similar to: When is a new mail not unseen?

> On 23 Dec 2019, at 11.57, Philip Colmer <philip.colmer at linaro.org> wrote: > > I'm trying to diagnose a really strange situation where certain emails, when submitted to the mailbox by Postfix, are not considered to be unseen by Dovecot. > > During testing, I've shut down anything else on the server that might want to access the mailbox. I submit the email to the

On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 at 08:04, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > On 23/12/2019 22:17 Michael < ml at hemathor.de> wrote: > > > On Monday, December 23, 2019 11:22:27 AM CET, Sami Ketola wrote: > > change your configuration to use some more optimized mailbox > format and configure postfix to deliver over dovecot-lda or > lmtp. > > or,

We're using dovecot on a help desk ticketing system. The system doesn't perform any cleanup of IMAP mailboxes so we have a regular cronjob doing this: /usr/bin/doveadm flags add -A '\Deleted' SEEN SENTBEFORE 12w && /usr/bin/doveadm expunge -A DELETED MAILBOX '*' Recently, doveadm has been reporting this: doveadm(nobody): Error: User initialization failed:

dovecot 2.2.33.2 (d6601f4ec) on Ubuntu 18.04 The recent announcement that expunge is going to be deprecated and that autoexpunge should be used instead reminded me that my recent switch over to autoexpunge is not working. There has been an active discussion today about getting expunge working so I thought I'd use the commands suggested there to figure out why autoexpunge might not be doing

> On 2 Oct 2019, at 17.01, John Stoffel <john at stoffel.org <mailto:john at stoffel.org>> wrote: > To look at all the mailboxes on the server and see how many RECENT > mails there are. For the postfix-users list, I see that there are 6 > recent messages. And if I do the list of mailboxes command again, it > returns the same count. Then if I go and look at the

Hi all, I've been bugged by this issue for a while, and while I see that the \UNSEEN flag is specified in the RFC to be reset once *any* client connects and looks at a mailbox, I was wondering if there's a way to change the behavior so that it's tracked on a per-client basis? Or if there's even some way to turn it off so that both my iPhone mail client and my main emacs viewmail

On Monday, December 23, 2019 11:22:27 AM CET, Sami Ketola wrote: > change your configuration to use some more optimized mailbox > format and configure postfix to deliver over dovecot-lda or > lmtp. or, since you already use doveadm, tell dovecot to index your mailbox manually before your 'doveadm status' command: doveadm -v index -q -u local-it-support INBOX greetings...

>>>>> "Sami" == Sami Ketola via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> writes: >> On 1 Oct 2019, at 21.45, John Stoffel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've been bugged by this issue for a while, and while I see that the >> \UNSEEN flag is specified in the RFC to be reset once *any*

On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 at 09:28, Philip Colmer <philip.colmer at linaro.org> wrote: > > I'm working on switching over to getting Postfix to deliver via lmtp but > the above seems to me to be a good manual workflow to emulate what should > be happening and it concerns me that Dovecot still says there are no unseen > messages ... > > Philip > > I've completed

On 8 Aug 2019, at 13:03, Amir Caspi <cepheid at 3phase.com> wrote: > IMHO the setting should apply regardless of protocol, but is that actually the case in practice? It seems to be broken. I have namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { autoexpunge = 14 days auto = subscribe special_use = \Junk } ? } and I have messages in my

Thank you, Sami. I've made that change. Regards Philip On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 10:50, Sami Ketola <Sami.Ketola at open-xchange.com> wrote: > Hi, > > how about switching to use autoexpunge? > > https://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxSettings > > Sami > > > On 17 Feb 2020, at 11.01, Philip Colmer <philip.colmer at linaro.org> wrote: > > We're

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:08:00 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > How do you deliver then mails to the server? > > also mbox is very unoptimised mailbox format for this. Each time mail is deleted from mbox mailbox the whole mbox while needs to be rewritten to remove the mail. OpenSMTPD and Dovecot run on the same machine. OpenSMTPD receives incoming mails and

On 03/07/2023 14:11, ???? ?????? wrote: > If you insist that it is the expected output, then we have a bug in > all linux distributions. All of them! > For example this is latest fedora: > [kasak at kasakoff ~]$ smbclient -N -L localhost > > Sharename Type Comment > --------- ---- ------- > print$ Disk Printer Drivers > share

If you insist that it is the expected output, then we have a bug in all linux distributions. All of them! For example this is latest fedora: [kasak at kasakoff ~]$ smbclient -N -L localhost Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- print$ Disk Printer Drivers share Disk IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba 4.18.3) SMB1 disabled -- no

Hi list, this question is related to the IMAP protocol itself, not really to Dovecot. I'm trying to understand what is the more efficient way to maintain the number of unseen messages of the currently selected mailbox. RFC3501 says a client must not issue a STATUS command to the selected mailbox and that information sent by a SELECT is enough. My current idea follows these steps : * Issue a

Hi, I've a virtual folder that contains unseen messages. When I mark the message and expunge the folder, the message should disappear. This works as expected in alpine. Alpine uses the following commands: 06000010 STORE 1 +Flags (\SEEN) 06000020 EXPUNGE Using roundcube mail, the message wont disappear, when I perform the same steps. RoundCube Mails sends: flg UID STORE 445 +FLAGS

>>>>> "John" == John Stoffel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> writes: >>>>> "Sami" == Sami Ketola via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> writes: >>> On 1 Oct 2019, at 21.45, John Stoffel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've been

> On 1 Oct 2019, at 21.45, John Stoffel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I've been bugged by this issue for a while, and while I see that the > \UNSEEN flag is specified in the RFC to be reset once *any* client > connects and looks at a mailbox, I was wondering if there's a way to > change the behavior so that it's

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> <br> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 23/12/2019 22:17 Michael < <a href="mailto:ml@hemathor.de">ml@hemathor.de</a>> wrote: </div> <div> <br>

On 03/07/2023 13:01, ???? ?????? via samba wrote: > hello everyone! > > I'm using samba on OpenBSD and there is unusual behavior in it! > > The problem is [homes] share, it erroneously map nobody as a home share > for guest user. > > I noticed this with upgrading from 4.15 to 4.17. > > Please have a look at this simple config: > > --- > >