similar to: Public folder replication ( not replicating) - roadmap query

Hi, Further to my earlier posting to the mailing list this morning regarding replicating of public namespaces is it possible that a shared name space can be replicated: https://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Shared We use LDAP, the thought being that an LDAP service account is created and the corresponding mailbox is shared to other mail users on the server. Kind regards Daniel

On 21 Mar 2015, at 10:14, Florian Sager <sager at agitos.de> wrote: > > Hi Timo, > > congrats to the merger with OX. > > Currently the implementation of RFC 5257, ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1, has > only low priority on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap > I want to explain a scenario that would benefit from annotation support > to - maybe - increase the priority in your

We started using Dovecot replication between two nodes and noticed that our configured private flags (INDEXPVT) in public/shared mailboxes are not replicated. We are only replicating INBOX namespace, as we dont want to replicate content of shared mailboxes for every user again. Is there a way to replicate the INDEXPVT or is that not (yet) implemented? Dovecot versions: # 2.2.31 (65cde28):

Hi Timo, congrats to the merger with OX. Currently the implementation of RFC 5257, ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1, has only low priority on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap I want to explain a scenario that would benefit from annotation support to - maybe - increase the priority in your roadmap: I'm currently working on a project to publish bank customer related documents inside a banking

I can't find any R roadmap. Is it available somewhere ? Etienne -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Roadmap---tp21791647p21791647.html Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 22:14 +0200, Davy Defaud via samba wrote: > > So, what’s the current status now? I can see RODC and SUBDOMAIN on the > roadmap. > But, as there are not “FUNDED”, is there someone actually working on it? > If so, are they targeted for a particular version or just “when it’s ready”? RODC support has been funded as is pretty good as of 4.8. There are still some

Hi all... I'm looking once again at the Syslinux roadmap. It seems to me that we're going to have a very hard time making Syslinux 4.00 be the full-featured everything-in-C release I had hoped for, or perhaps more specifically, that it is justifiable to sit on the current filesystems-in-C code waiting for the rest. That would probably mean productizing the transitional COM32R module

Hello, Just wanted to go take a peek at the latest Roadmap for dovecot, and note that the current wiki page is flagged as obsolete: https://wiki.dovecot.org/Roadmap Is there an updated version somewhere? I'm interested in the list of new features being worked on - especially JMAP support - and a rough idea of when said features might be expected to make it into a release. Thanks!

FYI... I've posted an updated roadmap for the 3.0 release schedule at http://www.samba.org/samba/roadmap-3.html Looks like a lot of documentation needs to be done :-) Enjoy..... cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team

Hi all, Has anyone actually got sysvol replication working between 2 (or more) Samba4 DCs? I've tried gluster, inosync, csync and rsync and keep getting stuck on issues with the extended attributes. Is there a roadmap or any clues of a date when MSFRS or DFS replication will be part of Samb4? thanks again, Jim

Hi there, I'm very interested in oVirt as a management interface for a VM setup we're building, however it seems as though there isn't much info on the product roadmap or active development. I'm wondering if anyone could point me to more information on the roadmap or commit activity on the project? Regards, Anthony -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi Chris, Chris Lattner <sabre <at> nondot.org> writes: > We generally have not published a road map like this because it is very > difficult to do it in a meaningful way. Because LLVM is largely driven by > volenteers and because noone working on it guarantees that they will > finish a project that they start, we can't make 'promises' about new >

Hi Valery, On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:15 +0200, Valery Khamenya wrote: > Hi, > > where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this > and perhaps next year? About the best "roadmap" we have is the list of enhancements in Bugzilla:

Dear NUT developers and contributors, time has come to shed more light on 2.8.0 roadmap! Ubuntu Developer Summit attendance has helped to clarify things. several of 2.8.0 tasks are detailed here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerOneiricInfraPower I'm conscious that our development infrastructure (Alioth) is not that suitable to track roadmaps, "Agile" specs and developments, as we do

On May 9, 2012, at 8:34 AM, dag at cray.com wrote: > Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> writes: > >>> When I asked about enhancing scheduler heuristics a month or so ago, I >>> got a response about a MachineInstr scheduler and that that was the way >>> of the LLVM future. Is that so? Is the ScheduleDAG going away? >> >> You sent a lengthy RFC

As promised, in preparation for next week's SIG meeting, here's a kick-off discussion about the Virtualization SIG roadmap. I'm mainly tossing out ideas here -- see this is an invitation to discussion. Key things I think should be on the roadmap: * Release process - General cadence - Estimate of the next release (if any) * Specification of targets - Right now, mainly xen4centos

http://dovecot.org/roadmap.html I'll try to keep it updated. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071230/4cfeacec/attachment-0002.bin>

Hi; I need the xen development roadmap. Where can I find it? Best Regards, Ergin Ozekes -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20140121/95c040eb/attachment.html>

Hey Timo, I was curious where Single Instance Storage fits in on the roadmap, now that you are maybe settled in in your new digs... Is it still coming soon? Has it been pushed back by your new employers priorities? Its real high on mine, so if has been back-burnered, I'll need to start looking for alternatives... Thanks, -- Best regards, Charles

Hi, I was looking for the roadmap for Centos 4.x. Is the release schedule somewhere on centos.org end if not, when can we expect the release of Centos 4.3? Somebody on irc in #centos told me it's a matter of weeks but it would be nice to get a more official confirmatiion so I can plan the rollout of Centos in my serverpark. regards, Geert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML