similar to: NOTIFY: bug on mailbox renaming and deletion ?

Hi, I just updated my Dovecot to the new build in Fedora 26, which is based on 2.2.31. After I did that, Evolution (3.24.3) is no longer receiving notifications about new mail in folders other than inbox (the same version of Evo that worked fine against Dovecot 2.2.30.2). The only folder that still gets notifications is inbox. I see there have been changes to NOTIFY code in this release. What

On 29 Jun 2017, at 13.27, Bojan Smojver <bojan at rexursive.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I just updated my Dovecot to the new build in Fedora 26, which is based > on 2.2.31. After I did that, Evolution (3.24.3) is no longer receiving > notifications about new mail in folders other than inbox (the same > version of Evo that worked fine against Dovecot 2.2.30.2). The only

http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2-notify/ contains the initial implementation of IMAP NOTIFY extension. It's less than half-working, but the difficult part of it is done I think. If I give it a command like: x notify set (personal (messagenew messageexpunge flagchange)) and then in another session I copy a message to another mailbox, it sends: * STATUS "foobar" (MESSAGES 77

Hi I have a disk which two of the partitions are part of a RAID1 setup. I'm trying to rename the the second raided partition mdadm -E /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdc4: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 1.2 Feature Map : 0x1 Array UUID : 83d7657b:ebfddcb7:36b0fa14:d29a350c Name : oldname:2 Creation Time : Tue Aug 30 15:25:10 2016 Raid Level : raid1 Raid Devices : 2

v2.2 hg now has support for NOTIFY extension. The only thing missing is support for SubscriptionChange events. Now would be a good time for IMAP clients to start implementing and testing it. :) I remember K9 developers at least said they were just waiting for Dovecot to support it first. v2.2 implements some other extensions also: BINARY, CATENATE and MOVE. Stephan has also implemented URLAUTH

your work on NOTIFY was brought to my attention, and I see it hasn't been changed in two months, a week after you announced it. a few users and some mail admins have been wanting something like this for k9 mail, which I help develop. what is the current status? is it worth installing and starting work in getting k9 to support it yet? I'd offer help on your end, but I just know java and

I can report that the computer renaming worked. As it turned out, only the cn was incorrect ... ldbsearch -H ldap://DC1 -UAdministrator 'CN=DT06' dn: CN=DT06,OU=Desktops,OU=Computers,DC=domain,DC=com objectClass: computer cn: DT06 operatingSystem: Windows 10 Pro displayName: WH23$ sAMAccountName: WH23$ ... so a simple LDAP rename worked ... ldbrename -H ldap://DC1 -UAdministrator

I wonder what is point of checkign file/dir create mode like this? Here it makes problems since some folders have different permissions than others but both are accessible/writable by user. So renaming is possible (as renaming according to unix permissions). Yet dovecot artificially prevents this. /* if we're renaming under another mailbox, require its permissions to

Hi Si-Wei, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on net/master] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Si-Wei-Liu/failover-allow-name-change-on-IFF_UP-slave-interfaces/20190329-195445 config: x86_64-lkp (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make

Hi Si-Wei, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on net/master] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Si-Wei-Liu/failover-allow-name-change-on-IFF_UP-slave-interfaces/20190329-020744 config: openrisc-or1ksim_defconfig (attached as .config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 6.0.0 20160327 (experimental) reproduce: wget

Hi, For a few weeks I've been running a custom notification script[1] that uses IMAP NOTIFY. The script uses a single connection, sets up a NOTIFY watch on a couple of mailboxes + automatic FETCH for the selected mailbox. If a status update arrives for a different mailbox, it selects that box and fetches the mail. Today I got the following error in the log: > Aug 5 14:56:12 karif

2011/6/1 Sergey Talchuk <tals1975 at gmail.com> > Hi Arnaud, > Hi Sergey, > Vivaldi 650VA UPS works with richcomm_usb driver. > (USB ID 0925:1234) > http://www.vivaldi.su/products/ups/1949.htm > thanks for your report, I've committed an entry in the hardware compatibility list (r3017), and it's part of the just-release 2.6.1. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix

Hello, I've installed the Nokia Series 40 Theme Studio with Wine on Ubuntu Dapper but can't find how to launch it. I've searched through the file system but can't find any trace of the app. What I am missing ? Thanks. -- kael

On 27/06/19 7:58 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for CentOS 6. > And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has become hard > [for me] to use). > > What alternitives are there? (Chrome and Chromium are not possible with > CentOS, and Chrome and Chromium are actually worse). > I have been using Vivaldi

Hi! I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildir that should appear like 'Shared/<mailboxname>' to the clients. Using the namespace configuration below, everything works fine, exept one thing: Mail clients (only tested with Thunderbird) won't allow to put mails directly in 'Shared/mailboxname' (the folder it is greyed out). You currently have to create

Samba V3, tdbsam backend. I've had to change the workgroup name in smb.conf on a Samba PDC (ie, I've changed the domain name). However, the old domain name still shows up in Windows PCs' "Microsoft Windows Network" (together with the new name, which works just fine). I want to remove the old domain name, and I assume it is still showing because it is still present in

Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:48:13AM CET, si-wei.liu at oracle.com wrote: >When a netdev appears through hot plug then gets enslaved by a failover >master that is already up and running, the slave will be opened >right away after getting enslaved. Today there's a race that userspace >(udev) may fail to rename the slave if the kernel (net_failover) >opens the slave earlier than when

I encountered strange behaviour of "msdfs" when using together with "netbios aliases". E.g I have in smb.conf: [global] netbios name = server netbios aliases = server-oldname .... host msdfs = Yes [share1] path = /var/samba/share1 [share2] msdfs root = Yes msdfs proxy = \penguin\share2 .... From a windows (XP) machine I can now see: \\server\share1 and

I am very new to Rails. After skimming through the documentation over the last several days, I''m struggling with the appropriate use of belongs_to. My main question is whether a model can have several belongs_to declarations. I have not seen any examples online show that usage. If it can, then I would like to know if it''s poor form or what the best practices are around

I found some time in the past week to work on a simple test app that would hopefully help to answer a few questions that came up recently: 1. Can a single-process generator+receiver work well? (Looks good so far, but I haven't run any multi-processor timing tests yet.) 2. How easy is it to use librsync? (Pretty easy.) 3. How small would a transfer-only tool be? (It's currently