similar to: Mail messages are occasionally getting "stuck" behind one message on the server with POP3

Hello everyone, in february I posted the mail below[1]. I can now reproduce the problem. When filling up a mailbox with postfix' smtp-source with dozens of identical mails, then it is never possible for me to fetch one single mail out of the mailbox. The process of fetching mail via POP3 always fails. It makes no difference which mail client I use. I have tested KMail, Outlook and

What exactly is your alignment settings in your LLVM struct? Something like this would tell you the alignment of "something". const llvm::DataLayout dl(theModule); size_t size = dl.getPrefTypeAlignment(something); IIn "my" compiler, I don't do anything special to align structs, so it's plausibly your specific data-layout that says that i64 only needs aligning to

I think I see a potential issue. My ExecutionEngine setup may not be using the same target as my object code emitting, and in this test case I'm running in the ExecutionEngine.  I'll go over this code to ensure I'm creating the same triple and see if that helps -- I'm assuming it will, since I can't imagine the exact same triple with clang would produce a different layout. On

Hello everyone, I have two mailservers [1] running dovecot. Mail store format is maildir. Every once in a while I have the following problem: When a User downloads his mail via POP3, the client says something like "the server has closed the connection unexpectedly, and gives this reason: [...blahblah...]". One can now cancel the download, and restart it, and the problem shows up again

Hello, I'm currently experiencing, that 0 messages are shown at the pop3-prompt: list +OK 0 messages: . But the cur-folder containes 74 files. How can this happen? Why aren't they removed physically? Regards Marten Lehmann

I'm encountering a few problems in my migration that I haven't yet figured out. `getOrInsertFunction` is generating a SEGFAULT at FunctionType::isValidArgumentType(llvm::Type*).  I'm calling it as:     generic_ptr_ = llvm::PointerType::get( llvm::Type::getInt8Ty(context), 0 );     f_natural_int = llvm::IntegerType::get(context, 64);     module->getOrInsertFunction(        

On 05/05/18 17:58, Andres Freund wrote: > You're building LLVM with assertions enabled > (-DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON). > Some of those are fairly expensive... > Is there another way to get LLVM to check the correctness of my IR without the assertions? That's what I'm assuming I need the flag for (it's been a long time since I experimented with it) If there is no way

It sounds like your DataLayout may not match clang's for x86_64-linux. What does it say about the alignment of i64? On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:05 PM edA-qa mort-ora-y via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'm creating a struct of `{i8,i64}` and `DataLayout::getTypeAllocSize` > is returning `12`. `getStructLayout` also gives an `4` offset for the > second

The dovecot -n output is attached to this email. Filename dovecot-n_filtered.conf. Dovecot Version: 2.2.10 OS: CentOS 6.6 MTA: Postfix version 2.6.6 The system is using dsync between two mailbox servers. Problem: When a pop3 session deletes a new message and the pop3 session ends, the message is not deleted. On a subsequent pop3 session, the same messages is deleted again and when the session

I don't know if I'm setting the triple of my execution engine correctly.  This is leading to an issue where a struct `{i8,i64}` is not getting the same layout as the ABI expects. I setup my engine/module like this:      llvm::SmallVector<std::string,2> mattrs;      llvm::EngineBuilder builder{ unique_ptr<llvm::Module>(module) };      llvm::ExecutionEngine * ee = builder.    

I'm creating a struct of `{i8,i64}` and `DataLayout::getTypeAllocSize` is returning `12`. `getStructLayout` also gives an `4` offset for the second element. The native ABI, and clang, for the same type are producing a size of 16, with an alignment of 8, for the second element. This is for the system triple "x86_64-linux-gnu" What could be causing this difference in alignment and

I'm rather new to Wine, and I'm trying to run a Java Swing application. I'm having trouble with it. Has anyone else gotten Swing-based apps to run? I have a test case, basically a swing "hello world" app, and I haven't been able to get it to work either. Here's what happens when I try to compile it: [dritch@twitch wine]$ wine -- c:/jdk1.3/bin/javac -g -d

Taking one step back, I'm not clear I'm even setting the triple/DataLayout on the module correctly:     module = new llvm::Module( "test", *llvm_context );     module->setTargetTriple( platform::target->triple ); Is that enough to create an appropriate DataLayout for the module?  I don't see anyway to convert a triple to a DataLayout, so I can't call

Hello. I have seen in recent posts that there are other people with this problem, and it is very important for me, as it is the only cause for not putting Dovecot in production in all mail servers in my University. When moving/copying messages, some of them get stuck in the tmp directory of the destination folder, effectively lost for the user. I have been tracing the problem, and it looks that

Hi edaqa, You might need to set your TargetOptions before calling selectTarget. E.g. builder.setTargetOptions(Opts).selectTarget(...); Or you could just let EngineBuilder call selectTarget for you (which is what the no-argument version of EngineBuilder::create does): llvm::ExecutionEngine * ee = builder. setErrorStr( &errStr ). setEngineKind( llvm::EngineKind::JIT ).

I'm implementing function arguments and tested this code in C:     // clang -emit-llvm ll_struct_arg.c -S -o /dev/tty     typedef struct vpt_data {         char a;         int b;         float c;     } vpt_data;         void vpt_test( vpt_data vd ) {     }     int main() {         vpt_data v;         vpt_test(v);     } This emits an odd LLVM structure that casts to the desired struct type,

Hi, Could you share how you compile IR and which version of JIT you use (Orc, MCJIT)? Could it be that you are using interpreter instead of actual JIT? Cheers, Alex. > On 5. May 2018, at 08:04, edA-qa mort-ora-y via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm having issues of my compiler, and JIT execution, of LLVM IR being > rather slow. It's accounting for

There appears to be a difference between passing by value:     call void @foo(%some_struct %v) And using the `byval` attribute on a pointer:     call void @foo(%some_struct* byval %v) They are not compatible with each other yet logically do the same thing.  The second form is the one that appears to work with the ABI on linux, and the first one not. What is the reason for the difference? --

.PLS files should work for iOS devices. See sample text: [playlist] numberofentries=1 File1=http://91.121.91.172:31090/LG73 Title1=LG73 Vancouver's Best Music Mix! Length1=-1 Version=2 On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Holden Stanford <hstanford1 at gmail.com> wrote: > You can create a .m3u or .mp3 container linking to the stream URL. I can't > remember the exact tags

Does an array of a value type and a structure containing only that type have the same alignment requirements?  That is, in C-syntax: float* array; struct point { float x; float y; } point p; array = (float*)&p; Does `array[0]` now refer to x, and `array[1]` to y? I'm creating these structures in LLVM with default packing (StructType::isPacked == false). I have a library that takes