similar to: Dovecot - Upgrade Solr 7.7.2 to 8.4.1

Hi, thanks for your answer. I confirm, mitigate this issue is very very easy. There are other issues with high severity for example CVE-2019-17558. Description: Apache Solr 5.0.0 to Apache Solr 8.3.1 are vulnerable to a Remote Code Execution through the VelocityResponseWriter I think for this issue there is only a solution, upgrade Solr to 8.4. It's Correct? So, with Dovecot is it possible

Hi Philon, Thanks a lot for your thoughts! Can I ask you if using Solr improved things for you? I have a mailbox with 15 years of e-mail and searching things take a long time. On 04.02.2020 09:39, Philon wrote: > Hi Francis, > > next to fts-solr there was fts-lucene. But that Lucene there seems > heavily outdated why the Dovecot docs also suggest using Solr. > Elasticsearch

Am 04.02.20 um 12:37 schrieb Peter Chiochetti: > Am 04.02.20 um 11:46 schrieb Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay: >> Hi Philon, >> >> Thanks a lot for your thoughts! >> >> Can I ask you if using Solr improved things for you? I have a mailbox >> with 15 years of e-mail and searching things take a long time. > > Here, SOLR itself searches a quarter million

I updated fts-xapian to make it compatible with dovecot 2.2 On 2020-02-04 12:37, Peter Chiochetti wrote: > Am 04.02.20 um 11:46 schrieb Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay: > >> Hi Philon, >> >> Thanks a lot for your thoughts! >> >> Can I ask you if using Solr improved things for you? I have a mailbox with 15 years of e-mail and searching things take a long

On 2020-01-22 8:42 am, Domenico Pastore wrote: > Hello, > I have Dovecot configured with Solr for the indexes. > > I have need your support for upgrade solr 7.7.2 to 8.4.1. > Solr 7.7.2 has a security issue CVE-2019-12409. > > It's possible upgrade of Solr? > Dovecot work correctly with Solr 8.x? > > The Solr documentation recommended after updating: >

> On 29/05/2020 20:12 Ralph Seichter <abbot at monksofcool.net> wrote: > > > * David Mehler: > > > I'd ideally like to back up all the mails in the maildir location, > > copy that over, load in my configuration files, and bring the system > > back up. > > I don't think this qualifies as "ideal" for migration. My recommendation

Hi there, I got successfully to replicate my mail server to another dovecot install using dsync, mainly for redundancy, and it works great. I want to try to install fts, as some of the mailboxes have tens of thousands of messages, and it takes minutes to get some results when searching via IMAP on a Roundcube interface. I want to experiment with fts-solr first, and firstly on my redundant

Hi, I am finally trying to use an fts engine with dovecot. My version is 2.3.7.2 under Ubuntu 20.04. I installed solr 7.7.3 and then 8.6.0 to see if this was a version-related error. I copied the schema from 7.7.0 as many people said this was fine. I get the following error when trying to reindex a user's mailbox: doveadm(francis at francisaugusto.com): Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed:

Hi, I want to do a simple backup of my maildir. I read here that maildirlock is not to count on in the future and the recommended option was to use doveadm backup. However, it seems that this requires to setup another dovecot server. My questions are: - How much to I need to configure this new server? Do I need to setup user by user, or even install postfix (that's where my users are

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On 10/2/20 4:59 am, Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay wrote: > What I do: > > 1 - I ran a maildirlock command to my mail folder 2 - I then rsync > the folder where my maildirs are, as well as the indexes, to a > remote location If rsync is not fast... then how about doing a snapshot and then rsync off the snapshot? (I do rsync

Hello, I have Dovecot configured with Solr for the indexes. I have need your support for upgrade solr 7.7.2 to 8.4.1. Solr 7.7.2 has a security issue CVE-2019-12409. It's possible upgrade of Solr? Dovecot work correctly with Solr 8.x? The Solr documentation recommended after updating: "It is always strongly recommended that you fully reindex your documents after a major version

Hi, I'm trying to use doveadm backup but I'm having a few issues. When trying locally: `doveadm backup -D -A maildir:/usr/local/backup` It results that no mailbox is separated by user - all seems to sync on the same folder, messing up with the folder structure of the original maildir. When trying remotely: `doveadm backup -D -A -N ssh -i mykey root at myremotebackup.com:/backup

> On 31 May 2020, at 11:13, Laura Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp at protonmail.ch> wrote: > > ? > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ??????? Original Message ??????? >> On Sunday, 31 May 2020 09:35, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> A couple of notes on this quite useful script: >> >> My

On 2020-05-30 07:49, Admin Beckspaced wrote: > Am 29.05.2020 um 17:37 schrieb Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay: >> Hi, >> >> I want to do a simple backup of my maildir. I read here that >> maildirlock is not to count on in the future and the recommended >> option was to use doveadm backup. However, it seems that this requires >> to setup another dovecot

On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay wrote: > Another related question: if backing up on another location on the same > computer, using -A doesn't seem to recreate the structure of the original > Maildir (for example, /var/mail/%d%n). > > Is there a way to do that? If I understand your question correctly (I may be missing context), you can use dsync for that,

Hello, Was thinking it would be wise to backup my server, in case anything "bad" ever happened, so that I could quickly get up to speed. 1. clone the whole drive -- which might be the best to ensure I keep the whole system working. 2. But, what about, if I just wanted to backup my Email server components? Postfix - which I think is just config files, and Dovecot - I think there is a

Op 16-9-2019 om 11:53 schreef Domenico Pastore via dovecot: > > Hi, > > I have other information. > > I analyzed the core dump: > > (gdb) core 22534 > [New LWP 22534] > Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server...Reading > symbols from > /usr/lib/debug/usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server.debug...done. > done. > [Thread debugging using

Hi Stephan, thanks for your replay. This is bt full output: (gdb) bt full #0 clear (this=0x0) at /usr/src/debug/clucene-core-2.3.3.4/src/core/CLucene/util/VoidMap.h:123 No locals. #1 lucene::search::FieldSortedHitQueue::_shutdown () at /usr/src/debug/clucene-core-2.3.3.4/src/core/CLucene/search/FieldSortedHitQueue.cpp:60 No locals. #2 0x00007f7dc5eabe96 in _lucene_shutdown () at

Hi, do you have the same problem with lucene? I collected a strace on the dovecot process during indexing: [pid 31339] execve("/usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server", ["dovecot-devel01/doveadm-server"], [/* 18 vars */] <unfinished ...> [pid 30711] --- SIGCHLD {si_signo=SIGCHLD, si_code=CLD_KILLED, si_pid=30932, si_uid=0, si_status=SIGSEGV, si_utime=3, si_stime=1} ---

Hi, I have other information. I analyzed the core dump: (gdb) core 22534 [New LWP 22534] Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server.debug...done. done. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by