similar to: Vacation Fcc

Hi Stephan, Thanks for your answer! > >> I use Dovecot's Pigeonhole Sieve implementation, and there is one >> little feature I'm missing:? When a vacation message is sent, I'd like >> to keep a copy of that message in my "sent" mailbox. >> >> There is an RFC draft (draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-09) for this, which >> adds a

On 11/10/2019 10:24, Gregory Heytings via dovecot wrote: > > Hi list, > > I use Dovecot's Pigeonhole Sieve implementation, and there is one > little feature I'm missing:? When a vacation message is sent, I'd like > to keep a copy of that message in my "sent" mailbox. > > There is an RFC draft (draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-09) for this, which > adds

Hello everyone, We have Dovecot 2.1.6 and Pigeonhole 0.3.0. We would like Pigeonhole not to send the vacation response to noreply at whatever.com<mailto:noreply at whatever.com>. In this wiki http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Usage#Vacation_auto-reply are showed the different exceptions, but the noreply is not in there. How can I add this address, or another one, to this exception

I don't understand why so many government sites fail to provide some sort of feed to their daily bulletins. What I am venting about in specific are the Canadian CRTC and FCC sites, every day I have to go to the website and when I reach the content, usually it isn't even HTML but a Word or PDF file. So finally today I decided to do something about it and wrote a little app that scrapes

FROM:mailman-bounces at dovecot.org DATE:27. hein?kuuta 2012 16.58.35 UTC+3.00 TO:dovecot-owner at dovecot.org SUBJECT:CONTENT FILTERED MESSAGE NOTIFICATION The attached message matched the dovecot mailing list's content filtering rules and was prevented from being forwarded on to the list membership. ?You are receiving the only remaining copy of the discarded message. FROM:Asier Cidon

Hi, looks like Dovecot-Sieve doesn't know the seconds-extension for vacation: main script: line 5: error: unknown tagged argument ':seconds' for the vacation command (reported only once at first occurence). main script: error: validation failed. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6131 Could this be added during the next releases? Regards, Peer -- Treffen Sie uns auf den

Hi, I have recently updated from Dovecot 2.2 to 2.3. Since I have noticed that vacation responses from sieve are not working the same anymore. For example, my sieve script looks like this: vacation :days 1 :addresses ["Kippels at hhu.de","julian.kippels at hhu.de"] it used to be that I got a vacation response if I sent a mail to kippels at hhu.de and Kippels at hhu.de. Now

I'm using Dovecot's sieve extensions quite happily, they are very good! Thanks for all who worked on them. I have a question that maybe is appropriate for a sieve-specific discussion list, so if there is one I should post to instead, please let me know: I've poked through the sieve vacation RFC and all the documentation I can find and I cannot figure out how to do this. It's

Hi all I'm using Dovecot 2.2.9 and I'm having problems configuring multiple vacation actions. The problem is that I'd like to have two different senders and two different messages, selecting the correct case by the recipient email address. I mean, if someone writes me to my email address "to-address1 at example.com" I'd like to answer from "from-address1 at

I just got back from Boston where we completed testing of the TE410P for FCC, Euro, and Australian approvals, and I'm happy to say we passed all our approvals (including Q.921 and Q.931 layers, i.e. libpri as well as surges) for both telco and leased line applications. Hopefully we'll have the official documents soon, but I know there are a lot of you out there that are happy to hear

http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/04/2212251&tid=158&tid=95&tid=103 Probably some of you already saw this. Now, beyond discussions regarding the legitimacy of such a ruling (whether they have the legal, moral or whatever right to enforce it), there's the technical aspect. Suppose i provide VoIP services using Asterisk, and i fall under the incidence of the FCC ruling

May I ask to add Return-Path: some meaningful header line to sieve sent mail headers in vacation message? Now the header line isn't generated at all and the effect is as follows: on receiving MTA: 2014-05-09T15:04:32+02:00 host/ip postfix/qmgr[2408]: 41F2F6024E: from=<>, size=900, nrcpt=1 (queue active) in received mail body: Return-Path: <> Would be nice to get: Return-Path:

I see the .dovecot.lda-dupes file that is created, but it doesn't seem like just plain text, and it doesn't seem to include strings of the senders, just the recipient. But I know the vacation functionality is clever enough to keep track of who it's already autoreplied to. On a related note, I'm curious about other smarts built in to sieve's vacation responder -- what other

I am using this simple sieve script to do "vacation": require ["fileinto", "vacation"]; if exists "X-Spam-Flag" { stop; } vacation :days 1 :subject "Out of office reply" :addresses ["<email address hidden>", "<email address hidden>" ] "I am on vacation until 2008-08-07. If you have something urgent,

Hello, still trying to move from procmail to sieve, but there are new problems. Currently we use procmail for autoresponder and let user choose timerange, in which responder should work. May be you set up today your responder for 2 weeks in future where responder start and stop automatically without further manuell intervention. In procmail this is done by simple scripting and comparison of

Hi, it seams I have a problem with the vacation script. The problem is that the vacation answers to a address that is not listed in the sieve script. I checked the postfix master.conf which delivers to lda correct parameter. In the logfile you can see that that office at example.com received a message that get delivered to user at example.com (with the sievescipt) and to office at

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:46:21 +0200, Stephan Bosch stated: >Op 21-6-2017 om 19:16 schreef lejeczek: >> hi fellas >> >> generic construct for(if possible): reply vacation message if >> address is not from add1 at com1 add2 at com2 >> >> would you share? > >require "vacation"; > >if not address "from" ["add1 at com1",

I thought I'd asked this question a few years ago but can't seem to find any eveidence of that so here goes. I've been looking at the sieve docs and recipes, done a lot of googling but no joy so far. Using stanard vacation script and that works great, however I want to exclude certain sender email addressess from ever receiving a vacation autoresponse, how do I go about adding that

I am looking at porting and generalizing an old in-house patch that I'm using for the CMU Sieve plugin. It allows sieve script to test & lookup arguments from LDAP. Before getting too involved in this, I'd like to discuss my goals here in the hopes that someone else also thinks this would be useful. Many heads may make better design? Goal: ------ Allows scripts which are still

We have a setup where a Postfix gateway does virtual_alias rewriting of the envelope sender: ralf.hildebrandt at charite.de get rewritten to hildeb at postamt.charite.de The mail is then sent on to postamt.charite.de, the Mailbox server. There we use deliver & doecot. The sieve vacation recipient says it won't answer if: "The envelope recipient is not found in the message To:, Cc: