similar to: Changes in sieve Dovecot 2.2

On 11.01.2018 12:09, CP wrote: > On 01/11/2018 11:49 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> >> On 11.01.2018 11:45, CP wrote: >>> Hello list, >>> >>> I'm trying to setup sieve on a Debian 9 install with virtual users. >>> Perhaps I'm getting old, but I can't figure out why managesieve is >>> not working for virtual users. I have about 20 v

Am 05.12.2019 um 14:51 schrieb Gter Marcelo via dovecot: > Hi Dear, > > I running the command bellow and quota fix for some hours, but after 4 ou 5 > hours de quota back return the % wrong. > > Same after 100% the size in MAILDIR quota return 45% used only again. Are you using LDA/LMTP to deliver messages to the inbox? -- Alex JOST

Hi Dears, I have one problem with Dovecot in My mailserver. Dovecot Quota setting is not working fine. plugin { quota = dict:User quota::file:MAILDIR/dovecot-quota quota_rule = *:storage=1GB } For example if i put the limit in 1GB, i have accounts in my mailbox with size of maildir in 3gb,4gb for exemple and if i running the command doveadm quota get -u ACCOUNT_MY_USER The user with 2GB

On 11.01.2018 11:45, CP wrote: > Hello list, > > I'm trying to setup sieve on a Debian 9 install with virtual users. > Perhaps I'm getting old, but I can't figure out why managesieve is > not working for virtual users. I have about 20 v users on this machine > and only one has also a real unix account. The sieve rules work for this > single unix account? but not

I was wondering if there is any objection to removing the 2-element minimum on the eachOf, anyOf and allOf matchers. It is frustrating when playing with matchers to have to edit significant amounts of code to be able to temporarily go from 2 to 1 matcher inside an any- or allOf matcher. And overall it feels very "un-set-theory"-like. The change was made here:

On 18 Jul 2020, at 11:23, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > On 12/07/2020 22:47, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 12 Jul 2020, at 10:17, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: >>> @lbutlr skrev den 2020-07-12 16:43: >>>> I an trying to write a sieve action that will take mail that is >>>> addressed to a user only it is filed in a mailbox

I am seeking to implement the following behavor: When a headset on phone1 is picked up, phone2 rings right away, without any need to dial numbers on phone1. Is this possible to implement? ScriptHead -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060120/0892441d/attachment.htm

On 12 Jul 2020, at 10:17, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > @lbutlr skrev den 2020-07-12 16:43: >> I an trying to write a sieve action that will take mail that is >> addressed to a user only it is filed in a mailbox (e.g. "Direct") if >> it is to the email AND to any other email address, then file it in a >> mailbox named, e.g. "Cc". And

Not sure who owns this bit of code, so sending this to the general list. It looks like there may be an unintentional fall through happening in the X86RegisterInfo::getCallPreservedMask function. http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/X86RegisterInfo_8cpp_source.html case CallingConv::Intel_OCL_BI

Even if it still did add overhead, it seems perfectly reasonable, from a user's perspective (namely mine), that if I introduce unnecessary narrowing matchers to my chain that there may be a performance penalty. The ability to do the following easily outweighs any performance issues for me: anyOf ( /* hasName("..."), */ hasName("...") ) though C++ not allowing

why do you not simply shut up? # sieve rule require ["imap4flags"]; # rule:[reindl] if allof (header :contains "From" "h.reindl at thelounge.net") { setflag ["\\Seen","\\Flagged"]; stop; }

I an trying to write a sieve action that will take mail that is addressed to a user only it is filed in a mailbox (e.g. "Direct") if it is to the email AND to any other email address, then file it in a mailbox named, e.g. "Cc". And if the mail is not addressed to the user at all, sieve does nothing with it. Message 1: to foo at example.com => Direct Message 2: to/cc foo at

Hi all, ok, I just instealled the dovecot 2.0.0 release, and the latest mercurial pigeonhole source. All is well, except for a particular sieve rule that may not be working right. It is a simple rule that looks like this : require ["fileinto","imap4flags"]; # rule:[Past Due Notices] if allof (header :contains "Subject" "Account Past Due Notice") {

Hello! Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) After the update to pigeonhole version 0.4.22 the following configuration does not work. With version 0.4.21 it works. dovecot.conf (only sieve configuration) --------------------------------------------------------------- managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope

Hi, wel, i didn't solve it, i just let my users print multiple times and if they want lots of prints, i print it for them. What you can do, ( i didn't ) is add the Domain users to the printer operators But if 1 users change the printer settings it goes to all users. > I also have people unable to delete each other's jobs while they are >allowed in CUPS. this is correct

Hey, all. I'm rather new to wine development, so please point me at the right place to post diffs if this isn't it. This patch implements RtlGetNtVersionNumbers, called by lots of windows XP apps (including winver, cmd.exe, and regedit). BTW, are we just not bothering to match ordnals on our exports, or is there some deeper reason for using @s? As the patch says, the API is

Hi, We would like to switch from courier-imap to dovecot. I have installed dovecot on a machine running FreeBSD 6.3 and now testing it. My questions are below: 1. Can I configure dovecot to delete all files that are older, say 10 days, from defined mail boxes (for example Trash or Spam). 2. After I access mail box (using web mail squirrel imap) all emails moved from 'new' directory

I have to reject office files for a certain domain plus notifying the original recipient about the rejection too. require ["fileinto","reject","body","enotify","variables"]; if allof (address :contains ["To","TO","Cc","CC"] "@example.org", body :content? "application/msword" :contains

I have a rule that sends all mail from root to a mailbox, but I want it to NOT send mail from mailing-lists there. if allof (address :contains :localpart "From" "root", not anyof(exists ["List-Id","List-ID","Mailing-List", "X-List-Name","List-Post"])) { fileinto "root-mail"; stop; }

Hi All, I cannot get the sieve_before to work. I have dovecot & sieve installed on Debian 7 as follows /etc/dovecot/conf.d/90-sieve.conf : plugin { # The path to the user's main active script. If ManageSieve is used, this the # location of the symbolic link controlled by ManageSieve. sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve # The default Sieve script when the user has none. This is a path to a