similar to: Seive + Spamprobe terminates with signal 6

FWIW this took me days to get right, and still needs tinkering, but it might make for a good starting point for anyone else needing something similar (ie; I don't use or need the overhead of spamassassin or rspamd). https://gist.github.com/markc/eeeb66ce30ea805af62631656cf86c4d Any comments or corrections on that page would be appreciated.

Perhaps I have not looked hard enough but is it possible to get at the current users auth userdb "home" (or $HOME) variable from inside a sieve script? Example?

On Tue Jul 07 2020 02:07:08 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Mark Constable <markc at renta.net> wrote: > FWIW I meant if the client is Windows7/old-Outlook then changing either > 993/SSL or 143/STARTTLS to 143/NONE could help pick up the mail. We had > to do this for a 100 or so clients a few months ago after upgrading to > Ubuntu 20.04. Really, really bad idea. You just

On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 01:45:06AM +0300, Sami Ketola wrote: > > > > On 7. Jul 2020, at 0.48, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > > > > Got a client that usually uses Outlook I think 2010. This person tends to move > > their e-mails to certain folers. On Thunderbird, the move shows. > > Not on Outlook. > > > > Any

Would anyone have an example of how to use dovecot-pigeonhole to call spamprobe as an external program in the current 2.2.25?

Hello Dovecot gurus, I've set up SPF checking on my postfix gateway and have confirmed that messages from domains set with hard fails that don't come from a good sender are rejected outright. Messages from domains set with a softfail that come from bad sources are tagged in the message header with "Softfail (domain owner discourages use of this host)", but end up in the

Hello! I have the following three types of mailboxes on my server: 1) Regular user mail /var/mail/<user> in mbox format 2) Suspected spam in /var/tmp/spamprobe in mbox format 3) Archived mailing list in /home/mks/mksarch in mbox format I want the 1) to be only accessible to the respective <user>, obviously (POP3 and/or IMAP4). I wanted the 2) to be accessible to all users --

On 16/7/20 5:54 am, Benny Pedersen wrote: >>> FWIW I meant if the client is Windows7/old-Outlook then changing >>> either 993/SSL or 143/STARTTLS to 143/NONE could help pick up the >>> mail. > > windows 7 just need tls 1.0, why its need to disabled all, is as well > beyong me, do not disable tls 1.0 in dovecot aslong one have windows > 7 clients Would anyone

Hello, I'm trying to set up a public folder called TestFolder. I'm getting this error: #doveadm acl get -A "Public/TestFolder" doveadm(username at example.com): Error: Can't open mailbox Public/TestFolder: Mailbox doesn't exist: Public/TestFolder Username ID Global Rights # ls -ld /var/vmail/public drwx------ 4 vmail vmail 512 Apr 15 23:17 public/ # ls -ld

I have installed dovecot and sieve using the FreeBSD ports. Authentication is against a MySql Database. Dovecot is running using deliver as the LDA. But when I try to Sieve I get the following error in /var/log/dovecot.log deliver(mike at systemrt.com): Apr 19 14:07:19 Info: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/libexec/dovecot deliver(mike at systemrt.com): Apr 19 14:07:19 Fatal: Plugin

Timo, I have a wild idea for a feature that is somewhat unusual, would be very powerful, and easy to implement. What I want is ... Special folders that when someone drags a message into them - it pipes the message into a program. The reason I want this is - for example - reporting of spam. Suppose you want everyone to have a spam-missed folder so that if a spam gets through then the user

I came across this thread from a couple years ago: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-November/119346.html Has there been any progress on RDF for X86? Or is there some other preferred alternative for performing reachability analysis after register allocation? Thanks, Scott Constable -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Do you know whether it has been fixed on the 8.0.1 release? Scott On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 9:45 AM Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com>> wrote: The one blocking issue that existed in the past has been fixed. I haven’t had time to do any work on it lately, but I’m not aware of any fundamental problems that would make it not work on x86. --

Hi Scott, Sorry for the late reply, I was out of office during the holidays. 1. A def node can reach either a use node, or another def node. In the highlighted phi node (p3224), the def (d3225) reaches another def (1598) in statement (s1597), that’s why it’s needed. 2. The reason why the def of R11 in s1578 is not connected directly to the use in s1725 is that there may be an intervening

Hi Scott, That #1073741833 is a register mask. They are treated as aggregate registers (essentially sets of registers), so if it includes R9D and R11D, it will be treated as being aliased with both. These separate defs are there because they reach disjoint registers. -- Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com> AI tools development From: Scott

I currently use Ubuntu 20.04 with Dovecot 2.3.7.2 and OpenSSL 1.1.1f. A few months ago there was an update to all these systems and since then I've had to talk W7 and old Mac clients through disabling ports 993/995 with TLS enabled back to ports 143/110 without SSL or they could not pick up email. Thunderbird users (ie; me) were unaffected. Could anyone share a set of port 993/995 SSL

On 06 Jul 2020, at 20:30, Mark Constable <markc at renta.net> wrote: > you could try disabling SSL/STARTTLS on port 143. What? I?ve never seen SSL/StARTTLS on port 143,a dn I doubt that would work? -- Rumour is information distilled so finely that it can filter through anything. It does not need doors and windows -- sometimes it does not need people. It can exist free and wild, running

I want to supply separate Letsencrypt certificates for each virtual domain and seeing that SNI does not work I need to allocate separate IPs. Could anyone give some pointers, or keywords to search for, on... a) how to make dovecot listen for different domains on different IPs? b) how to configure separate SSL certs for each of these IPs?

On 7/7/20 12:16 pm, The Doctor wrote: >>> Got a client that usually uses Outlook I think 2010. This >>> person tends to move their e-mails to certain folers. On >>> Thunderbird, the move shows. Not on Outlook. Any explanation? > > Using IMAp, most folders should sync client and server. Just > wondering if an old version of Outlook has passed its time. FWIW

Using plotrix, is it possible to create a legend for the following and attach it to the radial.plot?   posmat<-matrix(sample(2:9,30,TRUE),nrow=3) radial.plot(posmat,labels=paste("X",1:10,sep=""),rp.type="p",   main="Spiderweb plot",line.col=2:4,show.grid=FALSE,lwd=1:3,   radial.lim=c(0,10))   Thanks. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]