similar to: Doveadm HTTP API and CORS

I?d like to migrate to a new server. I only need to transfer the mail store, have already done the users. I?ve seen different recommendations: IMAP-Sync Rsync Doveadmin backup and dsync What are the pros and cons of each? What would be best for me? I?m thinking that Doveadmin backup is the way to go. Both old and new servers are on same network. New server is running Dovecot 2.3.2.1, old server

Thanks Sam Users not using new mail server yet. Both old and new using maildir. Sounds like rsync is the way to go. Thanks for your help. James. Sent from my iPhone XI > On 4 Sep 2018, at 5:41 pm, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > >> On 4 Sep 2018, at 10.20, James Brown <jlbrown at bordo.com.au> wrote: >> >> I?d like to

Hi I have two server directors in ring and 5 dovecot servers (2.2.36) IP for IMAP and POP3 is a VIP (keepalived) What is the best solutions to get realy HA for 5 dovecot servers ? Maby corosync+pacemeker ? But this solution is too problematic and hardcore Why I need HA ? Doveadmin is too lazy and doveadm director does not know that one machine broke down and still sends traffic

Hi, I'm trying to use doveadm backup but I'm having a few issues. When trying locally: `doveadm backup -D -A maildir:/usr/local/backup` It results that no mailbox is separated by user - all seems to sync on the same folder, messing up with the folder structure of the original maildir. When trying remotely: `doveadm backup -D -A -N ssh -i mykey root at myremotebackup.com:/backup

I have successfully set up the master user on the destination server (2.0.11) and tests have worked. now I'm working on the proxy Before I had the proxy just forward everything to the backend and had the destination server do the authentication. My authentication is done via LDAP but not really sure how to append the master user and password to the users credentials after authentication is

> On 4 Sep 2018, at 10.20, James Brown <jlbrown at bordo.com.au> wrote: > > I?d like to migrate to a new server. I only need to transfer the mail store, have already done the users. I?ve seen different recommendations: > > IMAP-Sync > Rsync > Doveadmin backup and > dsync > > What are the pros and cons of each? What would be best for me? I?m thinking that

If you have lots of data, you can make an initial pass with rsync whilst the old server is running and another rsync pass (with --delete, use dry run to test) when you've shut down the old server to sync the changes since the initial pass. Good luck! Reio On 04/09/2018 11:40, James Brown wrote: > Thanks Sam > > Users not using new mail server yet. > > Both old and new

Hi, I'm trying to set Weakforced with Dovecot and I cannot log in policy server. This is the config: /root/weakforced/wforce/wforce.conf ----------------------------------- ... webserver("0.0.0.0:8084", "super") ... /etc/dovecot/conf.d/95-policy.conf ---------------------------------- auth_policy_server_url = http://localhost:8084/ #auth_policy_hash_nonce = wforce:super

Hi Aki, I've configured in this way: vm-weakforced:~# printf 'wforce:super' | base64 d2ZvcmNlOnN1cGVy vm-weakforced:~# cat /etc/dovecot/conf.d/95-policy.conf auth_policy_server_url = http://localhost:8084/ auth_policy_hash_nonce = some random string auth_policy_server_api_header = "Authorization: Basic d2ZvcmNlOnN1cGVy With the same result... > WforceWebserver: HTTP

I took suggestions from https://forge.puppet.com/fraenki/wforce to set these in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/95-auth.conf auth_policy_server_url = http://localhost:8084/ auth_policy_hash_nonce = our_password auth_policy_server_api_header = "Authorization: Basic hash_from_running_echo-n_base64" auth_policy_server_timeout_msecs = 2000 auth_policy_hash_mech = sha256 auth_policy_request_attributes =

I use Dovecot simply as a way, to provide an e-mail archive for people on the LAN, where they can move messages into from within thunderbird. Mails are stored in a maildir of one system user where all the people know the password of. This was very easy to setup in ubuntu 12. Today I started using the mail_log plugin to provide an audit trail. Now I am looking for a light way, to get the log

On 28.3.2019 22.34, Robert Kudyba via dovecot wrote: >>>>> Set >>>>> >>>>> ssl_client_ca_file=/path/to/cacert.pem to validate the certificate? >>>> >>>> Can this be the Lets Encrypt cert that we already have? In other >>>> words we have: >>>> ssl_cert = </etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem

Trying to limit the API calls to doveadm-http-api by configure allowed commands, but once the commands added to the list, the RestAPI no longer work. 1) Return correct reply when doveadm_allowed_commands is empty # curl -k -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Authorization: X-Dovecot-API <base64 api key>" https://localhost:9088/doveadm/v1

So for auth_policy_server_api_header. is the value of our_password come from the hashed response or the plain-text password? What else am I doing wrong? Mar 7 09:20:53 olddsm wforce[17763]: WforceWebserver: HTTP Request "/" from 127.0.0.1:56416: Web Authentication failed curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" --data '{"login?:?ouruser?, "remote":

> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:29 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > >> On 28 March 2019 16:08 Robert Kudyba via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> >> dovecot-2.3.3-1.fc29.x86_64 >> >> Mar 28 10:04:47 auth: Panic: file http-client-request.c: line 283 (http_client_request_unref): assertion failed:

This is really an apache question but if anyone knows offhand it would be nice to know... How do i build a standalone mod_proxy.so module that i can use to load into an apache install that has loadable module support compiled in? thanks

Hi All, I'm trying to get rsync to proxy through an apache httpd server to an rsync server. On the proxy, which has a direct connection to the internet, I've stopped the firewall and unset HTTP_PROXY and RSYNC_PROXY. I've configured the httpd to allow proxy requests as follows: <IfModule mod_proxy.c># ProxyRequests On <Proxy *> Order deny,allow Deny from all

dbox format needs at least two tools: 1. Expunging only marks the message having refcount=0. The actual disk space is freed only after calling a tool pointing to the user's dbox dir. 2. Ability to force index resync/rebuild in case it doesn't figure out itself that there's something wrong. I'm starting to think about building a more generic mailutil tool, maybe something similar

> ---------- Marvin wrote --------- > From: Marvin Scholz <epirat07 at gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 22:51 > > On 13 Feb 2020, at 23:44, Chip wrote: > > > > This is successful: > > > > curl http://example.com:8000/status-json.xsl > > > > But this: > > > > curl -I http://example.com:8000/status-json.xsl > > >

Good morning On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 14:30, Philipp Schafft <lion at lion.leolix.org> wrote: > > No, official Icecast does not support HEAD requests as they are largely > useless in Icecast context. > > HEAD requests are meant for cache validation. So they only apply to > static files basically. For Icecast, beside a few boring files in web/ > the answer to "is my