similar to: two lots of dovecot files

hello, do you mind if I ask before I start poking about ? suddenly I notice that gmail is ignoring or because there is an error getmail is not sending the delete request. Mails are sent and received but not deleted gmail so I keep getting them. mick at rapunzel:~/.getmail$ getmail --rcfile getmailrc1 Delivery error (command deliver 1363 wrote to stderr: lda(mick,)Error:

On 2018-12-01 14:35, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 01 December 2018 at 12:09 mick crane <mc at mickiwiki.com> wrote: >> >> >> hello, >> do you mind if I ask before I start poking about ? >> suddenly I notice that gmail is ignoring or because there is an error >> getmail is not sending the delete request. >> Mails are sent and received but not

On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 16:35:19 +0200 (EET) Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 01 December 2018 at 12:09 mick crane <mc at mickiwiki.com> wrote: > > getmail is not sending the delete request. > > Mails are sent and received but not deleted gmail so I keep getting > > them. > > > > mick at rapunzel:~/.getmail$ getmail --rcfile getmailrc1 > > Delivery error

Excuse dopey question. I'm not exactly clear about certificates. Apache2 default install has this snake oil certificate Can make a new one for apache Can make one for dovecot Can make one for ssl Is there supposed to be the one (self signed ) certificate pair in one place for the machine that each process hands out ? Can they be moved to another machine ? mick -- Key ID C7D6E24C

> On 01 December 2018 at 12:09 mick crane <mc at mickiwiki.com> wrote: > > > hello, > do you mind if I ask before I start poking about ? > suddenly I notice that gmail is ignoring or because there is an error > getmail is not sending the delete request. > Mails are sent and received but not deleted gmail so I keep getting > them. > > mick at

On 03/28/2016 05:05 PM, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > >> On March 28, 2016 at 5:43 PM Phil Lello <phil at dunlop-lello.uk> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm considering migrating away from gmail for my (one-man) company, and I'm >> trying to decide if dovecot is the right option (I'm committed to >> self-hosting). I'm a

Le 15 oct. 2016 ? 9:56, mick crane <mick.crane at gmail.com> a ?crit: > I assume this means there are no emails in the INBOX. > send yourself a mail. This is actually one of the first thing I tried when I saw outgoing mails worked. I also tried sending mails from another address, hoping to receive an error message back, but nothing got received. I now think the INBOX itself doesn?t

Le 14 oct. 2016 ? 16:06, mick crane <mick.crane at gmail.com> a ?crit: > On 2016-10-14 13:43, Moi wrote: >> Hello, >> First of all, I'm sorry if you received this mail twice; I haven't received >> it the first time so I think it was lost. Second attempt. >> I've made some more tests and I still can't receive mails. >> Outlook doesn't

Am Montag, den 04.03.2019, 15:27 +0000 schrieb mick crane via dovecot: > hello > is debian buster > I have 2 sets of dovecot files, I don't know why. > one in /etc/dovecot and one in /usr/share/dovecot > they are not links they are actual files. > if I rename /etc/dovecot and restart service then I get connection > refused when use roundcube. > Some time ago my

Hello, I'm using dovecot 2.3.4.1 on a Debian buster system. with Argon2ID password scheme, it's only possible to configure the parameters used for it via the generic -r option to "doveadm pw". A higher -r will increase time and memory comsumption. But on my dual core VM it always uses p=1. So it seems the needed threads can only be changed on compile time? Will there be in

Hello, First of all, I'm sorry if you received this mail twice; I haven't received it the first time so I think it was lost. Second attempt. I've made some more tests and I still can't receive mails. Outlook doesn't complain about anything, no error message; the mails that are supposed to be received just won't appear. In the mail logs, I find this line (other lines are

On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 12:13:15 +0100 "Guido Goluke, MajorLabel via dovecot" <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > Op 14-03-19 om 11:46 schreef mick crane via dovecot: > > Excuse dopey question. > > I'm not exactly clear about certificates. > > Apache2 default install has this snake oil certificate > > Can make a new one for apache > > Can make one

Is there some reason to use a mail.domain.com cert for mail rarher than just using domain.com for everything? Historically the subdomain were used because they were on different hardware. That is www was on one machine and mail was on another. ? Original Message ? From: dovecot at dovecot.org Sent: March 14, 2019 3:56 PM To: dovecot at dovecot.org Reply-to: jtam.home at gmail.com

Am Donnerstag, den 04.07.2019, 12:27 +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > On 4.7.2019 12.22, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote: > > Hi > > So you're advised to use a solr or something else? > > > > Using any FTS is advisable, currently suitable ones would be SOLR or > Xapian (see https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian) > Hi Aki, I didn't yet

Am Montag, den 22.06.2015, 10:05 +0100 schrieb lejeczek: > > > I wonder could there be some kind of collision between > user/passdbs, even though I do not configure anything but > ldap, when I do: passdb { driver = pam } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/ldap-passdb-my.domain.conf driver = ldap } Check your whole dovecot config. You have an active PAM passdb lookup and an

Am Freitag, den 03.07.2015, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Steinar Bang: > > > fail2ban scans the logs of various services for attacks and firewalls > out the attacking IP addresses. > > There are no built-in rules for exim or dovecot in the debian > fail2ban > package, but there is something here that could possibly be > adapted...? Are you talking about wheezy or jessie?

I have discovered that many times the virus definitions I use for scanning messages (ClamAV, with the unofficial signatures http://sanesecurity.com/usage/linux-scripts/) are updated some time after my server has received an infected email. It seems the virus creators are trying to race the virus definition creators to see who can deliver first; more than half of the infected messages are found

On 15/06/2015 17:46, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 14.06.2015, 10:46 +0100 schrieb Mark: >> Since upgrading to Debian Wheezy > ... >> # 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf >> # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-kirkwood armv5tel Debian 7.8 > > So it's dovecot from the backports. > Didn't you notice that since about 2 months there's now jessie out? I did.

Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 13:33 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura: > I think I have it now! Found info about *correctly* defining > namespaces. I now get the following when telnetting in, and it all > looks valid. > > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to 127.0.0.1. > Escape character is '^]'. > * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE >

Hi, I use Debian jessie with Dovecot 2.2.13-11. While writing a script for Horde to change the passwords in my passwd file I noticed doveadm pw -t fails for SHA512-CRYPT: # doveadm pw -s SHA1 -p test {SHA1}qUqP5cyxm6YcTAhz05Hph5gvu9M= # doveadm pw -t {SHA1}qUqP5cyxm6YcTAhz05Hph5gvu9M= -p test {SHA1}qUqP5cyxm6YcTAhz05Hph5gvu9M= (verified) # doveadm pw -s SHA512-CRYPT -p test