similar to: My sieve is failing

On 30 Oct 2020, at 12:34, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: > I am not sure about the $1. I think filter just pipes the message (or part of the message. > > I will see what happens without the echo I suppose. > > Nope, still the same. > > 32: starting `:contains' match with `i;ascii-casemap' comparator: > 32: matching value `<!DOCTYPE

In order to simplify auto-response suppression and other filtering, I want to synthesise an Auto-Submitted header on notification mails that should have them but do not. In a sieve file I add the following: if anyof ( header :contains ["From","Sender"] ?info at example.com" ) { if header :contains "Subject" [" just joined "," just left

Hi Everybody, I'm using dovecot 2.1.14 from http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ with debian squeeze stable. In general, sieve works fine for me, but "addheader :last ..." from the editheader extension causes a crash when it processes a message. I was able to narrow this down a bit: It only happens if "addheader :last" is the first editheader command executed in a script.

Since switching to lmtp in dovecot, mail to user+mailboix at example.com does not get saved in ?.mailbox? as it did with LDA, instead it gets saved into the INBOX. If it matters, these are users who do NOT have a ~/.active_sieve file. I could understand (though it would bene a bit annoying) if the save overrode this mechanism. I did add lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes in the protocol lmtp

Hi, We're using Dovecot 2.1.16 with Pigeonhole 0.3.4. Mail is delivered by exim4 to the dovecot LDA. Sometimes users are unable to delete headers. I've narrowed the problem down to preceding the deleteheader command with a query against the body. A simple example: """ require ["body", "editheader", "fileinto"]; if body :contains

I?ve bene looking for examples on how to do this, but so far am coming up short. I want to check certain messages for a reply-ro header and if it is present, rewrite it to X-Reply-To: and then add my own reply-to header. I don?t see anything in the various sieve examples I?ve found on altering the actual message. There is the editheader extension, but I failed to find documentation or examples

I've done extensive searches, and there is virtually no information about actual implementations of the draft Sieve Editheader Extension (which provides 'addheader' and 'deleteheader' actions): http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-editheader-11.txt Is anyone currently working on this for Dovecot Sieve? If not, are there any plans to do so? And before I

Hello, i do some tests with sieve editheader extensions. deleteheader and addheader are working, but i noticed that new headerlines are always prepended to current header. So new lines can be found always on top. I am looking for a possibility to edit a headerline in place, without moving the new line to top of stack(replaceheader?). It is not looking good if a Subject-Line suddenly moves to

Op 2/16/2018 om 3:36 AM schreef @lbutlr: > Before I spend a lot of time trying to replicate a procmail script that automatically sorts list mail into mailboxes based on the List-ID header (and possibly some other data) I thought I'd check if someone had already done this for sieve. > > Basically, what I do now in procmail is > > 1. Get the listname from the List-ID header (or

On 4/8/2015 4:53 PM, Patrick Lion wrote: > Hey folks, > > ive already made a bug report in the gentoo bugtracker last year. In the > meantime after some releases the error persists with the current dovecot > and pigeonhole versions. > > Please see my bug report at gentoo mailinglist: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 > > Okay, here are some

Hello. We have currently set dovecot.sieve to insert the text "[SPAM]" at the beginning of an e-mail's subject when it's X-Spam-Score is above 80%. After we set our system as stated the following errors occur: 1) When an e-mail's subject contains control characters like [Ctrl+V|^V], dovecot.sieve terminates with an error and an e-mail is not able to be sent. When a MIME

Hey folks, ive already made a bug report in the gentoo bugtracker last year. In the meantime after some releases the error persists with the current dovecot and pigeonhole versions. Please see my bug report at gentoo mailinglist: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 Okay, here are some informations: Steps to Reproduce: add "editheader" to sieve options or

Hi there, on my mail server (postfix, dovecot 2.2.27 in Debian 9) I have an automatic forwarding (with sender_bcc_maps in Postfix) for all the emails sent in smtp from the same server, that are then put in the Sent folder with a sieve rule. In this way, however, when a user sends an e-mail to himself, both copies end up in the Sent folder and it's not good. To resolve, I tried using

On 13 Jun 2018, at 12:51, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > Are you sure your sieve even gets executed? Anything in the logs? can you enable mail_debug=yes and try again? > Can you post your doveconf -n? I am not sure. I?ve made a couple of changes (put the default script and compiled script into their own folder and defined sieve_global), but still no joy. In fact,

On 29 Sep 2020, at 01:21, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: >> On 29/09/2020 09:09 @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: >> Is it possible to take the contents of a mailbox and feed them to the account's .active_sieve file for reprocessing? > You can use imap sieve refilter. https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/sieve/plugins/imapfilter_sieve/

Op 3/3/2018 om 9:35 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: > Op 3/3/2018 om 9:15 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: >> Op 3/3/2018 om 2:57 AM schreef Jan: >>> Hello! >>> >> We're looking into it. > Right, this is not reproducible in the test suite, but I can reproduce > it when I replicate your setup. I created a special test suite that reproduces the problem reliably. This

On 02 Apr 2020, at 03:48, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > On 2.4.2020 11.07, @lbutlr wrote: >> Is there any reason that a .active_sieve file would not load because it is a symbolic link? The target of the link is readable by the mail user, but instead of getting the trace for the .active_sieve file, I only get the trace for the default sieve file. > > Does

Op 3/3/2018 om 9:15 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: > Op 3/3/2018 om 2:57 AM schreef Jan: >> Hello! >> > We're looking into it. Right, this is not reproducible in the test suite, but I can reproduce it when I replicate your setup. Regards, Stephan. >> Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) >> Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) >> >> After the update to pigeonhole

Op 3/3/2018 om 2:57 AM schreef Jan: > Hello! > We're looking into it. Regards, Stephan. > Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) > Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) > > After the update to pigeonhole version 0.4.22 the following > configuration does not work. With version 0.4.21 it works. > > dovecot.conf (only sieve configuration) >

Hello! Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) After the update to pigeonhole version 0.4.22 the following configuration does not work. With version 0.4.21 it works. dovecot.conf (only sieve configuration) --------------------------------------------------------------- managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope