similar to: Since multiple ,matches

Hello, I use FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p7 i386 dovecot-2.1.6 dovecot-pigeonhole-0.3.0_1 I have the following problem: When I use the following script - the flag is set in \Seen : require ["imap4flags"]; # rule:[test] if anyof (header :contains "Subject" "test") { setflag "\\Seen"; stop; } . SELECT INBOX * OK [CLOSED] Previous mailbox

Dear list, I want to define two concurrent rules : 1. I want to flag an e-mail containing the word "cloud" in the body 2. I want to move mail sent explicitly to me (as opposed to mail sent to an alias I am part of) going to "INOBX.I must answere this" If I put rule (1) first, everything works as expected. If put rule (2) first, only that rule applies. Here's a small test

I have the following, and it works: require ["include","fileinto","imap4flags","variables"]; global "MyFlags"; if header :contains ["X-LERCTR-Spam-Flag","X-TNTSCAN-Spam-Flag"] "YES" { redirect "spamtrap at spambouncer.org"; addflag "MyFlags" "\\Seen Junk"; fileinto :flags

Op 28-5-2018 om 14:18 schreef daniel_1983 at protonmail.com: > Dear list, > I want to define two concurrent rules : > 1. I want to flag an e-mail containing the word "cloud" in the body > 2. I want to move mail sent explicitly to me (as opposed to mail sent to an alias I am part of) going to "INOBX.I must answere this" > > If I put rule (1) first, everything

Ok. I tried another Thunderbird-specific Flag: require ["imap4flags", "vnd.dovecot.pipe", "copy", "imapsieve", "environment", "variables"]; if environment :matches "imap.email" "*" { ? set "email" "${1}";?? } addflag "Junk"; addflag "\\seen"; addflag "$label3"; pipe

Now i tried an additional rule in my "normal" working sieve-filter: if address :domain :matches "from" "company.example" ? { setflag "\\seen"; fileinto :create "INBOX/foo/test"; stop; } and sent an email from my company-account. The folder INBOX/foo/test gets created, but the message inside is not marked as seen. So i think, this is a bug in

Hi Volker! This is what I wanted to avoid with my question. I reported my script with only three word just to make an example but my list is quite longer than this. Let's suppose a list of 30 or 40 words... 30 or 40 rules? Possible but very unconfortable to manage. A more compact version of the script could be this: -- the script begins ------------ require ["fileinto",

Hi Ralph! This is, what calls the correct sive-filter rules. I have that already in use. But the file file:/etc/dovecot/sievepipe/report-spam contains my sieve-script from my first posting. So, the difference from setflag to addflag is, setflag sets the flags, and only the given flags (removing all other flags), and addflag adds a flag to the existing flags... I fiddled around a little... The

2.3.4/0.5.4 (dovecot/pigeonhole) Note the casing on the \\Seen flag. On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 9:02 AM Jakobus Sch?rz <wertstoffe at nurfuerspam.de> wrote: > Which version of dovecot are you using? > > > jakob > > Am 04.12.18 um 15:44 schrieb Larry Rosenman: > > I have the following, and it works: > > require

Yes. I did it the same way, Larry described. And i have in my sieve-script, which i use also for years the other notation i tried before, many times in use. The last month it did not recognize, that this rules won't work any longer. Today i played around a little, then i saw, it won't work to set the \Seen-Flag... Please be aware, i can set Junk-Flag, and Thunderbird shows me the Emails

Which version of dovecot are you using? jakob Am 04.12.18 um 15:44 schrieb Larry Rosenman: > I have the following, and it works: > require ["include","fileinto","imap4flags","variables"]; > global "MyFlags"; > if header :contains ["X-LERCTR-Spam-Flag","X-TNTSCAN-Spam-Flag"] "YES" > { > redirect

I've been using that recipe for YEARS, and it DOES work for me on FreeBSD (I'm also the port maintainer for dovecot and pigeonhole). Not sure exactly what you are doing wrong, but I use lmtp to deliver the mail to mbox formatted mailboxes. On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 9:11 AM Jakobus Sch?rz <wertstoffe at nurfuerspam.de> wrote: > I tried it like you... doesn't work. The message

I have an additional information. Moving a already seen messsage to another imap-folder (drag&drop in thunderbird) shows this email in the other folder as unseen and recent. Is this normal behaviour? BR Jakob Am 04.12.18 um 16:36 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz: > Yes. I did it the same way, Larry described. > > And i have in my sieve-script, which i use also for years the other >

On 2/11/2015 8:41 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 2/11/2015 7:34 PM, Florin Portase wrote: >> Hello guys, >> >> I'm having troubles making "script_after" to exec sieve scripts:: >> > Keep in mind that the sieve_after script is only executed when the > "keep" action [1] is executed or when the implicit "keep" [2] is still >

I tried it like you... doesn't work. The message gets all the other flags, but not the \Seen-Flag. My repo is https://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest/debian/stretch stretch dpkg -l|grep dove ii? dovecot-core????????????????????? 2:2.3.4-2~stretch????????????? amd64??????? secure POP3/IMAP server - core files ii? dovecot-imapd???????????????????? 2:2.3.4-2~stretch????????????? amd64???????

Hi there! I want to set the \seen and the Junk Flag to an email, which i move manually to my Junk-Folder. I tried a lot... but nothing worked like expected. I have a sieve-filter, which takes an email and copy it to a pipe to rspamc. This filter is working correctly, i get a debug-message from the script, which is called through the sieve-filter. But adding another rule (addflag

Hi everybody! I manage a mail server running Dovecot 2.2.21 with Pigeonhole 0.4.10. I successfully configured sieve and use it also to filter some spam messages. Here is one of the script I use to filter messages on the basis of prohibited words in message body. As you can see, the last command writes to the log the action of this script. -- the script begins ------------ require

Did you notice the fileinto :flags usage? It comes from imap4sieve extension. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5232#page-7 Aki > On 04 December 2018 at 17:13 Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I've been using that recipe for YEARS, and it DOES work for me on FreeBSD > (I'm also the port maintainer for dovecot and pigeonhole). > > Not sure

On 2015-02-12 01:01, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 2/11/2015 10:37 PM, Portase Florin wrote: On 2/11/2015 8:41 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: On 2/11/2015 7:34 PM, Florin Portase wrote: Hello guys, > > I'm having troubles making "script_after" to exec sieve scripts:: > > Keep in mind that the sieve_after script is only executed when the > "keep" action [1 [1]]

Hello Dovecot users, This is a bugfix release to mend some problems that were found in v0.5.0. The imap4flags bug is actually not first seen in the 0.5.0 release (it is ancient), but I included the fix for it anyway. Changelog v0.5.0.1: - imap4flags extension: Fix binary corruption occurring when setflag/addflag/removeflag flag-list is a variable. - sieve-extprograms plugin: Fix segfault