Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Lookup master userdb used with GSSAPI causes auth-worker to report "Error: BUG: PASSL had invalid passdb ID""
2006 Feb 22
1
BUG: PASSL had invalid passdb num
With current cvs:
Feb 22 14:30:32 ymmv dovecot: auth-worker(default): BUG: PASSL had invalid
passdb num
never seen that before.
2007 Aug 01
3
dovecot: child 1690 (auth-worker) killed with signal 11
Hi there,
I've been seeing this for quite a while now, but only today finally got
off my lazy you-know-what and did a backtrace. Here's the requested info
as per http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html:
* Dovecot version
[root at airframe]:~# dovecot --version
1.0.3
* Operating system or Linux distribution name
Slackware 10.2, both kernel 2.6.21.3 and dovecot self-compiled
* CPU
2019 Nov 24
2
Proxy GSSAPI + PLAIN authentication
Hi,
I try to configure a proxy accepting GSSAPI and PLAIN authentication.
When authenticating with Kerberos, Dovecot uses master user and password to
authenticate to backends (backends can be Cyrus or Exchange servers too)
When authenticating with PLAIN passwords, Dovecot sends user's login and
password to the backend.
For GSSAPI, I use extrafields :
k5principals=principal at REALM proxy=Y
2019 Nov 24
0
Proxy GSSAPI + PLAIN authentication
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
If your dovecot is recent enough you can use mechanisms setting on passdb block. See https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/password_databases_passdb/
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
2012 Mar 05
1
[PATCH] GSSAPI authorization and virtual users
The attached patch makes it possible for Kerberos principals to be
associated with a password database entry by adding a new "k5principals"
passdb setting. A client that successfully authenticates using GSSAPI
will be able to log in as any user who has been associated with the
client's Kerberos principal. This means that users can now use their
Kerberos identities to access virtual
2020 Aug 12
0
auth debug log entry incorrect
Hello,
just want to report a slightly confusing log entry on auth-debug level I have encountered while setting up Kerberos auth.
Users are stored in ldap, Kerberos makes use of the same ldap as its backend, goal was to enable users to use their principals in addition to simple login with mailAddress/userPassword combination.
Sample entry relevant attrs:
---
mailAddress: sn.gn at example.com
2016 Jul 04
2
Configure Dovecot for GSSAPI [formerly: Looking for GSSAPI config]
After a over a year and a half struggling to get Dovecot to do either NTLM or GSSAPI
authentication with Samba4 AD/DC, I believe I've finally got it! Thanks to all those in this
list who helped: Jan Jurkus, Edgar Pettijohn, Gregory Sloop, Tom Talpey especially Aki Tuomi;
and infinite thanks to Achim Gottinger on the SambaList for his patience in working this
through with me. Although my
2006 May 24
1
imap proxy and passwd-like passdb/userdb
Hi,
I'm testing/using dovecot as imap proxy, passdb/userdb as
passwd-like-file. It seems to function as expected (1). This setup is
described in the wiki in AuthSpecials. But I also noticed in the
documentation (ImapProxy / FeatLoginProxy pages) that the proxy feature
only works with a sql passdb. Maybe I did something strange, but
passwd-like-passdb does work.....
So I have some
2013 Oct 02
1
LDAP for passdb and SQL for userdb
Hello
Is it possible to setup double backend ? ldap for auth only and SQL for
userdb information(quota,maildir etc) ?
Now I'm using SQL backend and configuration looks like this:
passdb {
driver = sql
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf
}
userdb {
driver = prefetch
}
userdb {
driver = sql
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf
}
Can I do something like:
passdb {
driver = sql
args
2007 Jul 02
1
passdb/userdb restart
Hello Timo,
I've noticed that when slapd which I'm using as the passdb and the prefetched
userdb is restarted I have to restart dovecot. As a matter of fact, if I don't,
I get the following error :
--
Jul 2 16:38:39 xxxx dovecot: imap-login: Internal login failure: user=<xxxx>, method=PLAIN, rip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, lip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, TLS
Jul 2 16:38:46 xxxx dovecot:
2009 Mar 13
0
using passwd userdb with sql passdb
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 16:18 -0700, Shane W wrote:
> The problem may be the shane@ bit. If I delete the sql
> entry, the lookup just shows 'shane'. I'm not loging in
> with @ but my query does use the username,domain syntax for
> instances of virtual users which don't use passwd userdb:
> select username,domain,password from users
> WHERE username = '%n'
2011 Jul 07
0
passdb/userdb via UNIX socket?
Hi,
I've been running some performance tests - especially delivery (LDA and
LMTP) and it seems there's room for improvement.
At least it would be nice to get rid of the fork() and pipe to deliver
LDA and the fork of the checkpasswd script for userdb lookup.
I've tried LMTP to not fork deliver (*), but checkpasswd still takes
time (ok, maybe because it's written on perl as of
2013 Feb 28
1
Mongo backend for userdb and passdb
Hi,
I was wondering if any work had been made (out of tree) or has been
planned for a mongo driver? If not is it something that would be of
any interest for being included?
Regards,
Damien
2013 Oct 18
2
proxy, userdb and passdb
Dear all,
We are getting closer to the migration of our mailsystem. Now I have a
special question. We are successfully using
passdb {
driver = pam
}
and that is good. Now, how would I tell dovecot to proxy certain users
(the ones not yet migrated) to the old server? My attempts to configure
an additional userdb failed since this seems to override the passdb setting.
Grateful for any
2014 Jun 05
0
SQL passdb, LDAP userdb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 27 May 2014, Kristof Bajnok wrote:
> in my current setup, LDAP authentication + userdb works fine.
>
> I'd like to integrate Dovecot with Shibboleth. I have a custom module at
> the IdP (*) that inserts short-time tokens to an SQL table at user
> authentication, and I want Dovecot to use the token table for passdb but
>
2015 Feb 17
2
multiple ldap userdb and passdb
hi everybody.
I wonder if such a scenario is possible.
if yes would I configure multiple passdb using ldap driver
or within one clause set up multiple args? How would this work?
many thanks
P.
2015 Feb 17
0
multiple ldap userdb and passdb
On 02/17/2015 04:03 PM, lejeczek wrote:
> hi everybody.
>
> I wonder if such a scenario is possible.
> if yes would I configure multiple passdb using ldap driver
> or within one clause set up multiple args? How would this work?
Did you read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/MultipleDatabases?
Regards,
Pascal
--
The trapper recommends today: face1e55.1504802 at
2015 Feb 18
0
multiple ldap userdb and passdb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, lejeczek wrote:
> On 17/02/15 19:36, Pascal Volk wrote:
>> On 02/17/2015 04:03 PM, lejeczek wrote:
>>> hi everybody.
>>>
>>> I wonder if such a scenario is possible.
>>> if yes would I configure multiple passdb using ldap driver
>>> or within one clause set up multiple args?
2015 Apr 10
0
Disabling of userdb/passdb modules using config statements
On 04/10/2015 05:59 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
> This can be resolved by commenting out the entries in
> auth-system.conf.ext but then I'll have to do that again at package
> upgrade time.
Comment out the !include auth-system.conf.ext line in 10-auth.conf.
>
> Hence, would it be a cool option to be able (in the 99-myconfig.conf)
> file to put:
Actually you mean
2015 Apr 10
0
Disabling of userdb/passdb modules using config statements
On Sex, 10 Abr 2015, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Though indeed simpler than commenting out multiple lines, that file also
> gets replaced by a package upgrade.
>
> Hence does not solve the 'can just upgrade silently' issue.
If the file is unchanged then, yes, it gets replaced on upgrades. If
it has local changes, however, you'll get a prompt asking what you
want to do (keep