similar to: dovecot[30008]: auth-worker: Fatal: master: service(auth-worker): child 31074 killed with signal 11

I am planning to use zfs with fiber attached san disk from a emc symmetrix''s Based on a note in the admin guide it appears that even though the symmetrixs will handle the hardware raid it is still advisable to create a zfs mirror on the host side to take full advantage of zfs''s self healing/error checking and correcting. is this true ? Additionally I am wondering how the zfs

Hi, I just found out that ZFS triggers a kernel-panic while switching a mounted volume into read-only mode: The system is attached to a Symmetrix, all zfs-io goes through Powerpath: I ran some io-intensive stuff on /tank/foo and switched the device into read-only mode at the same time (symrdf -g bar failover -establish). ZFS went ''bam'' and triggered a Panic: WARNING: /pci at

Hi, is it possible and safe to use more than one RAC-Cluster using OCFS in the same LAN? I'm considering to following setup: a 2-node production and a 2-node test system, the production data is stored in an EMC Symmetrix and for the test-system the production data is copied once to a BCV disk internally. This will give me an new independant copy of the production disk with the same contents,

Hi all, Can anyone explain to me, or point me to any docs that explain how the following numbers map together? I have multiple LUNS exported to my HBA''s from multiple EMC arrays. zpool status, and /dev/dsk show device names like: c0t6006048000038794003753594D333837d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6006048000038794003753594D333838d0 ONLINE 0 0 0

If anyone is running this configuration, I have some questions for you about Page83 data errors. This message posted from opensolaris.org

On 11/24/14 21:17, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hey All, >> >> Has anyone had trouble with Firefox/Thunderbird? >> >> When I log on if I start Thunderbird first then I can't start Firefox. >> Clicking on a link in an email fails to start Firefox. >> >> If I

Hey All, Has anyone had trouble with Firefox/Thunderbird? When I log on if I start Thunderbird first then I can't start Firefox. Clicking on a link in an email fails to start Firefox. If I start Firefox before Thunderbird then hyperlinks in emails open a page in the existing Firefox instance. Other users on this same machine are having the same problems. This has been happening for that

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:49:29 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > What appears is below. Removing dependent packages is required. Removing unused dependencies is optional. dnf remove *subscription* --noautoremove should remove the dependent packages but keep thee unused dependencies if you want them. There's also a setting in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf to set the default behaviour of the autoremove

On 11/28/14 00:47, Philip Manuel wrote: > > On 28/11/14 16:42, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> On 11/24/14 21:17, Mauricio Tavares wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hey All, >>>> >>>> Has anyone had trouble with Firefox/Thunderbird? >>>> >>>>

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:37:20 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > "This system is not registered to Red Hat Subscription Management. You can use > subscription-manager to register." It sounds like you have something installed that doesn't need to be or shouldn't be installed. Under what circumstances does that message appear? I haven't seen it on any of my C8 systems,

Am 11.05.2017 um 20:30 schrieb Larry Martell: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 02:40:04PM -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >>>> I have a CentOS 7 system that I run a home grown python daemon on. I

Hello, Anybody else running into this. I am seeing it on two different CentOS boxes I have. yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=base,updates update ... ---> Package abrt.i686 0:2.0.8-6.el6.centos will be updated ---> Package abrt.i686 0:2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: libreport >= 2.0.9-5.el6_3.2 for package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.i686 ... --->

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:03:24 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > I downloaded a Centos 8 image file : > > CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso > > then I installed it as a kvm guest on a Centos 7 host machine. > > I installed a lot of the software; gui and server to give it a test drive. > > Nothing unusual about what I did that I can identify. And the message came up when

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 02:40:04PM -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >> I have a CentOS 7 system that I run a home grown python daemon on. I >> run this same daemon on many other systems without any incident. On >> this one system the daemon seems to die or be killed every day around >>

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> > wrote: > > Am 11.05.2017 um 20:30 schrieb Larry Martell: > >> > >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >>>

I am trying to understand the relevance of the abrt program. It pops up automatically when somethings acts up, but I can't submit anything to RH, because I haven't paid their fees. It is a very bad user experience to go through the whole process of describing what led up to the problem and get to the end of the process and be rejected with an un-fixable error message (because I

Hi All, I've been tuning a server recently and just today this has started to appear in my top/htop output. [root at db1 ~]# ps -aux | grep kernel root 1011 0.0 0.0 212048 4532 ? Ss 13:34 0:00 /usr/bin/abrt-watch-log -F BUG: WARNING: at WARNING: CPU: INFO: possible recursive locking detected ernel BUG at list_del corruption list_add corruption do_IRQ: stack overflow: ear stack overflow

Hi, I am running asterisk 1.8.14.0, It was running fine for last few days and suddenly crashed today In logs I can see that abrt tried to save the core dump but it couldn't Mar 6 12:11:09 localhost kernel: asterisk[26544]: segfault at 72656d69ac ip 0000000000533c19 sp 00007f7db9ce3af0 error 4 in asterisk[400000+1d1000] Mar 6 12:11:15 localhost abrt[31287]: Saved core dump of pid 26528

Hi sbr-services, Could you give me some idea? ### abrt reported the error as below. [root at cupop4 log]# abrt-cli list --since 1488267244 id ad716dbfd3a68bbe0f055e32ebfe562f4f75df43 reason: imap killed by SIGBUS time: Sun Mar 19 2017 10:58:27 AM JST cmdline: dovecot/imap package: dovecot-2.2.10-7.el7 uid: 80180 (acaa2325) count: 2 Directory: