similar to: Updated Roadmap for Dovecot?

Unfortunately we have not been able to work on this much, but also the JMAP spec was until very recently still being worked. We have open dialogue with the Thunderbird people, they haven't so far indicated any pressing need for JMAP in Dovecot. This said, JMAP is still very much in our roadmap. Perhaps just not as close as I initially thought. Aki On 21.5.2019 16.29, Tanstaafl via dovecot

Hi! We are working on including JMAP support to Dovecot. At this moment I cannot give any promise for exact version, but hopefully it will be part of v2.3 Aki Tuomi Dovecot Oy > On November 26, 2016 at 11:17 PM Andrew Jones <andrew at mykolab.com> wrote: > > > Hi Marcus > > Thanks for your helpful reply. > > Do you know what is going on with JMAP development

On Wed, May 22, 2019, at 23:43, Tanstaafl via dovecot wrote: > On Wed May 22 2019 05:44:59 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi > via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > Unfortunately we have not been able to work on this much, but also the > > JMAP spec was until very recently still being worked. We have open > > dialogue with the Thunderbird people,

On Wed May 22 2019 05:44:59 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > Unfortunately we have not been able to work on this much, but also the > JMAP spec was until very recently still being worked. We have open > dialogue with the Thunderbird people, they haven't so far indicated any > pressing need for JMAP in Dovecot. >

Hello Aki, Well, it has been over 3 years since I last asked... You had said initial JMAP support would hopefully make it into 2.3. Since it didn't, I'm hoiping it isn't too far away. There is some movement with the new Thunderbird team on this, but they can't really start serious work on adding JMAP support until there is a server implementation to test against. Is JMAP

Hi Aki, Someone just asked in the bug for Thunderbird for this, so... Is there a git branch that they could use to start playing with what is there? If not, any idea when that might happen? It sounds like someone following the Thunderbird bug is interested in working on this, but they obviously need something to test against. Thanks, Charles On 11/27/2016 5:28 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at

Hi Marcus Thanks for your helpful reply. Do you know what is going on with JMAP development into Dovecot 2.5? It's difficult to get any sort of information from the roadmap and there are no Dovecot forums. One of the main reasons I'm interested in JMAP is because of Roundcube Next and also the other clients it will power. Sadly, there has been little going on and having emailed Thomas,

On 2016-11-26 11:07:00 -0800, WJCarpenter wrote: > I don't know the answer to that question, but I am curious about something. > What client are you thinking about using with JMAP? I haven't found much. > (And much of the demo stuff at jmap.io seems to be busted in various ways.) roundcube-next builds on top of it. darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux

Hi Valery, On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:15 +0200, Valery Khamenya wrote: > Hi, > > where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this > and perhaps next year? About the best "roadmap" we have is the list of enhancements in Bugzilla:

On Sat Feb 24 2018 11:32:05 GMT-0500 (Eastern Daylight Time), Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >> On 23 February 2018 at 23:12 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: >> Ok, so, I'm still unclear... >> >> what cache are we talking about? Are you saying that there is a limit to >> how many emails dovecot can store in a single...

FYI... I've posted an updated roadmap for the 3.0 release schedule at http://www.samba.org/samba/roadmap-3.html Looks like a lot of documentation needs to be done :-) Enjoy..... cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team

answer is not yet. we are going to implement it when we get free resources to do it. ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy -------- Original message --------From: Steinar Bang <sb at dod.no> Date: 21/09/2017 17:28 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: JMAP support in Dovecot >>>>> Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > We are working on including JMAP support to

Hi, I''m very interested in migrating some apps to ruby and wxRuby. Is there a rough estimate of when wxRuby will support wxWidgets 2.6.0? Are there specific tasks that require volunteers?

I don't know the answer to that question, but I am curious about something. What client are you thinking about using with JMAP? I haven't found much. (And much of the demo stuff at jmap.io seems to be busted in various ways.) Andrew Jones wrote on 11/26/2016 10:43 AM: > Hi there, > > I understand there were discussions to try and develop JMAP support for Dovecot. > > Is

Hi, where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this and perhaps next year? Especially would be interesting to know about * planned features for PS3 Cell processor -- as well as for Wii, Xbox360 CPUs * multithreading in general * possibly coming changes in major versioning and related issues * other interesting featuring comments on current status to above listed items are also

Hello, Is there any ETA set for JMAP support? Thank you! >> On 11/27/2016 5:28 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >> Hi! >> We are working on including JMAP support to Dovecot. At this moment I cannot give any promise for exact version, but hopefully it will be part of v2.3 >> >> Aki Tuomi >> Dovecot Oy -- Best regards, Martynas Bendorius

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:14:02 -0500 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 11/17/2016 10:58 AM, Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote: > > I have over 620K emails in over 1000 folders. This turns Thunderbird > > into an all day affair, just to refresh its caches. > > There are lots of knobs you can tweak to improve the situation, but >

On 13.03.2018 13:40, Tanstaafl wrote: > On Sat Feb 24 2018 11:32:05 GMT-0500 (Eastern Daylight Time), Aki Tuomi > <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >>> On 23 February 2018 at 23:12 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: >>> Ok, so, I'm still unclear... >>> >>> what cache are we talking about? Are you saying that there is a limit to

On 21 Mar 2015, at 10:14, Florian Sager <sager at agitos.de> wrote: > > Hi Timo, > > congrats to the merger with OX. > > Currently the implementation of RFC 5257, ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1, has > only low priority on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap > I want to explain a scenario that would benefit from annotation support > to - maybe - increase the priority in your

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Valery Khamenya wrote: > where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this > and perhaps next year? We generally have not published a road map like this because it is very difficult to do it in a meaningful way. Because LLVM is largely driven by volenteers and because noone working on it guarantees that they will finish a project that they start, we