similar to: Sieve regexp matches wrong

Hi, I have tried both RC4 and from the repository but I can't seem to get samba4 to compile. I have rebuilt the OS (Centos 6.3) from scratch and I am still having the same issue. I get: WAF_MAKE=1 ./buildtools/bin/waf build Waf: Entering directory `/opt/samba-master/bin' Selected embedded Heimdal build [ 133/3978] Generating VERSION [ 168/3978] Generating smbd/build_options.c [1815/3978]

Hi all! I'm trying to build the buoh comic reader for centos 6 and my head is getting tired of repeated forceful contact with the wall. I built it on 5.6 without undue problems, but somehow 6.0 is beating me. (and no, the 5.6 binary doesn't work, at least not without a lot of futzing around, on 6.0. tried that first.) before I give gory details, has anyone already done this, from whom

I found a case which gcc can compile while llvm-gcc can not. I'm using the gcc4.1 and the most recent llvm-gcc. Here is the case: template <int N> class T { public: int V; }; T<4> test(T<4> a[4][8]) { return a[3][3]; } llvm-gcc dumped: fail.cpp: In function \u2018T<4> test(T<4> (*)[8])\u2019: fail.cpp:7: error: invalid use of incomplete type

Whoops, forgot to CC: the list. > >----- Forwarded Message ---- >From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> >To: Sheng Zhou <zhousheng00 at gmail.com> >Sent: Tue, November 9, 2010 9:26:51 PM >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc not compatible with gcc on a small case? > > >Hi Sheng Zhou, > > >It shouldn't compile. You have the method declared

Hello, To get the binary vmxloader on FC5 i need to compile this from xen source with "make KERNELS=linux-2.6-xen world". There is a error "cc1: warnings being treated as errors" and compile aborts. --- make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/xen-3.0.1/xen'' tools/figlet/figlet -d tools/figlet Xen 3.0.1 > include/xen/banner.h.new __ __ _____ ___ _ \ \/

hello this is the error chan_vpb.cc: In function \u2018void mkbrd(vpb_model_t, int)\u2019: chan_vpb.cc:1530: aviso: la dereferencia de punteros de tipo castigado romper las reglas de alias estricto chan_vpb.cc: In function \u2018ast_channel* vpb_new(vpb_pvt*, ast_channel_state, char*)\u2019: chan_vpb.cc:2671: aviso: comparacin entre expresiones enteras signed y unsigned g++ -c -o chan_vpb.o

Here is the example code: class A { const int x[5]; public: //A() { x[0] = 1; x[1] = 1; x[2] = 2; x[3] = 3; x[4] = 4; } A():x((const int[5]){1,2,3,4,5}) {} int getV(int idx) { return x[idx];} }; //const int A::x[5] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int main() { A a; return a.getV(1); } gcc 4.1.2 can compile the above code. llvm-gcc reports: x.cpp: In constructor \u2018A::A()\u2019: x.cpp:5:

for example: template <int N> class T { public: int V; }; T<4> test(T<4> a[4][8]) { return a[3][3]; } in LLVM23 release, it will crash llvm-gcc, test.cpp: In function \u2018T<4> test(T<4> (*)[8])\u2019: test.cpp:7: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See

Hi All, ls() doesn't show cu.summary. ?ls says "When invoked with no argument at the top level prompt, \u2018ls\u2019 shows what data sets and functions a user has defined." Therefore, the reason ls() doesn't show cu.summary is because cu.summary is from a package but not user defined. Is there a way to show not only user defined data sets but also data sets from loaded

Something that looks like a bug to me - but as there may be a documented reason I have missed, I wanted to ask about it here first. Please let me know if this looks like something I should submit as a bug, if not, why this behavior is intended. Using RGui v2.15.3, 64bit, on a Windows 7 machine with US English locale You can see the behavior I describe in the following -------------------- >

It is not first application which i'm trying to run with wine, but first one failed to do so. If somebody can suggest what to do then please! Download available here: http://download.videohelp.com/DVDSubEdit/ Also, you need mfc42.dll and register it (or winetricks vcrun6). The problems after: Code: Beast:/# wine /home/user/.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files/DVDSubEdit/DVDSubEdit.exe wine:

I am trying to use SoftHangup in my dialplan, but it's either not working or I'm not using it correctly. when i'm on the console, i see: pbx1*CLI> core show channels Channel Location State Application(Data) SIP/vgw1-000000a2 2156181505 at inbound:1 Up AppDial((Outgoing Line)) SIP/143-0000009f s at macro-SaferSIPDial Up Dial(SIP/99302156181505 at vgw1,, 2 active

Upgraded from 16.2.14 to 1.6.2.15 on Fedora 13, with aastra 9133i and 57i. On 9133i and 57i: #<extension># works for a blind transfer. Xfer<extension>Xfer doesn't! All this worked on 1.6.2.14. Nothing useful on cli, verbose 3, DEBUG. Here extension 169 answers an outside call, and tries to transfer it to 145 using the Xfer button: -- SIP/169-0000009c answered

Just a quick question or maybe a suggestion, is there a gem/plugin that will convert ruby regexp to javascript regexp? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

I am trying to use the fnmatch() function in a C program and pass as the 3rd arg (options) of case insensitive search... When I use the value FNM_CASEFOLD it does not work... I'm confused on what to send to fnmatch() to do a case insensitive search. Any pointers ? Thanks. Jerry

I notice in recent commits that a number of these have been added: /\[(\d+)\]/.freeze I thought that Regexps are immutable. Furthermore, Regexp literals don''t generate a new object each time they are encountered: irb(main):001:0> 3.times { puts /\d+/.object_id } -605707646 -605707646 -605707646 => 3 irb(main):002:0> Unlike strings: irb(main):002:0> 3.times { puts

Hi, I''m looking through the Merb::Routing code and I''ve found a regexp that I can''t figure out how it works. Merb::Router::SECTION_REGEXP #=> /(?::([a-z*_]+))/ It takes a route definition string, like "/products/:model/:id" and extracts the "model" string on the first pass, and later the "id" string. Can anyone shed some light on

What are your opinions on pcre vs regexp for header_, body_, and mime_checks in Postfix? I looked at the regexp_table and prce_table man pages, and see almost no difference other than the available flags. Miark

How would I use a regular expression to eclude an email address? I''m using validates_format_of :username, :with => :message => "Your username cannot be an email address." What is the expression to use after "with: =>" to exclude an "@"? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

There was an old email thread from the end of January 2006 discussing regular expressions for matching URLs. I took some of the sample expressions and tweaked them a bit to the point where I think they are pretty useful. They pass all of my tests anyway. :-) For a reminder, here''s a sample message from that thread. My code is below it. On Jan 26, 2006, at 5:28 AM, Nathaniel S.