similar to: doveadm backup : Error: Failed to access mailbox

Hi Bruce, thank you for your answer. What I want to know is following: Imagine that I create threads in some way. I want threads to execute the same BC, while using the same memory space. I know that LLVM IR has a nice structure: Context - Module - Execution engine. Is there a way to run several instances of LLVM (using threads for example) with the same memory space? On Fri, May 30, 2014 at

Hello, I'm interested in development of multi threaded applications using LLVM. I would like to ask, is there a possibility in LLVM to create several threads, executing software concurrently, while sharing the same memory space? If yes, on which level this can be done (e.g. context, execution engine,...)? Best regards, Jasmin JAHIC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Hi everybody! I'm using LVM and ext3 and am very satisfied with it. But now I have the following problem: I have a filesystem on a LV which is in use - files are created, modified and so on. To do a backup I'd like to create a snapshot of this volume which gets backup'd and then dropped. # lvcreate -s -L 20M -n snapshot /dev/vg/data lvcreate -- WARNING: the snapshot will be

I have dovecot version 2.1.7 and I have quota configured as: ----------------------------------- dict { quota_domain = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext } mail_plugins = quota protocol imap { mail_plugins = quota quota imap_quota } plugin { quota = dict:domain:%d:proxy::quota_domain quota_rule = *:storage=1M quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M }

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:08:45 +0200 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > Not sure if it matters but here is the AD object of a user with no > issues: > > [root at GJSERVER ~]# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b > 'ou=office,dc=samdom,dc=example,dc=ch' -s sub > "(&(objectclass=person)(samaccountname=jd))" > # record 1 > dn:

Hi, First, thanks for this awesome piece of software. I've just upgraded to latest dovecot, aka 1.2. I've a problem. I've started using Sieve, and everything works fine, I already received a thousand of mails without any problem. However, there's one mail which is stuck in the postfix queue because of that: Jul 8 18:47:51 prometheus dovecot: deliver(jd at danjou.info):

Hi, I want to generate 10000 samples from normal distribution with replacement case and every sample size is 50. What should I do ? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/IMPORTANT-PLEASE-HELP-ME-tp4650676.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I am wondering why my function works fine in R1.7.1 and R1.8.1 but not in R1.9.0. I thought it's an environment related problem but I can't solve it. >data weta jd 1 1 4 2 2 13 3 2 13 4 6 4 5 1 3 6 1 7 7 2 10 8 3 10 9 1 8 10 1 8 11 3 6 12 1 9 13 1 5 14 1 1 15 3 13 16 1 2 17 2 2 18 7 11 19 1 3 20 5 4

On 30 May 2014 11:01, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > I think your question is a result of misunderstanding the nature of LLVM. It is not a virtual machine, it is an abstract machine and a set of tools implementing compilers for that abstract machine. You don't run the bitcode (well, you can interpret it, but you don't usually), you compile the bitcode

I was just checking out the dids for all of my fail over providers and noticed that neither DID that I have with SixTel work. Both pause for a long long time The local number gives a recording: 'The number you have dialed is not in service or is assigned in a different area code. Please check your number and dial again'. The 800 number just rings busy. Anyone else having this issue or

I've been going nuts lately trying to get rid of an annoying echo problem that makes my asterisk server unusable when clients try to call me. Here's the breakdown of the issue - Hoping that someone can throw me a clue: My setup is as such: Single AMD Athon machine with X100P clone card and voip through multiple providers . * Inbound calls through the X100P that do not bridge to

Hi Ilia, thanks for your reply. > DP-MST support was first added to nouveau for precisely these kinds of > setups. It does, generally, work, so that means there's something > extra-special about your setup. Yes... this is what it looks like. Even the proprietary driver, which works after bootup, has its problems with the setup after multiple consecutive VT switches (e.g. after

Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Very nice Torok! I applied most of the patch. A few comments: > Thanks! > 1) What is your jni.h file? I can't compile the Jni.cpp file with your > changes. > Ouch, did they change 'const'-ness between gcj versions? I was using gcj-4.2.3, and jni.h is from libgcj8-dev. > 2) ISO C++ does not support %jd. x86_64 does not know about

I am running jungledisk and this is my script: #!/bin/sh ### Backs up office data to Jungledisk using rsync LOGFILE=/var/log/backup-jd.log ## Start in rc.local or here #/usr/local/bin/jungledisk mount /mnt/s3 echo "`date +"%F %R"`: Start backup-jd" >> $LOGFILE rsync -r --inplace --size-only --bwlimit=50 /home/shares/allusers/127 /mnt/s3 echo "`date +"%F

Hi, When I try this on IRB it works fine as follows: >>/\A[\w+\-.!#$\%&''*\/\=?^`{|}~]+@[a-z\d\-.]+\.[a-z]+\z/.match("jd!#$\%&''*+-/=?^_`{|}~oe-PV5Ro7/Mrj4@public.gmane.org") => #<MatchData "jd!%&''*+-/=?^_`{|}~oe-PV5Ro7/Mrj4@public.gmane.org"> When I try it through my Ruby on Rails program I get a nil. Any idea what is

On Mar 26, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Török Edwin wrote: [...] >> 2) ISO C++ does not support %jd. x86_64 does not know about %lld? >> > > It does, but gcc gives a warning, if I use %lld I get a warning on > x86_64, if I %ld I get a warning on x86-32. > int64_t is long int on x86-64. However sizeof(long int) == sizeof(long > long int), so I don't know why gcc insists it is

> >Message: 1 >Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:04:39 -0700 (PDT) >From: jd >Subject: [CentOS-virt] ConVirt 1.0 released. >To: centos-virt at centos.org >Message-ID: >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > >hi > Just wanted to bring to your attention the release of ConVirt 1.0. >

Hi Lang, On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 19:12, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I updated my project to LLVM 10.0 today and I am getting JIT symbol resolution errors. >> I could not find any example or updated tutorial or documentation that describes the new api - as all documentation seems out of date. > > > The doxygen comments should be up-to-date, as should

I'm still relatively a novice with asterisk and am having issues with echo. The calling party that calls a PSTN number doesnt hear the echo, but the answered side via sip or forwarded to another PSTN number over voip hears excessive echo that makes it difficult to communicate. I've been playing with the zapata.conf settings for echocancel, echotraining, rxgain, txgain, etc and am

Le 07/07/2023 à 12:49, Joshua C. Colp a écrit : > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:40 PM Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf > <mailto:jd.girard at sysnux.pf>> wrote: > > There seems to be a problem with the tar.gz archive on github. It's > correct on downloads.asterisk.org <http://downloads.asterisk.org>. > > > Can you be more specific?