Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Panic: file smtp-client-connection.c: line 1212 (smtp_client_connection_established): assertion failed: (!conn->connect_succeeded)"
2019 Oct 14
0
Panic: file smtp-client-connection.c: line 1212 (smtp_client_connection_established): assertion failed: (!conn->connect_succeeded)
On 11/10/2019 10:06, Hativ via dovecot wrote:
> Hello Aki,
>
> I have this problem just with 2.3.8, my self-compiled 2.3.3 works
> fine. I have previously tried to update from 2.3.3 to higher versions
> (possibly 2.3.5 or so), but always had this error, which is why I am
> always back to 2.3.3.
>
This bug was already known. It is tracked internally as DOV-3600. Looks
like
2019 Oct 11
2
Panic: file smtp-client-connection.c: line 1212 (smtp_client_connection_established): assertion failed: (!conn->connect_succeeded)
Hello Aki,
I have this problem just with 2.3.8, my self-compiled 2.3.3 works fine.
I have previously tried to update from 2.3.3 to higher versions
(possibly 2.3.5 or so), but always had this error, which is why I am
always back to 2.3.3.
Configuration is exactly the same.
Here my output from "doveconf -n":
# 2.3.8 (9df20d2db): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf# Pigeonhole version
0.5.8
2018 Oct 12
0
Sieve scripts not replicated
Hi,
FWIW this was also reported back in August[1] - experienced with 2.3.2.1
(not sure if earlier 2.3 releases were affected) and currently
reproducible with latest 2.3.3 stable release.
[1] https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-August/112548.html
Cheers,
Tony
On 2018-10-12 04:26, Pascal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use dovecot replication and the sieve scripts are not
2018 Oct 12
2
Sieve scripts not replicated
Hello,
I use dovecot replication and the sieve scripts are not replicated. Mail
replication is working fine.
Log when sieve script (with Rainloop webmail) is created:
Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot: managesieve-login: Login:
user=<hativ at example.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=91.67.174.186,
lip=195.201.251.57, mpid=5360, TLS, session=<OXvK9QV4fOBbQ666>
Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot:
2018 Jul 31
0
Get rid of the "dbox-Mails"-folder
Would it be possible to add the possibility in future releases that
DIRNAME respectively FULLDIRNAME could be empty (and works properly)?
Greetings,
Hativ
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: Get rid of the "dbox-Mails"-folder
Datum: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 15:40:46 +0200
Von: Hativ <hativ3 at gmail.com>
An: dovecot at dovecot.org
Hey Aki,
DIRNAME with
2018 Jul 08
2
Get rid of the "dbox-Mails"-folder
Hey Aki,
DIRNAME with empty value has no effect, just like with FULLDIRNAME.
"~/sdbox" instead of "~/" doesn't change that..
Greetings,
Hativ
Am 07.07.2018 um 20:24 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
> Does it work better if you use
>
> mail_location=sdbox:~/sdbox:DIRNAME=
>
>
>
> ---
> Aki Tuomi
> Dovecot oy
>
> -------- Original message --------
>
2018 Jul 07
1
Get rid of the "dbox-Mails"-folder
Hey again,
sorry, but I have to correct me: Even with dot it's not working
completely. The subscriptions file is not created and the dovecot-acl
file has the wrong path, too.
:-(
Greetings,
Hativ
Am 07.07.2018 um 02:26 schrieb Hativ:
> Hey again,
>
> I've found a working configuration: mail_location = sdbox:~/:FULLDIRNAME=.
>
> I use a dot instead of slash or empty
2016 Dec 14
1
netbios alias and AD trouble
Hello there
I've got two samba servers srv1 and srv2
smb.conf for srv1:
netbios aliases srv1-alias
smb.conf for srv2:
netbios aliases srv2-alias
DNS is configured all right and resolves the names. Each name has got
its own IP address.
Both servers are AD members, run as expected and can be connected to via
their netbios and netbios alias names.
If, for example, srv1 fails I want to add
2018 Jul 07
0
Get rid of the "dbox-Mails"-folder
Hey again,
I've found a working configuration: mail_location = sdbox:~/:FULLDIRNAME=.
I use a dot instead of slash or empty value.
Now my folder structure looks like I want and Dovecot is working fine.
Can anyone (maybe even a Dovecot developer?) say if the configuration is
okay? I've tried to check the source code, but I don't know C as good as
it's needed for that.
2012 Apr 20
1
Upgrading from V3.0 production system to V3.3
Before I undertake this upgrade I thought I would see if anyone has any advice
on how to do this on a production system. Maybe someone has already "fought
this dragon".
Current config Gluster V3.0.0. This has been in production for over 16 months:
2 servers with 8 x 2TB hard drives (bricks) replicated
svr1:vol1 <-> srv2:vol1 -> rbrick1
svr1:vol2 <-> srv2:vol2 ->
2009 Nov 21
3
Connect two Asterisk Server in IAX ?
Hi
My first post get no answer :=<, i post new with new elements.
I have two Asterisk server, running on Asterisk 1.6:
SRV1 = 192.168.0.5 on Asterisk 1.6.1.4
SRV2 = 192.168.0.20 on Asterisk 1.6.1.8
I want create a link for exchange call.
on Srv1:
iax.conf:
[general]
bindport=4569
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
language=fr
bandwidth=low
jitterbuffer=no
forcejitterbuffer=no
autokill=yes
2008 May 08
0
total server lock-up during CentOS5.1 installation with vnc
Hi,
I would like to share my experience with
total server lock-up during CentOS5.1 installation
using vnc installation method.
My setup was as follows
+--------------------------------------+
| my_PC, CentOS4.6 |
| X, KDE, vncviewer |
| 100Mbit/s eth0 |
| Intel Corporation 82801BA/BAM/CA/CAM |
+------eth0----------------------------+
2017 Sep 27
1
Multiple DC haven't HA on Windows
Thanks Rowland.
2017-09-27 17:49 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:05:31 +0200
> Daniel Carrasco via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello, thanks for your response.
> >
> > I'm using samba_internal as DNS because I don't want to add bind to
> > only relay the internal DNS.
2019 Dec 14
1
Building a replacement Samba4 server to replace a Samba3 system, running into file rights issues.
On 2019-12-08 15:01, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 08/12/2019 18:18, Howard Fleming via samba wrote:
>> I am building a Samba4 setup to replace a Samba3 server I built for
>> small non profit school back in 2012.
>>
>> It is running CentOS 6.x, samba version 3.6.23-52.el6_10. ?Rather
>> than attempt to upgrade this system to Samba4, it makes more sense
2019 Oct 11
0
Panic: file smtp-client-connection.c: line 1212 (smtp_client_connection_established): assertion failed: (!conn->connect_succeeded)
On 11.10.2019 10.50, Hativ via dovecot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after migrating from self-compiled Dovecot 2.3.3 to Dovecot 2.3.8 from
> the repository (Ubuntu?18.04 LTS "Bionic" packages) I have issues with
> the submission service. If I send an email, it will not be forwarded
> and I get the following error message:
>
snip...
> Best regards
>
> Hativ
Can
2011 Jan 27
1
libvirtd + vir-manager + kerberos
Hi!
Having two hosts installed with libvirtd, kvm, qemu on (Ubuntu
10.10). Now I have one big problem and one less:
I have set up kerberos for both hosts. Created the principal
"libvirt/srv1.example.org at EXAMPLE.ORG" and
"libvirt/srv2.example.org at EXAMPLE.ORG", Exported the krb5.keytab,
Installed it and tested the servers:
srv1.example.org: I can connect using kerberos
2008 Aug 07
3
GlusterFS
Hi everybody,
We use a Dovecot setup with GlusterFS. Dovecot 1.1.2 and GlusterFS
1.3.9. I enabled the following options (I don't have posix-locks
translators):
lock_method = dotlock
dotlock_use_excl = no
mmap_disable = yes
mail_nfs_index = yes
mail_nfs_storage = yes
I receive the following error message.
Aug 7 09:38:51 mta2 dovecot: POP3(somebody at domain.tld):
nfs_flush_fcntl:
2017 Sep 27
2
Multiple DC haven't HA on Windows
Hello, thanks for your response.
I'm using samba_internal as DNS because I don't want to add bind to only
relay the internal DNS.
The hosts file is clean on srv2 DC (default localhost), and this is the
srv1 hosts:
192.168.0.251 srv1.domain.com srv1
resolv.conf srv1:
domain domain
search domain.com
nameserver 192.168.0.251
nameserver 8.8.8.8
resolv.conf srv2:
nameserver
2007 Jul 10
4
Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP
Hello,
I am trying to join a Samba 3.0.24 server into an ADS domain, which is
served by two Windows 2003 servers (let's say srv1.domain.local (192.168.1.1)
and srv2.domain.local (192.168.1.4)). I am running Samba on a FreeBSD 6.2
machine and I have established an OpenVPN connection to the ADS network
(tunneling). I have this in my resolv.conf:
2015 May 09
2
KVM Questions
On 05/08/2015 11:41 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> was wondering if this procedure might work to do what I desire:
>
> 1.) Shutdown the VMs
> 2.) Archive the VM image directory /home/vmimages to a network drive
> 3.) Use parted or fdisk to delete present /home partition
> 4.) Use parted or fdisk to re-create smaller/home partition and new vm-images
> 5.) Create XFS file system on