similar to: Catchall with UserDB?

Hi, It seems I can?t google my way out of this one. I?m trying to set up spam/ham learning but getting nowhere. I tried Johannes Berg Antispam plugin, and syslog shows: Sep 20 22:22:06 proefmail imap: antispam: running mailtrain backend program /usr/lib/dovecot/retrain.sh Sep 20 22:22:06 proefmail imap: antispam: running mailtrain backend program /usr/lib/dovecot/retrain.sh Sep 20 22:22:06

I an trying to write a sieve action that will take mail that is addressed to a user only it is filed in a mailbox (e.g. "Direct") if it is to the email AND to any other email address, then file it in a mailbox named, e.g. "Cc". And if the mail is not addressed to the user at all, sieve does nothing with it. Message 1: to foo at example.com => Direct Message 2: to/cc foo at

On 18 Jul 2020, at 11:23, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > On 12/07/2020 22:47, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 12 Jul 2020, at 10:17, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: >>> @lbutlr skrev den 2020-07-12 16:43: >>>> I an trying to write a sieve action that will take mail that is >>>> addressed to a user only it is filed in a mailbox

Hi, I'd like to keep all emails coming from alom-alert at anydomain and not forward those but rest of the emails will be kept and forwarded as well. I put following in the .dovecot.sieve if header :contains "Sender" "alom-alert@" { keep; if not header :contains "Sender" "alom-alert@" { redirect "my at emailid on server"; redirect "xyz

On 12 Jul 2020, at 10:17, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > @lbutlr skrev den 2020-07-12 16:43: >> I an trying to write a sieve action that will take mail that is >> addressed to a user only it is filed in a mailbox (e.g. "Direct") if >> it is to the email AND to any other email address, then file it in a >> mailbox named, e.g. "Cc". And

Hi All, Please find the requested details: [root at testserver new]# doveconf -n # 2.2.10: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.4 (Maipo) xfs disable_plaintext_auth = no listen = * log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log mail_location = maildir:/kw/home/pop/%d/%n/Maildir/ passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/passwd driver =

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm using dovecot lda in a qmail / vpopmail testing environnement. I would like to replace vpopmail lda with dovecot's one , because of quotas , sieve filers, indexing while delivering ... Everything is working great, except the catchall. If I want to bounce, a first line like "# bounce-no-mailbox" in the .qmail file works,

Stefan Gofferje wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to have kinda catchall function for incoming sip > connections. A channel, where everybody could connect to by dialling the > url e.g. sip://guest@<myserver>, like the [guest] section in iax.conf. > I have played around a bit but any attempt to dial any > extension@<myserver> without prior registration leads to a

Hi all, I am having a small problem with a catch-all user I have setup in my Postfix/Dovecot setup. I am not 100% sure this is Dovecot related, but, logic tells me it is. I have a virtual user called @reinhold.dk setup to redirect to my main account, peter at reinhold.dk. If I send a spam mail (GTUBE) to peter at reinhold.dk, the mail is marked with Amavis x-headers as it should be. If I

I'd like comments (suggestions, improvements, messages that start with "you moron you forgot that. . .") on the following horrible dirty kludge to make a (nearly, with any luck) un-hackable set of shares available to specific users on the internet. On the Server, initially all packets bound for port 139 are rejected as the default policy. The server is connected to the internet full

Hi Benny and Dovecot, Thanks for the reply. Actually my question is, is it possible to verify anything now whether the email has been pulled by application/server from the "Maildir/new" or "Maildir/cur" folder in my POP3 server? at present I am not using lmtp yet. When I configured the outlook to access the one of the email box in the server, I get the email. But do we have

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> <br> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 15/03/2020 21:26 Peter < <a href="mailto:peter@pajamian.dhs.org">peter@pajamian.dhs.org</a>> wrote: </div> <div>

Hello, I've been trying to set up Postfix + Dovecot LMTP setup. Basic idea taken from https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP, but since Postfix is on different host inet listener is used instead of unix socket. Message delivery works. Messages are delivered to correct mailboxes, if they exist. But the problem is with logging on Dovecot side; i can not get any lmtp logs at

Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> writes: > Op 2013-10-15 om 20:03 schreef Ferenc W?gner: > >> lua: import Lua 5.2.2 > > Posted as [patch01/21] > Which was too big for the mailinglist. > So some other way is needed to share that information ... Hmm, yes. The series is available at https://github.com/wferi/syslinux as well (lua52 branch, based on upstream

Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner <Ferenc Wagner wferi at niif.hu> --- doc/syslinux.txt | 9 ++++----- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/syslinux.txt b/doc/syslinux.txt index 76cae24..0ec2695 100644 --- a/doc/syslinux.txt +++ b/doc/syslinux.txt @@ -163,11 +163,10 @@ IPAPPEND flag_val [PXELINUX only] ... based on the input from the DHCP/BOOTP or PXE boot

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> writes: > On 12/12/2013 12:31 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> Shall I rebase it to the current firmware head? >> >> Also, 5.2.3 was released a couple of days ago. It's a bugfix release. >> I made it into a sepearete commit (pushed). >> >> Better default Lua paths (source and binary) would be

On 12/03/2020 08:04, Jean-Daniel wrote: > > >> Le 11 mars 2020 ? 19:32, Juri Haberland <juri at koschikode.com> a ?crit : >> >> Hi list, >> >> I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames. >> Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+" to "+-" in both >> Postfix and Dovecot (using

On Oct 17, 2014, at 1:30 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > >> On 10/17/2014 12:19 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> writes: >> >>> I would like to do a short cycle for 6.04, because 64-bit support for >>> ext4 has come up as a very high priority. Therefore I do not want to

On 01/02/2014 04:09 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > > Issuing another make after this gave the previous error again: > > isolinux.asm:1102: error: TIMES value -4 is negative > I just fixed this one... it seems to be a consequence of merging in the MOVZX isolinux fix into the firmware branch. -hpa

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> writes: > I would like to do a short cycle for 6.04, because 64-bit support for > ext4 has come up as a very high priority. Therefore I do not want to > stuff too many things into the 6.04 release but hold them for 6.05. hpa, if 64-bit support for ext4 is mostly ready, you may want to release 6.04 in less than ten days, so that