similar to: Vacation use different SMTP server

Thanks for idea but it won't work for me as 'internal domains' can be anything, including gmail.com (and i don't know which of them are really internal/local, this is decided by sending SMTP everytime something is sent, based on MX records). Problem is that Dovecot/Sieve is using wrong SMTP server (one used for receiving e-mails which should NEVER be used for sending [and

Op 28-1-2020 om 19:20 schreef azurit at pobox.sk: > Really no more info? You could do something with the sendmail_path or submission_host settings. Regards, Stephan. > > > > > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > >> Thanks for idea but it won't work for me as 'internal domains' can be >> anything, including gmail.com (and i don't know which of them are

Is Pigeonhole really using LDA for sending? My Dovecot is using LMTP, not LDA. Cit?t Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl>: > Op 28-1-2020 om 19:20 schreef azurit at pobox.sk: >> Really no more info? > > > You could do something with the sendmail_path or submission_host settings. > > Regards, > > Stephan. > >> >> >> >> >>

Really no more info? Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > Thanks for idea but it won't work for me as 'internal domains' can > be anything, including gmail.com (and i don't know which of them are > really internal/local, this is decided by sending SMTP everytime > something is sent, based on MX records). Problem is that > Dovecot/Sieve is using wrong SMTP server

Hi, I had the same problem and solved it at architectural design level. Instead of forcing Sieve to use a different SMTP server, I declared some transports in the sending SMTP server to force it to route internal domains directly to receiving SMTP server without going to the Internet. So, internal mails remains on internal network and there is only one SMTP server for all mail traffic. Sorry, I

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 10, 2017 at 1:45 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> >> >> On July 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> i'm trying to

> On July 11, 2017 at 11:50 AM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > > > > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > > > Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > > > >>> On July 10, 2017 at 1:45 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > >>> >

Cit?t Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi>: >> On 12 Jul 2017, at 10.36, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> Backends don't have access to user database and i wanted to keep it >> like this :( > > Then probably your only possibility is to update last_login > information with the authentication > policy framework introduced in dovecot 2.2.25: >

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 11, 2017 at 7:51 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> is it possible to run a post-login script on proxy side? When a user >> is 'proxied' away, the standard post-login script seems to be skipped. >> I want to update last login datetime but only proxy has access to user

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> i'm trying to configure Dovecot proxy with user authentication on >> proxy side only, so backends will authenticate using master password >> (proxy is configured to send it). The problem is that Dovecot, on >>

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > On 2017-08-27 12:06, Harald Leithner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It seams that IX didn't Motive Themen Version change. >> >> Thx >> >> Harald > > Try http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian.new/ > > Aki Hi, i always wonder why is anyone using this repository? There is a big warning in the wiki that

Hi, is it possible to use 'doveadm expunge' with static user database? Or can i, somehow, tell dovecot the directory location where i need to do an expunge? Thank you. azur

Hi, i'm trying to configure Dovecot proxy with user authentication on proxy side only, so backends will authenticate using master password (proxy is configured to send it). The problem is that Dovecot, on backends, is telling me that i need to configure at least one auth mechanism: auth: Fatal: No passdbs specified in configuration file. LOGIN mechanism needs one The master auth

Hi, i'm using Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian Wheezy) and output from LIST command looks strange: C: 4 LIST () "" (INBOX INBOX.Karantena INBOX.Spam) RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN)) S: * LIST () "." "INBOX" S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Karantena" S: * STATUS "INBOX.Karantena" (UNSEEN 0) S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Spam" S: * STATUS

>> On 18 October 2018 at 15:49 azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> is it possible to use 'doveadm expunge' with static user database? Or >> can i, somehow, tell dovecot the directory location where i need to > do >> an expunge? Thank you. >> >> >> azur > >

Cit?t Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>: > On 29 Nov 2018, at 15.46, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> is this a know problem? Newest Dovecot 2.3.4 package from >> repo.dovecot.org , Debian Stretch (fully upgraded). >> >> >> >> Nov 29 14:25:11 server00 dovecot: lmtp(16854): Panic: file >> ostream-dot.c: line 208

Hi, i'm trying to implement malbox aliases but it's not fully working as i expected. This is my configuration: mail_plugins = acl mailbox_alias plugin { mailbox_alias_old = INBOX/Odoslane mailbox_alias_new = INBOX/SentTest } That 'INBOX/' must be there because of this (we were moving from Courier IMAP): namespace inbox { type = private prefix = INBOX/ separator = /

Hi, is it possible to run a post-login script on proxy side? When a user is 'proxied' away, the standard post-login script seems to be skipped. I want to update last login datetime but only proxy has access to user database (so i cannot run it on backends). azur

Hi, how much would it cost to sponsor a complete* fix of mailbox aliases? https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2015-June/101176.html https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-September/105459.html * i.e. without any workarounds like disabling mailbox_list_index Thank you for info. azur

Hi, is it, somehow, possible to distinguish between multiple simultaneous logins in MailLog plugin? For example, which login deleted which message. Is that p[lugin able to log e.g. session ID? azur