similar to: Where to report (potential) Dovecot bugs

On 24 Nov 2016, at 9.33, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > >> On 23 Nov 2016, at 0.49, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> If I move messages between namespaces, it appears to ignore the quotas >> I've >>> set on them.

On 09/04/2019 22:03, Mark Moseley via dovecot wrote: > I'm curious if this is still the right place to report potential bugs > with Dovecot.? > > Is there a Dovecot bug tracker somewhere? https://www.dovecot.org/bugreport.html

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:37 PM Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Just hoping to get some dev eyes on this. I'm incredibly reluctant to >> throw the word 'bug' around >> (since 99 times out of 100, it's not -- it's almost always the

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Zhang Huangbin <zhb at iredmail.org> wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 6:08 AM, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > * Do you use the perl poolmon script or something else? The perl script > was > > being weird for me, so I rewrote it in python but it basically does the > > exact same things. >

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > >> On 24 Nov 2016, at 9.33, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: >> > >> >> On

> On December 22, 2017 at 8:20 AM Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > > > > On December 22, 2017 at 6:43 AM Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

On 23 Nov 2016, at 0.49, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > If I move messages between namespaces, it appears to ignore the quotas I've > set on them. A *copy* will trigger the quota error. But a *move* just > happily piles on to the overquota namespace. Is that normal? Probably needs a bit more thinking, but I guess the attached patch would help.

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 24 Feb 2017, at 0.08, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > As someone who is about to begin the process of moving from maildir to > > mdbox on NFS (and therefore just about to start the 'director-ization' of > > everything) for ~6.5m mailboxes, I'm

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > On September 28, 2017 at 7:20 PM Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 27.09.2017 20:14, Mark Moseley

As someone who is about to begin the process of moving from maildir to mdbox on NFS (and therefore just about to start the 'director-ization' of everything) for ~6.5m mailboxes, I'm curious if anyone can share any experiences with it. The list is surprisingly quiet about this subject, and articles on google are mainly just about setting director up. I've yet to stumble across an

> On December 22, 2017 at 6:43 AM Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Is there an appropriate way to return data with spaces in it (or > > presumably other non-alphanum chars. My quota name had a space in it, > > which > > somehow got interpreted as 'yes' , i.e.: > > > > imap:

Just hoping to get some dev eyes on this. I'm incredibly reluctant to throw the word 'bug' around (since 99 times out of 100, it's not -- it's almost always the config), but I can't think of any way that this could be a config issue, esp when the pre-2.2.34 version works as expected. I noticed during troubleshooting that dovecot errors out if I try to create a subfolder

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > On 27.09.2017 20:14, Mark Moseley wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Marcus Rueckert <darix at opensu.se> > wrote: > > > >> On 2017-09-27 16:57:44 +0000, Mark Moseley wrote: > >>> I've been digging into the auth policy stuff with weakforced

In our experience. A ring with more of 4 servers is bad, we have sync problems everyone. Using 4 or less works perfect. Em 24 de fev de 2017 4:30 PM, "Mark Moseley" <moseleymark at gmail.com> escreveu: > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > > >> On 24 Feb 2017, at 0.08, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> writes: Mark> This is just me throwing things out to look at, but did the Mark> client mount on the old server use NFS3 and the new upgraded Mark> client uses NFS4? Sometimes that can cause weirdness with id Mark> mapping.? Another thing to check is selinux, is it enabled? It's one of those

Timo/Aki/Docecot guys, any hints here? Is this a bug? Design issue? On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> We just had a bunch of backend boxes go down due to a DDoS in our >> director cluster. When the DDoS died down, our director ring

Just happened to be surfing the docs and saw this. This is beyond awesome: https://wiki2.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/Lua Any words of wisdom on using it? I'd be putting a bunch of mysql logic in it. Any horrible gotchas there? When it says 'blocking', should I assume that means that a auth worker process will *not* accept any new auth lookups until both auth_passdb_lookup() and

This is a 'has anyone run into this and solved it' post. And yes, I've been reading and re-reading TFM but without luck. The background is that I'm working on tooling before we start a mass maildir->mdbox conversion. One of those tools is recovering mail from backups (easy as pie with maildir). We've got all of our email on Netapp file servers. They have nice snapshotting

On 23 Jun 2017, at 3.44, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > It'd be great if https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-June/104763.html > could make it into this RC (assuming you guys approved it back when it was > submitted) I'll try to get it to 2.2.32. 2.2.31 won't have any changes anymore that aren't absolutely required.

On 18 Dec 2017, at 23.16, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > doveadm(test1-shared at test.com): Panic: file buffer.c: line 97 > (buffer_check_limits): assertion failed: (buf->used <= buf->alloc) .. > /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_sieve_plugin.so(+0x43fe) > [0x6ba6997c33fe] -> Since the panic is coming from pigeonhole, did you