc Roos wrote: > > > I am sick of this gmail spam. Does anyone know a solution where I can do > something like this: > > 1. received email from adcpni444 at gmail.com > 2. system recognizes this email address has been 'whitelisted', continue > with 7. > 3. system recognizes as this email never been seen before >

I get two or three of these a day. They are not from Gmail but have a "reply to" address that is a Gmail account. The messages cone from an email account that passes SPF and DKIM. So the sender and reply domains differ, but that isn't unique. I have email that I need that arrives like that. I am on the Postfix list where this does belong, but I looked at the problem and decided it

I have clients that process personal data and they even need to have 'special' processing agreements with companies like wetransfer and outlook.com. I had to sign also such agreement and prepare a vm for hot/cold data encryption for processing personal data. If someone leaves a voice mail message, he does not expect that this is going to be send to a third party. I think this

Thanks, am planning to use Google's Speech-to-Text. -----Original Message----- From: Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 3:39 PM To: dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>; Mrinal Sharma <msharma at smithmicro.com> Subject: RE: How to Modify Message and add more Attachments CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL This email originated from outside of Smith

On 10/26/20 10:26 AM, Gregory Heytings wrote: > I too would strongly advise you to use Google Workspace (the recent new > name for G Suite, previously known as Google Apps).? It's cheap, very > reliable, and has all features you can dream of, including an > autoresponder.? It's unrealistic to think that it's possible to beat a > service that costs a mere USD 6 / user

I know about this param, I configured it and log.smbd, log.nmbd and others are rotated, log.samba is not. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "Lorenzo Milesi" <maxxer at yetopen.it>, "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 7:29:04 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] log.samba

08.03.2023 20:09, Fabrizio Rompani via samba ?????: ... > root at landc:~# samba-tool drs showrepl --summary > There are failing connections > Failing outbound connections: > CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=lan > Default-First-Site-Name\NEXTCLOUD via RPC > DSA object GUID: 3fa4ff9a-7fdc-4912-ad73-08b98f6bf347 > Last attempt @ Wed Mar 8

> The latest Samba version is 4.10.6 and there have been numerous updates > since 4.3.11, but you shouldn't be having the problem you have, so lets > start be you posting your smb.conf Thank you very much. Here it is: [global] server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate realm = domain.lan ldap server require strong auth =

Latest Samba4 upgrade (4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.26) broke external LDAP auth probably with the following error: LDAP request size (81) exceeds (0) samba-tool outputs the following when ran: Unknown parameter encountered: "ldap max anonymous request size" Ignoring unknown parameter "ldap max anonymous request size" Unknown parameter encountered: "ldap max authenticated

On 07/02/2023 18:35, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: > > >> A little more context, manual replication unfortunately doesn't help: > > Last (sorry for the spam, I'm starting to forget things): > > # dig _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.wdc.domain.it srv > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.wdc.domain.it. 900 IN SRV 0 100 389 dc1.wdc.domain.it. > >

> Not sure, but that is the way it looks, just a thought, are you using > sssd ? no, not even installed > Just like a normal share, '[homes]' is a special share that doesn't use > 'path. There used to be something on the wiki about using '[home]' on a > DC, I didn't know it had gone until you mentioned it ;-) So if I use [home] it would be a normal

Can you try this and adjust the path's in it. #/etc/logrotate.d/samba /var/log/samba/log.smbd { weekly missingok rotate 7 postrotate [ ! -x /usr/bin/smbcontrol ] || [ ! -f /run/samba/smbd.pid ] || /usr/bin/smbcontrol smbd reload-config endscript compress delaycompress notifempty } /var/log/samba/log.nmbd {

> >Thats because in your example the data is sent outside the facility to a third party (in this case, wetransfer/outlook) And wetransfer/outlook is operated in third countries, which can cause GDPR problems as the legal protection for the data disappears. > That is just a part. We had to sign such agreement between companies in the same country, city even. Data is not even leaving

> which share isn't working ? > is it 'CONDIVISIONE' ? What is really weird is: Computer01, Win10, user1 logged in as local (not using domain user), share mapped with domain user. In the path I've posted in the first message the user can access BUT cannot write. Computer01, Win10, user1 logged in as domain user: same as above, user can access the folder but cannot write.

> samba-tool domain: no such subcommand: provision Are you sure there's no typo or hidden character? provision command is still there in 4.18.2 :) # samba-tool domain provision ERROR: No domain set! -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.com CTO @ YetOpen Srl Corso Martiri della Liberazione 114 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY - | 4801 Glenwood Avenue - Suite 200 - Raleigh, NC 27612 - USA