similar to: Query change mdbox_rotate_size & mdbox_rotate_interval after sometime

I am using dovecot virtual maildir accounts. Is it possible to find last day of login for an account by checking the last modification time of the maildir files? Lefteris

Hello everyone, I am currently evaluating dovecot for our new email production servers (20k+ mailboxes) and found out something strange. I'm using those settings on Dovecot 2.2.4 (x86_64 / Slackware / compiled from sources) mdbox_rotate_size = 128M mdbox_rotate_interval = 1d mdbox_preallocate_space = yes with virtual users and location like : mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox I don't

Hello I am starting testing with dovecot 2.0.9. In my //etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf/ I have the following line: /mail_location = mdbox:/mydomain.org/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:INDEX=/mydomain.org/indexes/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n/ These are my questions (a long mail): *1? How should I restore from backup with mdbox & separate indexes?* I have read in dovecot list archive about restoring the full

Hello all, I have version 2.3.3-2 of dovecot and could see version 2.3.4-2 available from the repos. How is feedback after upgrade to 2.3.4-2? Any issues? Can I revert back to older version if I face any problems? Cheers/DP

Hello, I received an e-mail, this includes 9 forwarding, each with a file. These files are not removed from the e-mail and stored in the attachments-directory, although they are larger than 16 KB. For all files the "Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64" is set. The email is stored in completely in "m.00000034" ------------------------------------- doveconf: # 2.2.12:

On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 10:32, Ben Mulvihill <ben.mulvihill at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello again, > > I am still stuck I'm afraid. > > I now have doveadm backup working perfectly from > a small gmail mailbox (a few hundred messages), but > when I try the same configuration (apart from usernames > and passwords obviously) with a large gmail mailbox > (around

First of all i would like to thanks Timo for the excellent job done in dovecot. We are using it in you prodution server with about 5 millions of emails and it is pretty good, only a performance problens but i guess it is realated to ocfs2 that we are using. So lets begin: We are using dovecot 2.0.6 with maildir in an ocfs2 partiton. It is pretty slow access in peak time, but it is related to

I need to backup some of the mailboxes on our system. We are currently using mdbox with zlib compression plugin. The backups need to be maildir without compression. How can I accomplish this using dsync? The following just causes each msg file in maildir to be compressed as well. dsync -f -u user1 backup maildir:/var/tmp/user1 While this just causes the dsync to fail while spewing a bunch of

Hello I have read carefully about dbox (/http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox/) and I have some questions: - One of the main advantages (speed wise) of dbox over maildir is that index files are the only storage for message flags and keywords. What happens when we want to recover some messages from backup? With maildir we can rebuild message indexes, but I am not sure about

Hello, on my debian wheezy installation, I implemented fts plugin with solr as indexing system. I noticed that if a user creates a new folder, that folder it is ignored by dovecot indexing until a doveadm fts rescan is performed for that user. From that time on everything works ok on that folder. As a test I set fts_autoindex=yes and put in that folder a brand new mail never indexed before. in

Hello everybody, after upgrading dovecot on a debian wheezy installation from the standard package version (dovecot 2.1.7) to dovecot 2.2.13-11 from wheezy-backports, i noticed some errors in my logs... Apr 28 22:00:13 lmtp(4879, xxxxxxxxx at unipd.it): Info: copy from <lmtp DATA>: box=INBOX, uid=error, msgid=<20150428200011.47D801F32 at mydoom.unipd.it>, size=1523 They are not

Hello We are using SLAMD (Distributed Load Generation Engine, www.slamd.com) to benchmark our dovecot server (ldap auth). We are simulating 2.000 simultaneous logins and 20% of them fail. We saw the following errors in the log: Apr 12 09:40:07 buzon dovecot: auth: Error: ldap(correo,192.168.4.153): Request queue is full (oldest added 1 secs ago) Apr 12 09:40:07 buzon dovecot: auth: Error:

Hi! I've got a segfault in managesieve while using: sieve_extensions = -vacation -reject -spamtest -virustest -enotify -redirect The problem seems to lie in "-redirect". Reason for excluding "redirect" from sieve is my users should not use sieve to forward or redirect mails but use an external method (web-script to set LDAP attribute) which checks several things like

I am in troubles with compiling sieve scripts larger than 1MB. I see in logs following errors: Aug 19 13:10:26 mail dovecot: lmtp(z.z at xxx.xxx)<22117><uNBGHKIIPV9lVgAA5ldI4A>: Error: sieve: autoreply: line 16818: quoted string started at line 3 is too long (longer than 1048576 bytes) Aug 19 13:10:26 mail dovecot: lmtp(z.z at xxx.xxx)<22117><uNBGHKIIPV9lVgAA5ldI4A>:

Hello, If anyone has autoconfiguration going with their email domain please email me privately. I'd like to ask you some questions about your setup. What do you use? Thanks. Dave.

Hello, there are copies with different size in 3 mailboxes of the user sequentially about 3800 emails. why not something 2MB files? After the big file "m.00000034" with 14MB follow very many small ... ------------------------------------- doveconf: # 2.2.12: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 7.4 ext4 mail_attachment_dir = /var/mail/attachments

Hi, How to tune the size of each "m.xxx" file in mdbox format , in order to optimize the ratio size/number of files ? (I can see for instance more than 100 000 files in one directory due to very large mailbox size) If such parameter exists, what is the typical value ? Thanks Joan

That's what I was afraid of. Some users are trying to set up vacation message with inline picture. I am aware it's not ideal but in some cases it's needed. It would be nice if this configuration option works in the future. Regards, Zdenek On 8/19/20 5:01 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 19-8-2020 om 13:47 schreef Zden?k Z?me?n?k: >> I am in troubles with compiling

Hello, we are currently working on my project that aims at improving the register allocation scheme by identifying if the interference graphs are chordal or not. we are working on the llvm compiler .we are forcing the compiler to use PBQP register allocation scheme by an option of ' ' regalloc=pbqp ' during the execution of prgm. we have been succesfull in accessing the interference