similar to: converting old uucp buffer files to maildir

Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources are behaving fine. Instead I'm just seing Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01 postfix/smtpd[107746]: Anonymous TLS connection established from talvi.dovecot.org[94.237.25.159]: TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits) Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01

On 27/02/2023 4:13 am, Chris Candreva wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2023, Ken Bass wrote: > >> doc.dovecot.org does not have a DNS entry. It worked a few days ago, but not now. > [chris at newpop ~]$ host doc.dovecot.org > doc.dovecot.org is an alias for talvi.dovecot.org. > talvi.dovecot.org has address 94.237.105.223 > talvi.dovecot.org has IPv6 address

Fixed, we had smtp_security_level=verify, which I forgot to remove when we removed the relay server we used. Now it should work. Aki On 28.3.2019 13.59, Christian Anthon via dovecot wrote: > Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving > mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources > are behaving fine. > > Instead I'm just

Fyi, after this patch I started seeing the error below: Jul 3 09:46:55 mail11a dovecot: IMAP(user at example.com): file mail-cache-lookup.c: line 270 (mail_cache_field_exists): assertion failed: (field < view->cache->fields_count) Bill On Mon, July 3, 2006 7:12 am, tss-movial at dovecot.org said: > Update of /var/lib/cvs/dovecot/src/lib-storage/index > In directory

doc.dovecot.org does not have a DNS entry. It worked a few days ago, but not now. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20230226/f27e9050/attachment.htm>

Am 09.02.19 um 19:56 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > I'll review the settings when we manage to upgrade to mailman3 Hello Aki, before updating to mailman3 consider an simpler update to latest mailman2. you're using 2.1.15, current mailman2 is 2.1.29 Your missing an /significant amount/ of DMARC fixes! and: more off-topic: while my messages *to* the dovecot list are sent using

I've actually been thinking about it almost since the beginning. It's just been annoying waste of space on my screen. And more importantly nowadays it's also breaking DKIM/DMARC signatures. So if somebody still uses Subject-based filtering it's about time to switch to List-ID header based filtering now. Another thing I'm wondering about is if I should allow text/html parts,

If I don't get swamp of errors with this email, I'll stop the From munging starting tomorrow. There is now ARC signing done for mails. Lets see how this works, if we can stop rewriting from I'll be happy. Aki

Hi all! On 11/12/2019 19:16, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: > Atomia via dovecot skrev den 2019-12-11 17:37: [...] > wonderfull example on why mailman sooks on change sender from :// Reply-to munging is considered harmful - please fix that. And thunderbird shows in the "From", "Recipient", "Correspondents" and "Sender[@]" column only "dovecot

On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 12:00, mailman at dovecot.org wrote: > ...: host ...[...] said: 504 > <talvi>: Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname (in reply to > RCPT TO command) Whops. 12 people's subscriptions got disabled because of that. It's fixed now and I've restored the subscriptions. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment

Will this perhaps fix these? imap-login: Jun 15 12:28:16 Panic: file ioloop.c: line 90: assertion failed: (i o->fd <= current_ioloop->highest_fd) dovecot: Jun 15 12:28:16 Error: child 17987 (login) killed with signal 6 imap-login: Jun 15 13:14:58 Panic: file ioloop.c: line 90: assertion failed: (i o->fd <= current_ioloop->highest_fd) dovecot: Jun 15 13:14:58 Error: child 13002

Woops... yep, that was the problem. Sorry. Bill On Mon, July 3, 2006 10:08 am, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> said: > Are you sure you're not just mixing changes to CVS HEAD and branch_1_0? > CVS HEAD was broken for days before this patch fixed it. > > On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 09:59 -0400, Bill Boebel wrote: >Fyi, after this patch I started seeing the error below: >

# 2.2.15 (3db5fbb216d3): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.6 [...] The latest HG commits produce the following sieve execution error. There is no error log created though... Nov 13 08:54:11 nihlus dovecot: lmtp(tlx at leuxner.net): kFEQG6JjZFQZBAAAgUOSbA: sieve: msgid=<hg.e3b52d11d038.1415865308.6920021320469856403 at talvi>: stored mail into mailbox 'INBOX' Nov 13

Hi, sorry for top post but short answer is ,there is no exchange without outlook, that is what makes exchange a good "groupware solution", on windows only. So compare it to dovecot makes only small sense..... Am 12.05.20 um 13:24 schrieb Michael Hirmke: > Hi Marc, > > >> How did you decide for the Baikal? I have been testing a long time ago > > it was easy to

How did you decide for the Baikal? I have been testing a long time ago with this apple ccs calendarserver, but it did/does not feel right. I think there were tasks also in this one, but I am not sure anymore. I had argument with the developers that they should not enforce openssl building, they did not get that they are developers and not sysadmins and should just do development. Their

On 5/12/20 8:45 AM, Michael Hirmke wrote: > Hi Robert, > >> Hi, sorry for top post >> but short answer is ,there is no exchange without outlook, that is what >> makes exchange a good "groupware solution", on windows only. >> So compare it to dovecot makes only small sense..... Have you looked at SOGo for a groupware option? https://sogo.nu/ -- Bob

Hi Marc, >How did you decide for the Baikal? I have been testing a long time ago it was easy to install/configure and it was sufficient for my needs. >with this apple ccs calendarserver, but it did/does not feel right. I I have no idea about anything regarding the Apple universe. >think there were tasks also in this one, but I am not sure anymore. I They are called

Hi, Dovecot version 2.2.36 In log files I get this error: dovecot: imap(test): Namespace '': mkdir(/home/mail/domain/test/Maildir) failed: Permission denied (euid=1005(vmail) egid=1005(vmail) missing +w perm: /home/mail/domain, UNIX perms appear ok (ACL/MAC wrong?)) My authentication configuration is this: passdb { driver = passwd-file args = username_format=%n /etc/dovecot/users }

On 12-05-2020 15:45, Michael Hirmke wrote: > Hi Robert, > >> Hi, sorry for top post >> but short answer is ,there is no exchange without outlook, that is what >> makes exchange a good "groupware solution", on windows only. >> So compare it to dovecot makes only small sense..... > > you can use Exchange with pure IMAP clients, too, but then you lose

I have recently been working/testing with exchange 2016 and started thinking if I should even migrate to this platform. I assume more people here have experience with exchange and this idea. I was wondering if this is possible with a dovecot setup 1. public folder can be implemented with a public mailbox? 2. authorize users via groups access to mailboxes/folders of the public