similar to: alternatives for imapproxy

> On 08/04/2020 16:11 Maciej Milaszewski <maciej.milaszewski at iq.pl> wrote: > > > Hi > System debian 8.11 and dovecot-2.2.36.4 My webmail is roundcube with > imapproxy. > > I have one problem. > > My dovecot servers is are in a cluster with keepalived like: > > dovecot1----VIP-IP--------dovecot2 > > All works fine > > I have a problem

Hi, I have two load-balanced dovecot servers using a single NFS mount. The version is 1.2.11. I chose this so that if one server goes down the other will take up the load, and if my load is too much for one server I just have to add more identical servers. It works, but I wish to move to SAN storage because the NFS server is exhibiting irregular performance. (I spent a lot of time with tcpdump to

Hello everyone, it's my first post here on this mailing list and I hope, I make it right. I posted a question on https://serverfault.com/questions/1031441/dovecot-as-proxy-with-submission and nobody was able to answer it. So I decided to push that question here (I'm talking about any new dovecot version and I've tested it with 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4)). I try to run a dovecot proxy

Hi Philon, now, it's time for "Mahlzeit" ;-) Sorry, that I read the wiki1 instead of wiki2. I thought the 1 means that it is server one of ... my fault. Also not reading the first line above the menu. My focus was really on the content. ;-) Also my problem with the doc of Dovecot2 proxy is, that the document https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/proxies/

Hi A few days ago I upgraded debian8 to debian9 dovecot is from source # 2.2.36.4 (baf9232c1): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24.2 (aaba65b7) # OS: Linux 4.9.0-13-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9.13 Today I get some times in logs: "dovecot-uidlist line 112: Invalid data" and I dont know why This is claster dovecot: dovecot1 - debian8 dovecot2 - debian8 dovecot3 - debian8

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.22a Severity: wishlist There is no support for imapproxy, and it would be a great help if it was added. Following are two sample lines from the syslog: Jun 11 09:36:55 MyHost in.imapproxyd[30845]: LOGOUT: '"MyUser"' from server sd [13] Jun 11 09:37:02 MyHost in.imapproxyd[30846]: LOGIN: '"MyUser"' (xxx.xxx.xxx.xx:yyyyy) on

We've been collecting some stats to see what kind of benefits UP/SquirrelMail's IMAP Proxy in for our SOGo webmail users. Dovecot is running in High-performance mode http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LoginProcess with authentication caching http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Caching During the weekend two servers (webmail3 and webmail4) has been running with local imapproxy and two servers

Hi, I'm planning on a new mail infrastructure which constists of multiple 'frontends' running webmail & public access pop/imap, which would communicate over imap/pop to 'backend mail stores'. My original idea was to run dovecot on the backends, use a predition on the frontends to proxy imap/pop and also run imapproxy in front of webmail [squirrelmail]. I've since

a EXAMINE INBOX [...] a OK [READ-ONLY] Select completed. a EXAMINE "" a NO Empty mailbox name. [Should be in authenticated mode with no active mailbox. But...] a STATUS INBOX (UIDVALIDITY) * STATUS "INBOX" (UIDVALIDITY 1255685337) a OK [CLIENTBUG] Status on selected mailbox completed. a UNSELECT a OK Unselect completed. a STATUS INBOX (UIDVALIDITY) * STATUS "INBOX"

Hello, b I have a situation were I want to be able to give teachers access to their Google apps for education email through Squirrelmail. The network that they are on blocks gmail. ?? I am able to get Squirrelmail to communicate with Gmail via imap.? I am looking at getting persistant imap connections to improve the user experience.? I have looked at IMAPPROXY? but this application is not

I just migrated from courier-imap to dovecot and dovecot is a lot faster. My only client is webmail on the same server as dovecot. Max ~10 users. Should I still run imapproxy like I did with courier? Does dovecot periodically empty the trash folder like courier does? I reduced the number of processes courier was running to save RAM and improve performance. Are there any performance tweaks I

Hi System debian 8.11 dovecot-2.2.36.4 and I have some warnings in log likes: Warning: Inotify watch limit for user exceeded, disabling. Increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches cat /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches 8192 in sysctl i change #fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 8192 #fs.inotify.max_user_instances = 16384 fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 16384 fs.inotify.max_user_instances =

Hi, I am testing dovecot with Outlook Mobile 5 (OM5), which is currently not working. OM5 connects, says "NOOP" and "CAPABILITY", does login correctly and simply loggs out after that telling the user that it could not download any messages. When I put an imapproxy[0] in front of dovecot, OM5 works perfectly well. That leads me to the thought, that something in the way dovecot

Timo, Is the director proxy inactivity timeout configurable? I just recently attempted to switch our production webmail's imapproxy system to use a pool of two directors and ran into problems with it apparently disconnecting them unexpectedly. I don't believe that it IDLEs, I think it just UNSELECTs to reset the state and then keeps the connection open until it's used again, or until

Hi again I'm trying to authenticate a user against an LDAP Server (well, our AD, but it can LDAP). This is my configuration: hosts = my.server.local auth_bind = yes ldap_version = 3 base = CN=Person,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=company,DC=local scope = subtree user_attrs = \ =home=/home/imapproxy/%u, \ =mail=maildir:/home/imapproxy/%u pass_attrs = uid=%u, userPassword=%w

Hi ! I have an old Courier IMAP and in front of it, I have put a proxy cache with the great Dovecot. SOGo webmail is connected to the proxy and works great (very very more fast) but I have a problem with Thunderbird : mailbox with ? SPECIAL USE ? aren't automatically detected. To make that works, I must : - in Dovecot : define the namespace inbox : ? prefix = ? and ? separator = . ? - in

Hi I have dovecot-2.2.36.4 (director) + 5 nodes dovecot (dovecot-2.2.36.4) What version of Solr do you recommend ? -- Maciej Mi?aszewski Starszy Administrator Systemowy IQ PL Sp. z o.o. Biuro Obs?ugi Klienta: e-mail: bok at iq.pl tel.: +48 58 326 09 90 - 94 fax: +48 58 326 09 99 Dzia? pomocy: https://www.iq.pl/pomoc Informacja dotycz?ca przetwarzania danych osobowych:

I am doing some research on Dovecots IMAP-Proxy features mentioned in <http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/ImapProxy> and <http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy>. The docs only mention SQL as backend to hold required data. Is it also possible to use LDAP? TIA, p at rick -- state of mind Agentur f?r Kommunikation, Design und Softwareentwicklung Patrick Koetter

Hi I update os from debian8 to debian9 # 2.2.36.4 (baf9232c1): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24.2 (aaba65b7) # OS: Linux 4.9.0-13-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9.13 All works fine but sometimes I get: Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(pop3): fork() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reached?) Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master:

There seems to be a problem with new user directories and the imapc backend. On a test setup I get the following error in the log: May 02 10:09:58 imap(user1 at domain.com): Error: Couldn't create mailbox list lock /tmp/tmp0Y5TMn/dovecot1/users/user1 at domain.com/imapc/mailboxes.lock: file_create_locked(/tmp/tmp0Y5TMn/dovecot1/users/user1 at domain.com/imapc/mailboxes.lock) failed: