similar to: Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 105 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 105 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)"

2019 Mar 27
0
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 105 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)
On 27 Mar 2019, at 12.42, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > Hello. > > I have one account with heavy traffic (big mails) and quite often > indexes get corrupted. > > This is dovecot 2.3.5 on local fs (xfs), Linux kernel 4.19.20, glibc 2.28. > > When corruption happens lmtp and pop3 segfault on accessing it like: >
2019 Mar 28
1
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 105 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)
On 28 Mar 2019, at 10.15, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz <arekm at maven.pl> wrote: > > error = 0x55e3e2b40ac0 "Fixed index file > /var/mail/piast_efaktury/dovecot.index: log_file_seq 13 -> 15", > nodiskspace = true, This was one of the things I was first wondering, but I'm not sure why it's not logging an error. Anyway, you're using filesystem quota? And this
2019 Mar 28
0
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 105 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)
On 27/03/2019 16:12, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 27 Mar 2019, at 14.58, Timo Sirainen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org > <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >> >>> dovecot isn't able to auto fix the indexes and manual deletion is >>> required in all such cases >> >> So if it keeps repeating, it's very strange. Could you send me
2019 Mar 27
2
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 105 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)
On 27 Mar 2019, at 14.58, Timo Sirainen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > >> dovecot isn't able to auto fix the indexes and manual deletion is >> required in all such cases > > So if it keeps repeating, it's very strange. Could you send me such broken dovecot.index and dovecot.index.log files (without dovecot.index.cache)? They shouldn't contain
2016 Aug 25
0
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 104 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)
On 14.07.2016 10:56, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > 2.2.25 (also happens on 2.2.24). Happens every time I try to make deliver > and only for this user: > > Jul 14 09:52:02 mbox dovecot: lmtp(25601): Connect from local > Jul 14 09:52:02 mbox dovecot: lmtp(powiadomienia): session=<CRU2EaJEh1cBZAAALZVUYQ>, Error: Index /var/mail/powiadomienia/dovecot.index: Lost log for seq=1009
2016 Oct 26
2
multiple SSL certificates story
Hi. Little story :-) I'm playing with dovecot 2.2.25 and multiple SSL certificates. ~7000 certificates which are loaded twice, so my dovecot has ~14 000 certificate pairs (14k key + 14k cert) in config. 14 000 local_name entries. Like these: local_name imap.example.com { ssl_cert = </etc/certs/cert1.pem ssl_key = </etc/certs/cert1.pem } local_name pop3.example.com { ssl_cert =
2016 Nov 10
0
tons of dovecot/config processes
Hi. I've noticed that dovecot (using 2.2.26.0 here) starts dovecot/config processes that stay for long time. Example: [root at ixion-pld ~]# service dovecot restart Stopping Dovecot service.......................................................................................................................................[ DONE ] Starting Dovecot
2007 Dec 12
1
Problem with filenames with commas in them
This is a continuation of my previous problem where cp could copy files whereas rsync couldn't. It turns out that the problem is with files which have commas in their names, rsync can write the initial version of the file but it can't check/rewrite them. Here is the error I get from rsync when trying to overwrite the files (using --inplace) :- home# rsync -r --inplace .in
2016 Nov 01
1
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 104 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)
On 25.08.2016 10:29, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 14.07.2016 10:56, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: >> 2.2.25 (also happens on 2.2.24). Happens every time I try to make deliver >> and only for this user: >> >> Jul 14 09:52:02 mbox dovecot: lmtp(25601): Connect from local >> Jul 14 09:52:02 mbox dovecot: lmtp(powiadomienia): session=<CRU2EaJEh1cBZAAALZVUYQ>, Error:
2016 Jul 14
3
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 104 (mail_transaction_log_file_free): assertion failed: (!file->locked)
2.2.25 (also happens on 2.2.24). Happens every time I try to make deliver and only for this user: Jul 14 09:52:02 mbox dovecot: lmtp(25601): Connect from local Jul 14 09:52:02 mbox dovecot: lmtp(powiadomienia): session=<CRU2EaJEh1cBZAAALZVUYQ>, Error: Index /var/mail/powiadomienia/dovecot.index: Lost log for seq=1009 offset=40: Missing middle file seq=1009 (between 1009..4294967295) Jul 14
2007 Apr 26
1
Rules for running SWIG
With the new "stamp" rules for running SWIG, things don't seem to get rebuilt when I expect them to, e.g.: olly at ixion:~/svn/xapian/xapian-bindings/python $ make modern/xapian_wrap.cc make: Nothing to be done for `modern/xapian_wrap.cc'. olly at ixion:~/svn/xapian/xapian-bindings/python $ ls -l modern/xapian_wrap.cc ls: modern/xapian_wrap.cc: No such file or directory Problem
2007 Feb 12
1
Build problems
I'm getting remotetest and apitest failing for me on ixion on SVN HEAD-ish. I can't find a link to tinderbox anywhere obvious (I expected it to be linked from bleeding edge, and possibly the bugzilla start page), so I don't know if it's something dumb I've done to my setup and checkout, or a genuine problem. Any ideas? J --
2005 Feb 16
2
Subversion?
I've been wondering if we should consider migrating from CVS to Subversion (aka SVN) for version control. There's a utility (cvs2svn) to convert a CVS repository while keeping full history. And SVN is supported by viewcvs (as used by http://cvs.xapian.org/) The main motivations are: * CVS doesn't really handle renaming files well. Either you "cvs rm" then "cvs
2006 Jul 06
1
Re: [XapianBug 84] Enquire_set_sort_by_value() and friends have no effect
ah, that explains it ... sorry to waste your time, im going to go sit in the corner for a while now :p is there a reason you have no numeric sort function? cheers alec bugzilla-daemon at ixion.tartarus.org wrote: > http://www.xapian.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84 > > olly at survex.com changed: > > What |Removed |Added >
2007 Jul 21
0
Website
I've had to move the website onto a different partition on ixion. It should all be running happily off the new one, and existing scripts etc. should work fine. Let me know if there are any problems. J -- /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ James Aylett xapian.org james at tartarus.org
2016 Jul 08
0
[PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 01:45:58PM -0400, Craig Gallek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all: > > > > This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to > > eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The > > conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb
2007 Apr 05
2
Re: [XapianBug 117] Invalid data in remote protocol can cause buffer overflow
bugzilla-daemon@ixion.tartarus.org wrote: > http://www.xapian.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117 > > ------- Additional Comments From olly@survex.com 2007-04-05 13:52 ------- > I've actually already implemented a fix. If bugzilla stops sending me mail, I > might even manage to check it in soon! Sorry Olly - just about finished sorting things out now! For everyone
2016 Jul 06
3
[PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi all: > > This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to > eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The > conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use > it instead of sk_receive_queue. I'm seeing the splat below after
2016 Jul 06
3
[PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi all: > > This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to > eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The > conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use > it instead of sk_receive_queue. I'm seeing the splat below after
2006 Jan 03
2
Debian Package Installation
Hi: I've successfully installed Xapian under Ubuntu Linux using APT but when I tried it on an older Debian machine I got a broken package error: ------------------------------------------ # apt-get install libxapian8 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are