similar to: shared folder name or public folder with mail address

On 14.02.2020 11:44, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: ... > > The sorting in the according public folder happens in a global sieve > script before user scripts are fireing. It is combined with the ?+? > notation in postfix for sub addresses and an special ?listadm? user > > postfix: > | > listadm+Verteiler/info@$DOMAIN > |

On 2/14/20 11:44 AM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: > > Hello! > > we are about to move from cyrus to dovecot and have one open issue > for that migration. > With cyrus we have "shared/" folders with a name that is self defined like > shared/project-xyz > but the email address for direct

On 15.02.2020 12:16, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: ... > the sieve part seems to be very tricky. > My test is now working with a public folder and I have a > "sieve_before" script in place which works for rules of the > private namespace. > > But when the rule shall "fileinto" a public folder, the mail isn't > filtered (moved) and

On 2/14/20 2:23 PM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 14 Feb 2020, at 14:05, Armin Schindler wrote: > >> On 2/14/20 11:44 AM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: >>> On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: >>> >>> ??? Hello! > > [?] > >>> For our new setup (planned with CentOS 8, waiting for the official repo for the latest dovecot >>>

On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: > Hello! > > we are about to move from cyrus to dovecot and have one open issue > for that migration. > With cyrus we have "shared/" folders with a name that is self defined > like > shared/project-xyz > but the email address for direct delivery to that folder my be > different > (not project-xyz at

On 15 Feb 2020, at 10:43, Armin Schindler wrote: > On 14.02.2020 11:44, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: >> On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: > ... >> >> The sorting in the according public folder happens in a global sieve >> script before user scripts are fireing. It is combined with the >> ?+? >> notation in postfix for sub addresses and an

On 15 Feb 2020, at 12:27, Armin Schindler wrote: > On 15.02.2020 12:16, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > ... >> the sieve part seems to be very tricky. >> My test is now working with a public folder and I have a >> "sieve_before" script in place which works for rules of the >> private namespace. >> >> But when the rule shall

Hallo, Ihre E-Mailadresse "r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch" wurde aus dem Verteiler entfernt. URL: http://www.fueralles.de/cgi-bin/nsl_pro/newsletter.cgi?id=steinfeuerfred Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen Ihr Newsletter-Team

Hi all, I would like to announce the first release of the chan_capi channel driver on sourceforge.net The package is available for download with name chan_capi-cm-0.5 and is the current CVS HEAD. It is derived from the chan_capi-0.4.0PRE1 of kapejod. The main changes are: - complete rework - fix race-conditions - fix call state handling - rework of debug/verbose messages - added capiFax

Hello, sorry for beeing off-topic here. But can anyone confirm that there is a problem reverse resolving lists.digium.com (216.207.245.17) ? Because of this problem, my mail server will not accept mails from lists.digium.com (it is configured to accept valid DNS only). Armin

Hi all, it took a while, but on sourceforge.net I added the new release 0.6 of chan_capi-cm driver. Note: dial string and capi.conf has changed. The main changes are: - added 'relaxdtmf'. - more BSD compatibility - correct PROGRESS handling - added verbose text for capi info/reason error messages. - use correct facility-selector for echo-cancel - added application capicommand() for CAPI

Hello configuration as follows, dial-out works: capi.conf: [hfcpci] ;;PointToPoint (55512-0) isdnmode=MSN incomingmsn=* ;msn=61 controller=1 devices=2 context=incoming extensions.conf: [incoming] exten => _XX,1,Playback(demo-abouttotry) exten => _XX,n,Dial,SIP/xlite1 exten => _XX,n,HangUp When call is placed, the following debug info is shown, after the last line, it stalls until

Can someone share pointers to Asterisk's Dialogic support? Which boards are supported, driver status, and etc. Thnx

Hi all, I use asterisk cvs-head from last week and was wondering why my macros are not working like I expected. A macro will be aborted if one application returns error (-1), but some applications (like ChanIsAvail() in my case) do return -1. So when I want to use ChanIsAvail() in a macro, it does not work if the channel is not available, because the macro is not executed on n+101. The macro

On 30.08.2016 17:37, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 02:38:16PM +0200, Armin Schindler wrote: > >> we use a meshed VPN with TINC to connect 7 offices. >> Some office are in other countries and use other ISPs. The connection >> between some ISPs (peering partners) are not that good. This means we >> have packet loss between those direct connections.

Hello all, we are using tinc 1.0.24 with 6 hosts (endpoints). Quality of service is used with prio qdisc on all network interfaces. This means depending on the TOS value of the IP header IP-packets will get a priority queue on the network interface. Packets from TINC (UDP 655) maybe reordered using these queues to send out high-prio (VoIP) packets first. Could this create a problem on the

Hello Armin, > The card is telling: > > CAPI INFO 0x34a2: No circuit / channel available > > so the other channel must be in use by something else. > Maybe another device on the ISDN line? > I have tested it several times now and always entered "capi info" before and after the call. The answer was always: Contr1: 2 B channels total, 2 B channels free. I'm

Hello all, we use a meshed VPN with TINC to connect 7 offices. Some office are in other countries and use other ISPs. The connection between some ISPs (peering partners) are not that good. This means we have packet loss between those direct connections. To avoid this direct connection, I would like to tell TINC to use a defined other host to route the packets to. E.g. instead of doing direct

Hello Armin, hello List I'm trying to get chan_capi working with asterisk from debian stable (asterisk 1.0.7, the debian version number is 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2). I managed to get it compiled by providing my own version of ast_copy_string. This is an Austrian PTP line. I can do outgoing calls fine (no comprehensive tests yet). For incoming calls, I'm getting "No answer" on the

On 15.02.2020 14:45, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 15 Feb 2020, at 12:27, Armin Schindler wrote: > > On 15.02.2020 12:16, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > ... > > the sieve part seems to be very tricky. > My test is now working with a public folder and I have a > "sieve_before" script in place which works for rules of the >