similar to: Dovecot - Upgrade Solr 7.7.2 to 8.4.1

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Dovecot - Upgrade Solr 7.7.2 to 8.4.1"

2020 Jan 22
2
Dovecot - Upgrade Solr 7.7.2 to 8.4.1
Hi, thanks for your answer. I confirm, mitigate this issue is very very easy. There are other issues with high severity for example CVE-2019-17558. Description: Apache Solr 5.0.0 to Apache Solr 8.3.1 are vulnerable to a Remote Code Execution through the VelocityResponseWriter I think for this issue there is only a solution, upgrade Solr to 8.4. It's Correct? So, with Dovecot is it possible
2019 Sep 16
2
Dovecot 2.3.7.2 lucene segfault and coredump
Hi, I have other information. I analyzed the core dump: (gdb) core 22534 [New LWP 22534] Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server.debug...done. done. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by
2019 Sep 12
2
Dovecot 2.3.7.2 lucene segfault and coredump
Hi, i have a problem with libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4. I See segfault error to messages log, when dovecot store mail to INBOX. set 12 13:41:21 box02.par-tec.it kernel: doveadm-server[20285]: segfault at 38 ip 00007f575b68fc42 sp 00007ffc0272e750 error 4 in libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4[7f575b569000+188000] set 12 13:41:22 box02.par-tec.it kernel: doveadm-server[18871]: segfault at 38 ip
2019 Sep 16
1
Dovecot 2.3.7.2 lucene segfault and coredump
Hi Stephan, thanks for your replay. This is bt full output: (gdb) bt full #0 clear (this=0x0) at /usr/src/debug/clucene-core-2.3.3.4/src/core/CLucene/util/VoidMap.h:123 No locals. #1 lucene::search::FieldSortedHitQueue::_shutdown () at /usr/src/debug/clucene-core-2.3.3.4/src/core/CLucene/search/FieldSortedHitQueue.cpp:60 No locals. #2 0x00007f7dc5eabe96 in _lucene_shutdown () at
2020 Jan 22
0
Dovecot - Upgrade Solr 7.7.2 to 8.4.1
On 2020-01-22 8:42 am, Domenico Pastore wrote: > Hello, > I have Dovecot configured with Solr for the indexes. > > I have need your support for upgrade solr 7.7.2 to 8.4.1. > Solr 7.7.2 has a security issue CVE-2019-12409. > > It's possible upgrade of Solr? > Dovecot work correctly with Solr 8.x? > > The Solr documentation recommended after updating: >
2014 Jun 21
2
Managing users and home dirs
For those of you using virtual users, and SQL, how are you managing your users and their home dirs ? That is, what process do you use for adding/deleting users, creating their home dirs etc ? I suppose it's easy enough to do manually, inserting rows in the database, creating dirs, chown/chmod yada yada, but there must be a better way to do it ... If you're doing dovecot replication then it
2020 Feb 05
1
Dovecot - Upgrade Solr 7.7.2 to 8.4.1
On 1/23/20 7:03 AM, Domenico Pastore wrote: >> So, with Dovecot is it possible to use Apache Solr 8.4? >> High RAM usage is the only problem? > I'm using 8.4.0 and it works flawlessly. I want to install fts-solr, but must tutorials are mentioning solr 7.7.0. Any heads-up on what one must pay attention to when installing 8.4.0? Do I need to update the version on the schemas,
2004 Aug 09
5
Bizarre failure of samba shares to XP
OK, this one is really strange, and I'm not sure where to go with it. Here's the setup ... Main box is running Debian testing/sarge with samba 3.0.5. Earlier it was 3.0.4 and 3.0.2. Very generic installation for home, acting as a file server for several XP Pro boxes, and everything has been running swimmingly. Using USER security, with users logging in to the XP boxes with the same ID
2020 May 30
1
Current thinking on backups ?
I run a pair of dovecot servers for personal small domains with several layers of backup in place ... - The two dovecot servers replicate to each via a Tinc vpn mesh. That gives email resiliency. - All mail is replicated via offlineimap to a 3rd server over that Tinc vpn. It's on the mesh, it has space, so why not ? - All mail is replicated as well as via mbsync to a zfs dataset on my
2014 Jun 03
2
Replication with virtual users and static userdb possible ?
Is it possible to get replication working in a virtual user setup that uses a static userdb ? My environment is fairly simple and typical - there's a single system user (vmail) that owns all the home dirs (/var/mail/domain.com/user). The virtual users (userid at domain.com:secretpassword) are kept in a single file (/var/mail/domain.com/PASSWD) that's unique per domain, and referenced as a
2019 Aug 30
2
Dovecot 2.3.7 - char "-" missing
Hello, i have update dovecot from version 2.2.15 to 2.3.7.2. I have a problem with mine java software because there is a different response when open connection to doveadm. I need open socket to doveadm for get imap quota of a mailbox. With version 2.2.15: # telnet 192.160.10.4 924 Trying 192.160.10.4... Connected to 192.160.10.4. Escape character is '^]'. - With version 2.3.7.2: #
2020 May 24
3
Current thinking on backups ?
Hi, What are people doing for backups ? My current process is LVM snapshot and backup from that to NFS share. But there seems to be hints around the internet that people use/abuse "doveadm backup" for backup purposes even though it seems its original intention was for transferring mailboxes between dovecot instances. Assuming its ok to "doveadm backup" to an NFS share, is it
2013 Dec 10
4
OT: Large corporate email systems - Exchange vs open source *nix based
Hello, There has been some whispers about considering migrating our mail systems to Exchange Server. I want to try to nip this in the bud. I would like to ask for some help with providing some kind of comparison of large(r) commercial companies use of email systems... specifically, those using Microsoft Exchange Server, vs those using open source Linux/Unix based systems, including even
2008 Nov 20
2
[LLVMdev] Patch to VMKIT tools makefile
Hello, Here's a tiny patch to the VMKIT tools makefile, that allows you to build VMKIT without both Java and CLI. I'm working on a new bytecode front end so wanted a 'clean' mvm without building to two existing front ends. Currently it still tries to build VMJC even when its told not to build the JNJVM. This patch fixes that. Index: tools/Makefile
2017 Dec 27
12
Package repository now available
Dovecot now has package repository for Debian, CentOS and Ubuntu available at https://repo.dovecot.org/ Packages are provided for 2.3 series and forward. Please let us know if you run into any trouble with these. --- Aki Tuomi Dovecot oy
2017 Dec 27
12
Package repository now available
Dovecot now has package repository for Debian, CentOS and Ubuntu available at https://repo.dovecot.org/ Packages are provided for 2.3 series and forward. Please let us know if you run into any trouble with these. --- Aki Tuomi Dovecot oy
2008 Nov 20
0
[LLVMdev] Patch to VMKIT tools makefile
Hi Dean, Applies thanks! Out of curiosity, which part of mvm are you using? I guess the GC? Nicolas Dean Calver wrote: > Hello, > > Here's a tiny patch to the VMKIT tools makefile, that allows you to > build VMKIT without both Java and CLI. I'm working on a new bytecode > front end so wanted a 'clean' mvm without building to two existing > front ends.
2005 Apr 20
4
results from sammon()
Dear all, I'm trying to get a two dimensional embedding of some data using different meythods, among which princomp(), cmds(), sammon() and isoMDS(). I have a problem with sammon() because the coordinates I get are all equal to NA. What does it mean? Why the method fails in finding the coordinates? Can I do anything to get some meaningful results? Thank you very much Domenico
2019 Sep 16
0
Dovecot 2.3.7.2 lucene segfault and coredump
Op 16-9-2019 om 11:53 schreef Domenico Pastore via dovecot: > > Hi, > > I have other information. > > I analyzed the core dump: > > (gdb) core 22534 > [New LWP 22534] > Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server...Reading > symbols from > /usr/lib/debug/usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server.debug...done. > done. > [Thread debugging using
2006 Oct 27
3
[OT] wi-fi ip phone scenario
Hello everyone. I know it's a little bit off-topic, but I was just wondering... Has anyone ever had any experience with asterisk, a wi-fi meshed lan (with more than one access point) and wi-fi sip phones? I made some tests but I'm not really satisfied.... Wi-fi phones are a curse (as far as I know even Nokia eSeries -I personally own an e70 model- have their flaws): - random sip