similar to: About "received" header when using Dovecot proxy

> On 2 Dec 2019, at 19.23, Tom Sommer via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > On 2019-12-02 13:42, Riku via dovecot wrote: >> Hello. >> My name is Riku. >> Currently, I use Dovecot as a proxy for another SMTP server. >> However, this seems to cause the IP address of the "received" header >> to be that of the proxy server.

On 2019-12-02 13:42, Riku via dovecot wrote: > Hello. > My name is Riku. > > Currently, I use Dovecot as a proxy for another SMTP server. > However, this seems to cause the IP address of the "received" header > to be that of the proxy server. > Is it possible to change this so that the IP address of the sender is > entered? > The version of Dovecot is

Hello. Sorry. Since 2.3.9 was released, I installed it immediately and tried to set "lmtp_add_received_header" to "no". But it seems different from what I wanted to do. The following is my configuration file. Please let me know if there are any other configuration files that need to be listed. Is there any way to avoid adding it to the ?received? header? -----

On 4.12.2019 15.33, Riku via dovecot wrote: > Hello. > > Sorry. > Since 2.3.9 was released, I installed it immediately and tried to set "lmtp_add_received_header" to "no". > But it seems different from what I wanted to do. > The following is my configuration file. > Please let me know if there are any other configuration files that need to be listed. >

Hi, I''m having problems with new Shorewall installation on Fedora Core 3 (had same problem with Core 2 and upgrade did not help even iptables was upgraded from 1.2.9 to 1.2.11). I''ve followed two nic example, but starting Shorewall drops all connections and don''t permit any outgoing requests, even with "all allowed" policy. Policy file is below. Current setup

Hi everyone, I use Dovecot in lmtp mode to receive mails. I would like an option to tell Dovecot to not add a "Reveived" header on each server (I use a director, so Director also adds this header). Is it possible to do this ? Or could it be a future feature ? Thank you. Florent

Hello. Thank you for teaching. I'd like to try it out if 2.3.9 comes out. I look forward to the release of 2.3.9. Thank you very much. Best regards.

Hello Aki, I have this problem just with 2.3.8, my self-compiled 2.3.3 works fine. I have previously tried to update from 2.3.3 to higher versions (possibly 2.3.5 or so), but always had this error, which is why I am always back to 2.3.3. Configuration is exactly the same. Here my output from "doveconf -n": # 2.3.8 (9df20d2db): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf# Pigeonhole version 0.5.8

> On 18/10/2019 14:25 Tom Sommer via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > On 2019-10-08 13:18, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.8.tar.gz > > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.8.tar.gz.sig > > Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ > > > - imap: SETMETADATA with literal value

Hi, I have just built a new pair of similar machines both running CentOS 8.2 (selinux disabled) and Dovecot 2.3.8 (9df20d2db). One machine is a VPS (host A) and one is on my home network (host B). The idea is that they are set up in a master/master config with Dovecot replication. I seem to have this 95% working but there is one strange issue I can?t work out. Currently B is a perfect replica

Hi System centos8 + dovecot-2.3.8 from repo # 2.3.8 (9df20d2db): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.8 (b7b03ba2) # OS: Linux 4.18.0-193.19.1.el8_2.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS Linux release 8.2.2004 (Core) ?I need "Antispam plugin". What antispam-plugin I must use ? In older version dovecot-2.2.36.4 i use "dovecot-antispam-plugin" but in centos I had a problem with

Hello, I have 2 Dovecot 2.3.8 servers running SSL with valid wildcard certificates. Email clients connect fine, https://www.immuniweb.com/ssl/ tests show certificates are ok. However I can't make replication work when I add ssl = yes. Without ssl it works ok. I added verbose_ssl in config and error log shows: dovecot: doveadm(149.x.x.x): Error: SSL handshake failed: SSL_accept()

Hello from a neophyte! Is there a diagnostic programme which can be run to determine if there are any faults in Samba 2.2.3a? I cannot connect from Win XP to my rev/b iMac (suddenly, maybe 'upgrade' to 10.3.4 had some effect) and the smb crashlog (shown below) has a pile of stuff which is incomprehensible to me. Secondly, how does one upgrade to another version of Samba and is this

On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:51:32 +0200 maximilian attems <maks at stro.at> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:14:44PM +0530, Anil Singhar wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > We have some patches to port klibc to ArmV8. > > > > The first set of patches from Neil Williams fixes the build issues. > > The second set of patches from Anil Singhar fixes functionalities.

Op 11-9-2020 om 16:05 schreef bobby: > Is this an affected version of the bug? > > 2.3.8 (9df20d2db) > That is pretty old. Chances are that this problem is already solved in a more recent release. Regards, Stephan. > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 12:42 PM Stephan Bosch > <stephan at rename-it.nl <mailto:stephan at rename-it.nl>> wrote: > > >

Hi All Need some brilliants minds here :) I''m using Rails 2.3.8 & ruby 1.8 (I know, I know... ) I''ve move my gems from .gems to Bundler, but I''m having some issues with Factory_girl when I rake spec "uninitialized constant Factory" I''m following the instructions from http://gembundler.com/rails23.html. Basically: - grab all config.gem and place

Good afternoon. Faced an incomprehensible problem in the work of Samba 4.4.5 and Samba 4.6.4 In the config I have the parameters: Directory mask = 0770 Force directory mode = 0770 Create mask = 0770 Force create mode = 0770 On systems starting from Windows XP and above, as well as with MacOS X 10.8 and higher, everything works right. But on MacOS X 10.6 - 10.7 systems, why folders and files are

> From: "Wilfred L. Guerin" <wilfredguerin at gmail.com> > Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM Expansions > > It is very relevant that LLVM look into handeling HDL and other binary > and analogue operation modeling capbilities, as well as expand this what is binary? you mean digital right? > Without confirming the true characteristics of the lower structure > types and

With reference to R News News: R version 3.0.0 (Masked Marvel) has been released on 2013-04-03. R version 2.15.3 (Security Blanket) has been released on 2013-03-01 R version 2.15.2 (Trick or Treat) .... R version 2.15.1 ("Roasted Marshmallows") ... R version 2.15.0 ("Easter Beagle") R version 2.14.0 ("Great Pumpkin") Dear R help List, How are these version types

I added a new data file, NLSY.RData, to a package that uses LazyData: Yes It passed R CRAN check and R CMD install worked w/o significant complaints. * installing to library 'C:/R/R-2.15.2/library' * installing *source* package 'heplots' ... ** R ** data ** moving datasets to lazyload DB ** demo ** inst ** preparing package for lazy loading Warning: package 'nnet' was