similar to: Duplicate e-mail with Dovecot and Sieve

On 21 Sep 2020, at 01:48, Claudio Corvino <ccorvino at trustitalia.it> wrote: > problem still occurring, I just noticed that if I do an "ls -l /mnt/mail-storage/<user>/Maildir/cur/" from the Dovecot server I can unblock the mailbox of the user and Thunderbird can receives all the e-mails. > > The problem occurs even with the gmail client on the smartphone. >

X-Loop header could be what I was looking for, thanks! On 28/11/19 22:03, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > On 28 Nov 2019, at 09:44, Claudio Corvino <ccorvino at trustitalia.it> wrote: >> Just one problem remaining: the e-mail that have LIST at domain.tld in BCC could not be intercepted by the sieve filter as in the header is not present any reference to LIST at domain.tld; am I

Hi, I think that the test "if not duplicate" could not work for our case, as the out of office should answer everytime, we only wants the redirect to not be sent as a duplicate for the users of the alias LIST. In other words we would like: 1) To redirect the e-mail directed to a single user (with out of office active) to LIST at domain.tld, so that every user of the LIST receives

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 7:36 AM Claudio Corvino <ccorvino at trustitalia.it> wrote: > Thanks Jochen, > > no mixups present at all, file assigned to UID 501. > > Since this problem started few hours after the Debian upgrade, I think > it is related to it. > > I don't know if something has changed on the NFS client side on Debian, > but I don't think so as

On 28 Nov 2019, at 09:44, Claudio Corvino <ccorvino at trustitalia.it> wrote: > Just one problem remaining: the e-mail that have LIST at domain.tld in BCC could not be intercepted by the sieve filter as in the header is not present any reference to LIST at domain.tld; am I missing something or this cannot be fixed? The normal way to do this is to add an X-Loop header. And no, there is

Hi, this sound correct, here is my fstab entry: /XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:/mail-storage??? /mnt/mail-storage nfs defaults,timeo=30??? ??? ??? ??? 0?????? 0/ Here are my options when doing "mount":

The "duplicate" test was removed because not working in this particular case, I already read the RFC but I didn't find anything useful for our case. I'll try replacing `if true` with `if not duplicate` into sieve script and I'll post back the result. The "true" check is used to enable the out of office rule, otherwise we use "if false # true" to

Hi Claudio Corvino via dovecot, We have received your request and a ticket has been created with Ticket ID - 22073. A support representative will be reviewing your request and will contact you shortly. To view the status of the ticket or add comments, please visit? https://support.atomia.com/helpdesk/tickets/22073 Speak to you soon, Atomia Support Team

Hi everyone, after some hours when I sent my last e-mail to the ML the problem reoccurred, again problem with some mailboxes reading some e-mails and many errors into dovecot.log like these: /Jul 14 15:07:50 imap(XXX): Error: open(/mnt/mail-storage/XXX/Maildir/cur/1594641298.M607225P10899.XXX,S=4465,W=4534:2,m) failed: Permission denied (euid=501(vmail) egid=501(vmail) missing +r perm:

Thanks Jochen, no mixups present at all, file assigned to UID 501. Since this problem started few hours after the Debian upgrade, I think it is related to it. I don't know if something has changed on the NFS client side on Debian, but I don't think so as aptlistchanges didn't notify me about it, nor if Dovecot 2.2.17 treat NFS in other way. I'm stuck. On 13/07/20 16:07,

Can a mail admin ban atomia.com from posting? I mean, I like the idea that every post is clogging up their support queue, but really, not that much. Sent from my iPhone

Hi, My situation is as follows. -An internet-facing spam filter relays email to destination mail server (Dovecot) with SMTP. - Dovecot should take email and deliver it to user's mailboxes. I guess I'd need LMTP for this. - An external SMTP relay is already in place. I am thinking of using Dovecot submission to relay to the external relaying cluster. So, both relaying and routing are done

Hi, I was unclear in my question. The spam filter is only able to deliver mail over SMTP, not over LMTP.. So I would still need some kind of daemon that listens for SMTP and then offers incoming email to Dovecot's LMTP socket. Met vriendelijke groeten, William Edwards T. 040 - 711 44 96 E. wedwards at cyberfusion.nl ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Roos (M.Roos at

Hola!! Estoy intentando evaluar mi modelo de series temporales (uso auto.arima). Para ello he implemetado el método "rolling window" que se basa en ir añadiendo progresivamente datos al conjunto de train para testar el modelo. Por ejemplo: - Train: 1 año, test: día 1 (24 observaciones, una por hora) --> evalúo ese día (RMSE por ejemplo) - Train: 1 año + 1 día, test: día 2 -->

> Corvino via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > # rule:[Outofoffice] > if true Is this true check used to toggle the vacation responder by commenting/uncommenting the line above?

Hola: Me suena algo de que el año pasado alguien dijo algo sobre unas sugerencias de reglas de estilo para escribir código en R. No he oído nada más en esta lista (a lo mejor se me ha pasado por alto) Ayer se publicó un mensaje sobre esto precisamente en un blog en inglés: http://pairach.com/2012/06/06/r-style-guide/ (copiado debajo para facilitar la lectura y comentarios en esta lista)

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> writes: Mark> This is just me throwing things out to look at, but did the Mark> client mount on the old server use NFS3 and the new upgraded Mark> client uses NFS4? Sometimes that can cause weirdness with id Mark> mapping.? Another thing to check is selinux, is it enabled? It's one of those

Atomia via dovecot skrev den 2019-12-11 17:37: > Hi Claudio Corvino via dovecot, wonderfull example on why mailman sooks on change sender from :// this mail here should imho be very private not posted to maillists stop breaking dkim please

Hello list I' ve a question regarding Samba Documentation I could not figure out how Winbind chace time works I know thsi parameter is user to configure a period of time in which the samba server "retain" user credential to speed up access... What I need to know is WHEN this time starts and is renewed the countdown is restarted every time the user authenticates ? or is a

Hello list I've a problem giving exclusive access to home directory to the user owning it via Samba 3.0.24 I've setup access and user authentication and setup the share as follow [Home] path = /home # valid users = %S valid users = "@DMSWARE\domain users" Each home directory is owned by the AD user Drwx------ 4 gianlucaculot domain users 512