similar to: lmtp delivery auth error, but successful delivery

It is a test environment, so I do not have much data. I am testing with 'mail wegjd' seems to deliver ok every time. -----Original Message----- Subject: RE: lmtp delivery auth error, but successful delivery Can you let me know if you get lots of delivery failures? Aki -------- Original message -------- From: Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> Date: 11/12/2019 22.16

If I have sendmail configured to deliver to dovecot lmpt and use the director are incoming messages directed to the correct/configured server? Sendmail.mc with: FEATURE(`local_lmtp',`[IPC]',`FILE /var/run/dovecot/lmtp')dnl

When changing in a working setup sendmail.mc From this MAILER(smtp)dnl MAILER(procmail)dnl To this FEATURE(`local_lmtp',`[IPC]',`FILE /var/run/dovecot/lmtp')dnl MAILER(local)dnl I am getting these errors '501 5.6.0 Data format error' and ' Unrecognized host name'. What should I change in my lmtp config? Could this be related that messages are being relayed from

On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Marc Roos wrote: > When changing in a working setup sendmail.mc > > From this > MAILER(smtp)dnl > MAILER(procmail)dnl > > To this > FEATURE(`local_lmtp',`[IPC]',`FILE /var/run/dovecot/lmtp')dnl > MAILER(local)dnl > > I am getting these errors '501 5.6.0 Data format error' and ' > Unrecognized host name'. > ...

Eg. When I send email from gmail it looks like this (reason: 553 5.1.2 <xxxx at gmail.com>... Unrecognized host name gmail.com.) -----Original Message----- To: dovecot Subject: sendmail -> lmtp 501 5.6.0 Data format error When changing in a working setup sendmail.mc From this MAILER(smtp)dnl MAILER(procmail)dnl To this FEATURE(`local_lmtp',`[IPC]',`FILE

Hi, I can't seems to find any posting on how to configure sendmail to use dovecot as lmtp. All I see is using it as LDA. I am particularly interested on how to tell sendmail to ask dovecot to deliver the message to the user. In the wiki for lda it says to add the following in the sendmail config: FEATURE(`local_procmail',

Hi * after trying everything I could think of and find on the web, I'm totally stumped ... maybe someone give me some hints on what I'm doing wrong, or where to look ... I have an ancient customer box with sendmail & cyrus imap, with imap using an LDAP database of users (no locally configured users), all of which is working fine. This machine needs to be replaced by a new

Need help with setup/config. Current situation: (dovecot version : 1.1.7) we have system users and virtual users. (with different domains) Virtual users have procmail as LDA Now we want "deliver" to become the LDA I'm confused reading http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sendmail sendmail.mc: divert(-1) divert(0)dnl include(`/usr/share/sendmail-cf/m4/cf.m4')dnl

Use exim instead of sendmail with an LDA or LMTP transport. On 04/07/17 15:41, Garry Glendown wrote: > Hi * > > after trying everything I could think of and find on the web, I'm > totally stumped ... maybe someone give me some hints on what I'm doing > wrong, or where to look ... > > I have an ancient customer box with sendmail & cyrus imap, with imap > using

How to change this line in sendmail.mc, to the tcp port 24 on eg 127.0.0.1? FEATURE(`local_lmtp',`[IPC]',`FILE /var/run/dovecot/lmtp')dnl

I found this[1] thread that describes the same problem with dovecot-LDA, but the solution (add X-Original-To: header) has no effect with LMTP. My sendmail LMTP configuration: FEATURE(`local_lmtp',`[IPC]',`FILE /var/run/dovecot/lmtp') Sendmail's address test indicates that sendmail is providing user+detail to LMTP (see below). Except for this problem, dovecot, LMTP, and sieve

A summary of answers I got to the questiosn I posed. > Is there a reason I should prefer LMTP over LDA for local delivery? Thanks for the responses I received. The benefits reported were more/better information logging, and service isolation. Also, one significant advantage not mentioned for LMTP was that one delivery failure to multiple recipients can be disambiguated; LDA can only return

You recommend I should change this? I have already a new setup where I am using[0]. But the current setup I have now was ok for many many years. [0] FEATURE(`local_lmtp',`[IPC]',`FILE /var/run/dovecot/lmtp')dnl -----Original Message----- Subject: RE: Mail received but not indexed? No, it is still old sendmail to /var/spool/mail/ -----Original Message----- From: Sami Ketola

Hi, Last time, I have got no reply, hope this time is better. OS: Solaris 10 Dovecot version : 1.1.1 file system of /var/mail : NFS from Solaris file system of /home : other NFS server that not support rquotad. Here is my setting that works: ---------------------------- plugin { quota = fs:INBOX:mount=/var/mail quota2 = fs:home:noenforcing:mount=/home/h1 } The above settings works. Dovecot

I'm new to dovecot and sendmail and my server doesn't forward mails to 'dovecot deliver' at all. I was reading http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sendmail and this http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-June/040353.html from the mailling list but I could figure it out myself. I someone could point me into the right direction. I'm confused with the config for LDA. Basically what I

Hi Timo and All, how does Dovecot act when an MTA tries to deliver a multiple recipient message to a LMTP proxied system? Does it uses server affinity table for each recipient? I use lmtp_destination_recipient_limit = 1 setting in postfix to avoid multiple recipient delivery. Is it right? I use lmtp_destination_concurrency_limit = 1 too, but i think that it's useless or, maybe, it can

I have my MTA (Postfix) check Dovecot2 LMTP for existing users. No other delivery is done; this is a virtual/LMTP-only setup. I define known users in a Dovecot passwd-file, specified in conf.d/10-auth.conf passdb { args = ... username_format=%n /stor01/vmail/auth.d/%d/passwd e.g., vi /stor01/vmail/auth.d/mx1.domain1.com/passwd myuser:{scheme}####:... mail to: myuser at mx1.domain1.com

Hi, is there any way, based on userdb/passwdb attribute, how to postpone an email delivery? The purpose is, I need to freeze an account (Maildir++) for a few minutes and new email must not be delivered. But emails must be delivered when account is unfrozen. I found few things about Postfix filters, but I'm not sure it's a good way. Thank you, Milo

* Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> 2015.04.29 22:47: > is there any way, based on userdb/passwdb attribute, how to postpone an > email delivery? The purpose is, I need to freeze an account (Maildir++) for > a few minutes and new email must not be delivered. But emails must be > delivered when account is unfrozen. You can put the messages on hold and then release them

I was under the impression that Dovecot does not look at .forward by default, since of course, Sieve is where that kind of logic should go. However, I'm seeing a .forward file being honoured by the LMTP delivery agent. Is this to be expected?