similar to: Compress by zlib only selected Maildir folders

? I'm interested in ruby and I try the ruby193 SCL and I want to run Ruby on Rails with Apache, so I'm searching mod_passenger for this ruby SCL version, but I found, that this package is not in this SCL. Are any other possibilities to run Ruby on Rails with Apache or why is mod_passenger not in this SCL? ? Thanks, Filip Bartmann

On 09/12/2019 17:25, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: >> On 09/12/2019 17:20 Reio Remma via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> >> Hello! >> >> Are there any plans for an official Dovecot repo for CentOS 8? >> >> Thanks, >> Reio > (sorry for duplicate, user error in earlier one...) > > Yes. There are plans for the repo,

I found, that RedHat released RedHat Software Collections for RedHat EL 6, will this be sometimes available for CentOS too?

I have dovecot version 2.1.7 and I have quota configured as: ----------------------------------- dict { quota_domain = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext } mail_plugins = quota protocol imap { mail_plugins = quota quota imap_quota } plugin { quota = dict:domain:%d:proxy::quota_domain quota_rule = *:storage=1M quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M }

Hi Filip, On 12 Dec 2019, at 12:01, filbar at centrum.cz wrote: > Hello, > I have builded some dovecot packages for CentOS 8 in my personal > repository: > http://repo.joomhosting.eu/centos/8/x86_64/ > and SRPMS are in > http://repo.joomhosting.eu/centos/8/SRPMS/ > > I you want you can try it. > > With best regards, > Filip Bartmann would it be useful/advisable

Hello, I have large of archive mails which I access occasionally. Is it possible to have in dovecot in user account archive folder which is compressed to save disk space? Thank's Filip Bartmann

Hello David, ----- Nachricht von David Pottage via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> --------- Datum: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:56:51 +0000 Von: David Pottage via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> Antwort an: David Pottage <david at chrestomanci.org> Betreff: Re: Virus scan + removal on a mdbox mail storage An: dovecot at dovecot.org > On 2019-02-20

Hi, I have just discovered that the IMAP account setup wizard in outlook 2019 assumes that the email address for a user is the same as their username, and there is no easy way to separately enter different user. (It can be done via hidden dialog boxes, command line switches and registry hacking, but it is far from easy [1]) Like many small setups, the dovecot accounts on my mail server map

Hi, I need advice on how virus scan and removal can be done on a _mdbox_ mail storage? On a maildir storage the virus scanner (e.g. clamav etc.) can detect and remove a email that is infected, since every email and attachment are stored in separate files. But in mdbox the emails and attachments are compressed together in one ore more mdbox-files ... I am anxious to convert my mail

Hi to everyone! I have succerfully instaled my new Asterisk 1.4 on my debian etch. I have my users in sip.conf like this: [200] type=peer host=dynamic context=home secret=200 callerid= 200 dtmfmode=rfc2833 nat=yes mailbox=200 at home disallow=all allow=ulaw I can make calls in my LAN but i can?t ear comunications with another client trought Internet. My Asterisk is in my LAN and i not have a

Hello David, ----- Nachricht von David Pottage via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> --------- Datum: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:58:14 +0000 Von: David Pottage via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> Antwort an: David Pottage <david at chrestomanci.org> Betreff: Re: Virus scan + removal on a mdbox mail storage An: dovecot at dovecot.org [...] >> NO! My

Hello I am currently running dovecot 1.2.15 on my home server. I have over 200 folders in personal email account, and I have found that my smart-phone does not work well trying to display that many folders. I solved the problem by creating a second instance of dovecot running on a non standard port, and configured it to serve only a subset my email folders, so that way the email client on my

Hi everyone, We are using the IAXy boxes and Asterisk over the internet and I was wondering if Asterisk can do a codec translation during a call in order to lower the bandwidth that the comunications consumes? I mean, the IAXy boxes only support the ADPCM and uLAW codecs, but for a certain number of calls our bandwidth runs out, then I think if Asterisk can convert the signal that comes in ADPCM

We are pleased to release v2.3.10.1 Please find it from locations below: https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.10.1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.10.1.tar.gz.sig Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ Docker images in https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot Aki Tuomi Open-Xchange oy --- - CVE-2020-10957: lmtp/submission: A client can crash the server by

We are pleased to release v2.3.10.1 Please find it from locations below: https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.10.1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.10.1.tar.gz.sig Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ Docker images in https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot Aki Tuomi Open-Xchange oy --- - CVE-2020-10957: lmtp/submission: A client can crash the server by

? I've found that in https://softwarecollections.org/repos/rhscl/ruby193/epel-6-x86_64/ is passenger included but in http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/ruby193/ is not. What is the differences between this two repos? ? Thanks, Filip Bartmann

Hi Rui, What's the intended advantage for compressing the debug sections? - (i) Improved link time through smaller IO / (ii) Improved Load / startup time for the debugger / (iii) Smaller exe with debug info for distribution / disk space? For i) and ii) how much this is worth it depends on balance of storage bandwidth to compression (i) / decompression (ii) bandwidth. For spinning drives it

Hi, Has anyone made a successfull instalation of cdr_odbc?? I've install unixODBC-2.2.8 (made my own RPM) and then built the module. I'm trying to send the cdrs to a M$ SQL server. The sql connection works because I can do any query via isql. When I do the calls I get the following output on the asterisk console: -- Executing Hangup("SIP/test1-a5e1", "") in new

Also not an expert, but would it make sense for this to be configurable at a fine-grained level, perhaps with another option, or an extension to the compress-debug-sections switch interface? That way users who care about the finer details can configure it themselves. And we should pick sensible options for the default. James On 2 August 2018 at 11:08, Pavel Labath via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at

> As to (3), in most cases, I believe it is rare to distribute executables with debug info widely > I think it is at least less important than (1). Agreed. > I think (1) is definitely the case, and that's also true for a distributed build system with which a lot of object files are copied between machines. > My suggestion was to use compression level 9 when both -O2 and