Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Character not allowed in mailbox name"
2019 Jul 22
2
Fwd: Character not allowed in mailbox name
Hi Arnold,
thanks for your assistance. I solved the issue right now by changing
prefix = Shared/%%u/
to
prefix = Shared/%%n/
This omits the @mydomain.de part which holds the dot causing the
trouble. Why this became a problem due to the update I wouldn't know.
Regards
Lothar
Am 22.07.2019 um 10:49 schrieb Arnold Opio Oree:
> Hi Lothar,
>
> I haven't yet had the opportunity to
2019 Jul 04
9
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive.
Hi all,
The guidance provided so far has been really helpful, and has helped a
great deal to bringing down wasted energy on finding and executing a
viable path. I am now at the final due action to complete our Dovecot
application to our use-case, but am stuck on an issue that I cannot
find any easily accessible documentation on.
Generally this is what has been done:
1. Uploaded the enterprise
2019 Jul 10
1
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive - BUG REPORTS!
Your report is most appreciated, though it lacked quite a lot of detail
that could've expedited the investigation why it happened. With the
further information we can hopefully figure out why you are experiencing
the problems you reported. There is no offense intended.
Aki
On 10.7.2019 14.01, Arnold Opio Oree via dovecot wrote:
> Hello Timo,
>
> I have scheduled some time to carry
2019 Jun 27
3
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive.
Am 27.06.2019 um 07:35 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
>
> On 26.6.2019 22.12, Arnold Opio Oree via dovecot wrote:
>> Hello to you all,
>>
>> I'd like to ask about my intended application of Dovecot to create a folder-hierarchy for storing our enterprise emails, which are treated as live data?rather than archives for compliance or occasional / reactive retrieval.
2019 Jun 27
2
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive.
Hello Aki,
Thank you greatly for your advice, it is really valuable to know that
the key criteria for our desired application of Dovecot are
supported (our groupware stacks are running Dovecot 2.3.4.1) prior to
commencing operations to configure Dovecot and migrate enterprise data.
Thanks for the word of caution with regards to mbox format; that was a
slip of the tongue on my part, our groupware
2019 Jul 08
1
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive - BUG REPORTS!
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Hi!
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Thank you for reporting these. We will look into them. In the mean time, can you see if any of these are fixed in 2.3.6?
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
2019 Jun 26
3
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive.
Hello to you all,
I'd like to ask about my intended application of Dovecot to create a
folder-hierarchy for storing our enterprise emails, which are treated
as live data rather than archives for compliance or occasional /
reactive retrieval.
The data is presently not that large (a few gigabytes), but it is
expected to grow rapidly. Up to this stage the data has been
containedin a Microsoft
2019 Jul 22
0
Character not allowed in mailbox name
On 22 Jul 2019, at 10.34, Lothar Schilling via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Arnold,
>
> thanks for your assistance. I solved the issue right now by changing
>
> prefix = Shared/%%u/
> to
> prefix = Shared/%%n/
>
> This omits the @mydomain.de part which holds the dot causing the
> trouble. Why this became a problem due to the update I
2019 Jul 10
0
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive - BUG REPORTS!
Hello Timo,
I have scheduled some time to carry through the test requested by Aki.
I will add responding to you as part of that process.
Not sure if I have said or done anything to offend you, as your tone
appears quite abrasive, even where you do not have an actual response
to an observation.
It is my view that it is a privilege to provide an open source
platform, and therefore a
2019 Jul 07
0
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive - BUG REPORTS!
Dovecot Team,
I'd like to report a number of bugs, that are to my view all critical.
System: Replicated on multiple Debian 10 (Buster) systems
Dovecot Version(s): 2.3.4.1
doveadm-sync -1/general
1) If DIRNAMEs are not different between command line and mail_location
doveadm sync will fail, saying that the source and destination
directories are the same
2) The -n / -N flags do not work,
2019 Jul 07
0
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive - BUG REPORTS!
Dovecot Team,
I'd like to report a number of bugs, that are to my view all critical.
System: Replicated on multiple Debian 10 (Buster) systemsDovecot
Version(s): 2.3.4.1
doveadm-sync -1/general
1) If DIRNAMEs are not different between command line and mail_location
doveadm sync will fail, saying that the source and destination
directories are the same
2) The -n / -N flags do not work, and a
2019 Jun 27
0
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive.
If you change layout to FS you are basically required to migrate users
to it. You cannot change layout "on the fly".
Aki
On 27.6.2019 13.42, Arnold Opio Oree via dovecot wrote:
> Hello Aki,
>
> Thank you greatly for your advice, it is really valuable to know that
> the key criteria for our desired application of Dovecot are
> supported (our groupware stacks are running
2019 Jun 27
0
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive.
> Also you may run into client limits.... i ve seen this with outlook,
> apple mail, thunderbird via imap in the past
Thanks for this note Robert, it was not really an aspect that I was
considering.
We are operating our groupware services user access through both
Evolution Groupware and KDE Kontact / KMail on Debian Linux
workstations. Hopefully if there is a client issue it should be
2019 Jun 26
0
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive.
Hello to you all,
I'd like to ask about my intended application of Dovecot to create a
folder-hierarchy for storing our enterprise emails, which are treated
as live data rather than archives for compliance or occasional /
reactive retrieval.
The data is presently not that large (a few gigabytes), but it is
expected to grow rapidly. Up to this stage the data has been
containedin a Microsoft
2020 Aug 11
2
Switching roles between 2 DCs
Yep, that did it, thanks a lot, "-k yes" wasn't good enough. There now
was another error, though:
ERROR(<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'>): uncaught exception - 'module'
object has no attribute 'drs_utils'
The solution offered and working is inserting
? import samba
? import samba.getopt as options
? import ldb
+import samba.drs_utils
? from ldb
2019 May 02
2
libvirtd not starting
Hi everybody,
I've set up an new CentOS 7.6.1810 server. Then, via yum I installed
qemu-kvm libvirt libvirt-python libguestfs-tools virt-install. There
were no problems. But when I try to
systemctl start libvirtd
I get the following message:
"libvirtd: process 472: arguments to dbus_message_iter_append_basic()
were incorrect, assertion "_dbus_check_is_valid_utf8 (*string_p)"
2020 Aug 11
2
Switching roles between 2 DCs
Being a newbie to Samba 4 and OpenLDAP I am setting up a DC going
exactly by the rules, testing and taking my time. I got to the point
where I would switch, just testing, roles from DC1 to DC2 and vice
versa. Switching all roles from DC1 to DC2 was a piece of cake,
reswitching "domaindns" and "forestdns" to DC1 wasn't, though:
samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=domaindns -k
2020 Aug 11
2
Switching roles between 2 DCs
Am 11.08.2020 um 16:02 schrieb Rowland penny via samba:
> On 11/08/2020 14:54, Lothar Schilling via samba wrote:
>> Yep, that did it, thanks a lot, "-k yes" wasn't good enough. There now
>> was another error, though:
>>
>> ERROR(<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'>): uncaught exception - 'module'
>> object has no attribute
2020 Aug 25
2
SMB1 disabled - no workgroup available
Hi everybody,
having set up Samba 4.12.6 as DC on Debian 10.5 "smbclient -L dc" give
me this:
Enter PA\root's password:
Anonymous login successful
??????? Sharename?????? Type????? Comment
??????? ---------?????? ----????? -------
??????? sysvol????????? Disk
??????? netlogon??????? Disk
??????? IPC$??????????? IPC?????? IPC Service (Samba 4.12.6-Debian)
SMB1 disabled -- no
2019 May 22
1
Re: libvirtd not starting
Am 03.05.2019 um 16:43 schrieb Martin Kletzander:
> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 02:25:28PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 01:07:32PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> On 5/2/19 12:08 PM, Lothar Schilling wrote:
>>>
>>>> I turned logging up to maximum. That's all I get:
>>>>
>>>> May 2 11:02:06 hl308-3