similar to: sieve question

Hi Ralph! Thanks for your reply! On 4/20/20 12:19 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > I suggest you don't use Sieve for this, but simply configure Postfix > to reject messages to @old.domain.com with the desired message. MTA > rejections signal clearly that the message has not been delivered, and > you can also include an URL pointing to a web page with more detailed > information.

* mj: > Our autoreply message reads: "Your email has not been read nor > forwarded", which is also the case, forcing the sender to take action. No, it does not. An auto-reply message, even if it is actually read by the sender, can be ignored without penalty. An MTA rejection puts the ball into the sender's court because the message has never been accepted by the

Hi, First, I am very new to using Pigeonhole/Sieve with Dovecot and I am struggling with a problem which could be easy to solve but is just a lack of understanding on my end... We use a simple system for routing emails to different email users by postfixing the addresses with the actual user: xxxJohn at domain; yyyJohn at domain etc all will be delivered to user John. (This way John can

> On 20 Apr 2020, at 04:27, mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: > > Hi Ralph! > > Thanks for your reply! > > On 4/20/20 12:19 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: >> I suggest you don't use Sieve for this, but simply configure Postfix >> to reject messages to @old.domain.com with the desired message. MTA >> rejections signal clearly that the message has not

Hello. I'm trying to set up a vacation autoresponder but up to now, no success. I'm using dovecot managedsieve to set up the new filter and to my understanding it works correctly and it creates in the user's home the link .dovecot.sieve that points to sieve/managesieve.sieve ~$ cat .dovecot.sieve require ["date","relational","vacation"]; #

Hi, I think that the test "if not duplicate" could not work for our case, as the out of office should answer everytime, we only wants the redirect to not be sent as a duplicate for the users of the alias LIST. In other words we would like: 1) To redirect the e-mail directed to a single user (with out of office active) to LIST at domain.tld, so that every user of the LIST receives

Hi, I would like to ask how exactly the "password server =" smb.conf option works. The man pages say that the option is to "restrict Samba to to do all its username/password validation using a specific remote server" I know that we should normally leave it empty, to have samba auto-discover the DCs. But my question is: Suppose it's defined it like: > password

On 22-11-19 22:48, Ralph Seichter via dovecot wrote: > * Robert via dovecot: > >> We use a simple system for routing emails to different email users by >> postfixing the addresses with the actual user: xxxJohn at domain; >> yyyJohn at domain etc all will be delivered to user John. >> (This way John can invent a new email address on-the-fly and that will >> be

It's very difficult at least. I can't instantly think any sensible way forward, but you might be able to get somewhere using %a variable. Aki > On December 31, 2016 at 11:38 AM mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Does the lack of replies mean that what I'm asking is not possible? > > (or am I missing something SO obvious that nobody

On 10/16/2017 11:13 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:53:17 +0200 > mj via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> dbcheck tells us we have two "dangling forward links" that I am >> trying to get rid of. On my test domain, I have simply done >> >> ldbedit -e nano -H

Hello Dovecot community, I have an annoying problem with successfully activating Sieve vacation replies - on which I have been working hard the last days without success :( I'm using Dovecot 2.2 + Sendmail + Sieve connected with Horde web-mailer IMP H3 which is generally working fine. BUT: Whenever I activate vacation script in Horde (via Ingo) and send a test-mail to this account, the mail

Or. maybe it is the holidays and people actually have a life? On December 31, 2016 4:38:53 AM EST, mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: >Hi, > >Does the lack of replies mean that what I'm asking is not possible? > >(or am I missing something SO obvious that nobody bothers to point it >out..?) > >MJ > >On 12/29/2016 09:23 PM, mj wrote: >> Hi, >>

Hi, I would like to have two seperate imap listeners, with different authentication settings, but the mailstore and userbase etc will be identical. I know I can do this: > service imap-login { > inet_listener imap { > port = 143 > } > inet_listener imap2 { > port = 144 > } > } But I'm unsure how to configure imap/143 with "driver =

Hello, I'm using pigeonhole-0.2.3, it works fine. I tried to verify some build in checks of vacation concerning precedence or auto-submitted header lines. It looks like sieve-test ignores header lines like Auto-Submitted: auto-submitted Precedence: bulk Return-Path: MAILER-DAEMON at ... if I have a vacation script like require ["vacation", "regex",

Hi! You can ignore it, or you can change the socket permissions to 0666. service stats { unix_listener stats-writer { mode = 0666 } } Aki > On 23/10/2020 17:52 mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Nobody? > > It happens so rarely, and the system appears to be running fine > otherwise, should I just ignore it? > > Still

Hi, I am going further with dovecot configuration. Finally managed to configure roundcube 0.3 with managesieve plugin. And it works, although... not perfectly :( For some issues probably roundcube-managesieve is guilty, but simply the sieve plugins seems to work wrong. Here is my sieve file: require ["vacation","fileinto"]; # rule:[wakacje] if anyof (true) {

Hi, after upgrading to Dovecot 1.2x including the rewritten Sieve plugin replacing 'cmusieve', messages which have formerly been filed to a "Public/Mailing-List" maildir are no longer filtered correctly. The sieve script itself is included in the user's personal-script. The messages are dropped to the INBOX rather than the "Public Namespace Maildir". Log's

Hi, Reading http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3028#section-2.7.2 I thought that out-of-the-box dovecot can filter messages by matching header in UTF-8. But when I tested it, it failed : (I'm using 1.0.5 with sieve plugin) Here is my .dovecot.sieve file : ---------- require ["fileinto", "imapflags"]; if allof(header :contains "subject" "filtre") {

Hi, To make our AD more robust, I'd like to provide more than one dns forwarder, like for example: dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 However, this seems to break dns resolution completely (and without logging errors in the logs!): # Host test.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) With only one forwarder things work: $ test.com has address 208.64.121.161 Am I really allowed to specify only one

I case someone is interesed too, why it was not working: Am 14.01.19 um 20:22 schrieb Ralf Becker: > I have to reject office files for a certain domain plus notifying the > original recipient about the rejection too. > > require ["fileinto","reject","body","enotify","variables"]; > > if allof (address :contains