similar to: doveadm(nfsnobody) Error

Hi A datacenter I use provides mountable nfs shares that are provided through a subnet, the only person having access to the nfs share is me. If I do this: mount -t nfs 192.168.53.21:/USERNAME /mnt/share/ then I get the share: [root at hostname /mnt/share] #>ls -la total 12 drwxrwxrwx 2 nfsnobody nfsnobody 4096 Oct 9 18:04 . drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Oct 9 17:55 ..

Hi, I just had a couple of questions about nfsnobody. We run a very large NFS infrastructure based off of a NetApp, and we're been discussing whether or not it is necessary to have 64 bit nfsnobody as 4294967294. I understand the reasoning behind this (2^32 - 2 gives you a max UID), but we're having issues since we run multiple architectures. The UID doesn't play nice across

The following manifest is causing an error/warning and permissions are not set. i do not understanding why: file { "/diskless/swaps": ensure => directory, owner => nfsnobody, group => nfsnobody, mode => 1777; } The error is: Fri Sep 21 14:53:05 EST 2007

1) A lot (but not all) of my smbd / nmbd logs are going to /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/samba/ I tried a couple of things in syslog.conf, but just don't know the magic word for samba logs. 2) I'm getting lots of "couldn't find service" errors. I had: [data] path = /data read only = no public = yes browseable = yes writeable

Hi Everyone, I have been trying to setup an NFS v4 File Server but have come across an odd issue. Mounting the /nfs4exports/share appears to be successful and the information displayed about partition size and free space seem correct but if I try to do anything inside the mounted directory the client will just hang. Does anyone have any idea what I am missing?? I have try disabling all

Hi, On 09/21/2017 07:32 PM, Pierre C wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to use glusterfs in an environment where storage servers > are managed by an IT service - myself :) - and several users in the > organization can mount the distributed fs. The users are root on their > machines. > As far as I know about glusterfs, a root client user may impersonate any > uid/gid

Hi, [Note: I''ve been saving up my puppet questions for a free moment so pardon my bombardment of the list] What''s the best way to set up mounts and mountpoints with puppet? I am currently using something like: ---- class software_depot_client { # create NFS mountpoint file { "/mnt/nfs/repository": path => "/mnt/nfs/repository", ensure =>

On 12/11/2020 14:19, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: > > On 11/12/2020 8:52 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 12/11/2020 13:27, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 11/12/2020 8:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>>>> Hi Louis, >>>>> I've looked into that

Hi list, this problem is already known and I'm sorry to bother if an acceptable workaround was already debated on the list. I was getting trouble with a 'grep something /var/log*' which caused the "Memory exhausted" message. With some deeper search I found the lastlog file in /var/log/ to be 1.2T sized. This seems to come from the nfsnobody's uid to be 4294967294 on

On 04/13/2016 09:23 AM, TomK wrote: > On 4/13/2016 1:33 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:24:16PM -0400, TomK wrote: >>> On 4/12/2016 5:08 PM, John Ferlan wrote: >>>> Having/using a root squash via an NFS pool is "easy" (famous last >>>> words) >>>> >>>> Create some pool XML (taking the example I

After trying a couple of Linux forums & no help I'm hoping that somebody on the samba list knows how to solve this issue. I'm having a problem with CIFS. This is a fresh installation of Fedora Core 5. I have 3 XP machines that I mount by CIFS in my fstab. CIFS mounts the shares with no problem. I can view and read files on the shares. The problem I have is when I try to copy a file

I am still in the familiarisation and testing phase of my puppet implementation, and have a question for the enlightened: Is there an upper limit to the numeric user ID that puppet recognises? Here is what I have so far: System is RHEL4, puppet 0.23.1 All users are defined in LDAP rather than in /etc/password, and their numeric user IDs are sourced from LDAP as well. These numeric IDs

Hello I have installed Redhat Linux 9 and Samba 3.0.2a from the Source. I have two Win2003 server for the domain "sambadomain.local": PDC: rootserver 10.10.1.1 Subnet 255.255.0.0 DNS-Master: dnsserver 10.10.1.2 Subnet 255.255.0.0 Runs also dhcp and wins I made the references to these two Servers (DNS, DHCP) in my Linux-Server. Linux-Server: samba 10.10.1.4 Subnet 255.255.0.0

Hi, I just had a go at enabling ACLs with 1.0b5. As per the docs I've done the configuration bit: protocol imap { .. mail_plugins = acl } ... plugin { acl = vfile:/usr/local/etc/dovecot-acls } and created the dovecot-acls file. When I start dovecot, it hangs for a few seconds and dies with this: [root at redback root]# /etc/init.d/dovecot restart Shutting down IMAP daemon

Sorry for being such a newbie when it comes to scripting. Created a directory for the backups on the network mounted volume. Changed the appropriate path and am getting this: dsync(root): Error: user nfsnobody: Initialization failed: Namespace 'INBOX.': mkdir(/mnt/maelstrombackups/vmailbackup/nfsnobody) failed: Permission denied (euid=5000(vmail) egid=5000(vmail) missing +w perm:

On 4/13/2016 10:00 AM, John Ferlan wrote: > > On 04/13/2016 09:23 AM, TomK wrote: >> On 4/13/2016 1:33 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:24:16PM -0400, TomK wrote: >>>> On 4/12/2016 5:08 PM, John Ferlan wrote: >>>>> Having/using a root squash via an NFS pool is "easy" (famous last >>>>> words)

On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 04:09:14PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: > Yes, sure. Then can you give some comments about following TODO list? > For which is necessary to add for users and which is not? > Although we know almost all of the features we have in sysprep can be done > by "--script" feature, right? > > > " > add features to remove the following files or

On 12/11/2020 13:27, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: > > On 11/12/2020 8:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>> Hi Louis, >>> I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done? >>> By the way, even with your NFS translation fix (which doesn't work >>> for me because

Hi All, I would like to use glusterfs in an environment where storage servers are managed by an IT service - myself :) - and several users in the organization can mount the distributed fs. The users are root on their machines. As far as I know about glusterfs, a root client user may impersonate any uid/gid since it provides its uid/gid itself when it talks to the bricks (like nfsv3). The thing

Can somebody with experience making a RedHat Fedora Core 3 server with Samba installed work in a Windows 2003 Active Domain please give me some pointers? I have a small installation with one Windows 2003 Server running as a domain controller for about 10 Windows XP machines. This is working just fine. I decided that I wanted to add a RedHat Fedora Core 3 server as a Mail server, running Cyrus IMAP