similar to: UNSEEN flag issues with multiple clients

>>>>> "Sami" == Sami Ketola via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> writes: >> On 1 Oct 2019, at 21.45, John Stoffel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've been bugged by this issue for a while, and while I see that the >> \UNSEEN flag is specified in the RFC to be reset once *any*

>>>>> "John" == John Stoffel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> writes: >>>>> "Sami" == Sami Ketola via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> writes: >>> On 1 Oct 2019, at 21.45, John Stoffel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've been

> On 1 Oct 2019, at 21.45, John Stoffel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I've been bugged by this issue for a while, and while I see that the > \UNSEEN flag is specified in the RFC to be reset once *any* client > connects and looks at a mailbox, I was wondering if there's a way to > change the behavior so that it's

> On 2 Oct 2019, at 17.01, John Stoffel <john at stoffel.org <mailto:john at stoffel.org>> wrote: > To look at all the mailboxes on the server and see how many RECENT > mails there are. For the postfix-users list, I see that there are 6 > recent messages. And if I do the list of mailboxes command again, it > returns the same count. Then if I go and look at the

Agreed? Is Mailmate an option for you? > On Aug 10, 2020, at 7:51 PM, John Stoffel <john at stoffel.org> wrote: > > > Antonio> Thanks a million for your insight. I believe this is the thread to which you refer: > > Antonio> https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2019-October/117219.html > > Yes, that's the thread. It looks like it's an Apple

I'm trying to diagnose a really strange situation where certain emails, when submitted to the mailbox by Postfix, are not considered to be unseen by Dovecot. During testing, I've shut down anything else on the server that might want to access the mailbox. I submit the email to the local postfix instance which then says it has delivered it to the mailbox: Dec 23 09:51:35 ip-10-35-194-108

> On 7. Jun 2020, at 18.20, John Stoffel <john at stoffel.org> wrote: > >>>>>> "Gingko" == Gingko <ldiff001 at gingko.ovh> writes: > > Gingko> I also have issues using Dovecot Backup. > > Gingko> I am trying to Backup (or possibly Sync - one way) a single > Gingko> user IMAP account from a remote server, unknown type, to my

On Monday, December 23, 2019 11:22:27 AM CET, Sami Ketola wrote: > change your configuration to use some more optimized mailbox > format and configure postfix to deliver over dovecot-lda or > lmtp. or, since you already use doveadm, tell dovecot to index your mailbox manually before your 'doveadm status' command: doveadm -v index -q -u local-it-support INBOX greetings...

On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 at 08:04, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > On 23/12/2019 22:17 Michael < ml at hemathor.de> wrote: > > > On Monday, December 23, 2019 11:22:27 AM CET, Sami Ketola wrote: > > change your configuration to use some more optimized mailbox > format and configure postfix to deliver over dovecot-lda or > lmtp. > > or,

This does not look bad, pretty ok. But im do have a question here. > ipaddress: 10.103.1.6 X.X.103.1 This indicated that the primary interface is eno2 > 2: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP > ??? inet 10.103.1.6/24 brd 10.103.1.255 scope global eno2 > 3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP > ??? inet

Hello, I also have issues using Dovecot Backup. I am trying to Backup (or possibly Sync - one way) a single user IMAP account from a remote server, unknown type, to my own server. For that purpose, I defined the following parameters : imapc_host = <host name> imapc_user = <user name> imapc_password = <password> imapc_features = rfc822.size (<user name> has format:

Hello, i'm using libvirt/kvm/qemu on a stable Debian Linux KVM 4.9.0-6-amd64 . qemu-kvm : 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u5 libvirt-daemon : 3.0.0-4+deb9u3 libvirt-clients : 3.0.0-4+deb9u3 virt-manager : 1:1.4.0-5 virt-viewer : 5.0-1 virtinst : 1:1.4.0-5 My guests are made with this kind of command line : virt-install --connect=qemu:///system --name=debian --ram=2048 --disk

> On 23 Dec 2019, at 11.57, Philip Colmer <philip.colmer at linaro.org> wrote: > > I'm trying to diagnose a really strange situation where certain emails, when submitted to the mailbox by Postfix, are not considered to be unseen by Dovecot. > > During testing, I've shut down anything else on the server that might want to access the mailbox. I submit the email to the

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:08:00 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > How do you deliver then mails to the server? > > also mbox is very unoptimised mailbox format for this. Each time mail is deleted from mbox mailbox the whole mbox while needs to be rewritten to remove the mail. OpenSMTPD and Dovecot run on the same machine. OpenSMTPD receives incoming mails and

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> <br> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 23/12/2019 22:17 Michael < <a href="mailto:ml@hemathor.de">ml@hemathor.de</a>> wrote: </div> <div> <br>

Good day Guys I forgot to add and mention a very important piece of the puzzle. We are making use of dovecots compression plugin. I.e. https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/zlib_plugin/#compression Regards Brent Clark On 2019/11/11 14:49, Brent Clark wrote: > Good day Aki > > Thanks ever so much for replying. > > Interesting that you ask the version of dovecot. Any

Hello list, we are experimenting with using Dovecot as part of a simplified mail stack with SQL for a internal messaging / notification system for our customers. Sometimes we need to send a message to thousands of customers at once and we do it by having aliases resolve to 10k and 20k+ mail accounts. When we send such a message the server load (obviously) is very high for a few minutes (in case

Hi John, Thanks a million for your insight. I believe this is the thread to which you refer: https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2019-October/117219.html <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2019-October/117219.html> > On Jul 30, 2020, at 5:48 AM, John Stoffel <john at stoffel.org> wrote: > >>>>>> "Antonio" == Antonio Leding <tech at