similar to: Virtual mailbox shows mails that are too old

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Virtual mailbox shows mails that are too old"

2019 Feb 19
0
Virtual mailbox shows mails that are too old
<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> Hi, this is a known issue unfortunately. You can try do doveadm index -u victim 'Virtual/*' </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Aki </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 19
2017 Aug 07
2
Virtual mailboxes, index update issues
Hello, I noticed a strange behavor, where I would like to ask for help. I have set up a few virtual mailboxes using the Virtual plugin. These mailboxes are: - Unread (all undread in all mailboxes) - LastDay (last 24h of all mailboxes) - LastWeek (last 7 days of all mailboxes) ... The virtual mailboxes in general are working great. However, there is one annoying behavior I would like to fix.
2009 Jul 19
3
Opensolaris domU unable to get dhcp lease
I''m running a ubuntu 9.04 64 bit dom0 with kernel 2.6.29.6 and xen 3.4.0. My eth0 is bridged to br0 and to my guest VMs. The dom0 is running a dhcp server on br0 which is able to provide leases to physical machines on eth0, and also to a windows xp domU which is bridged to br0. However my open solaris 2009.6 domU is unable to obtain a dhcp lease. On the opensolaris side I can see this:
2017 Aug 15
4
v2.2.32 release candidate released
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz.sig There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated * imapc: Info-level
2017 Aug 15
4
v2.2.32 release candidate released
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz.sig There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated * imapc: Info-level
2017 Jul 17
3
A bug related with undef value when bootstrap MemorySSA.cpp
It seems MemorySSA.cpp is the only real code where we found the problem happening. Is it possible to change the source of MemorySSA.cpp to hide the problem and buy some time for now? Now we use an empty generic_def_path_iterator with Optional<ListIndex> N being initialized by None as the end of range. Can we initialize the Optional var with a special value instead of None?
2017 Aug 16
1
v2.2.32 release candidate released
Timo Sirainen wrote: > There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: > 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks > 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated Thanks for these changes! Big win for my setup. My servers are not overly stressed, but how much performance
2017 Aug 16
1
v2.2.32 release candidate released
On 16 Aug 2017, at 8.37, Alexey Asemov (Alex/AT) <lists at alex-at.ru> wrote: > > Hello Timo, > > I am quite eager to test it, but I don't know if these changes can be applicable for my configuration (it is shared storage one, any mdbox on NFS can be accessed by multiple servers, I made it so it's mostly accessed by one, but at certain conditions multiple servers still
2017 Sep 15
2
lazy_expunge doesn't work since upgrade 2.2.30 to 2.2.32
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Harald Leithner <leithner at itronic.at> wrote: > Any idea why this doesn't setup work anymore in 2.2.32? > > thx > > Harald > > I just ran into the same thing myself. For me, when I added this to the "location" in the expunged namespace, it started working again: ...:LISTINDEX=expunged.list.index I can't tell you why
2017 Jul 17
3
A bug related with undef value when bootstrap MemorySSA.cpp
Hi, On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote: >> >> It seems MemorySSA.cpp is the only real code where we found the >> problem happening. > > > This is doubtful, ¸FWIW :) > >> >> Is it possible to change the
2018 May 23
3
lazy_expunge ...
So I decided to configure this plugin and take it for a test drive .. configured using mdbox (main namespace is Maildir) .. So as per Wiki have the following namespaces defined ... location is held within db ... but basically Maildir:~/Maildir for inbox namespace ==== 8< =============== namespace inbox { list = yes type = private inbox = yes prefix = INBOX/ separator = /
2017 Aug 24
1
v2.2.32 released
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz.sig Two more fixes since rc2. And repeating: There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are
2017 Aug 24
1
v2.2.32 released
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz.sig Two more fixes since rc2. And repeating: There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are
2017 Sep 18
1
lazy_expunge doesn't work since upgrade 2.2.30 to 2.2.32
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Harald Leithner <leithner at itronic.at> wrote: > Am 2017-09-15 21:25, schrieb Mark Moseley: > >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Harald Leithner <leithner at itronic.at> >> wrote: >> >> Any idea why this doesn't setup work anymore in 2.2.32? >>> >>> thx >>> >>> Harald >>>
2018 May 23
2
lazy_expunge ...
deeper still looks like culprit was fts_enforced = "no" which i removed given default anyway .. still get error [root at stargate dovecot.rawlog]# doveadm search -u matt at the-bryants.net mailbox .EXPUNGED/* from noreply at apress.com doveadm(matt at the-bryants.net): Error: fts: Failed to sync mailbox .EXPUNGED: Mailbox doesn't exist: .EXPUNGED 6156a416748c035b5c0b0000ef794dd1
2017 Jul 18
2
A bug related with undef value when bootstrap MemorySSA.cpp
On 07/18/2017 06:03 PM, David Majnemer via llvm-dev wrote: > I doubt it is possible for us to try and make any fix which is > predicated on eagerly treating undef in a particular way, refinement > will always cause these problems to come about... > > Given what I've seen in LLVM (and what I've learned from other > compilers), we probably have two choices: > 1.
2018 May 23
1
lazy_expunge ...
You should probably exclude the .DUMPSTER folder from quota and FTS plugin { fts_autoindex_exclude = .DUMPSTER quota_ruleN = .DUMPSTER:ignore } Aki On 23.05.2018 13:29, Matt Bryant wrote: > So digging a little deeper it seems this maybe an issue between > fts/fts_lucene and lazy_expunge .. if I disable the fts plugin > > [root at stargate dovecot.rawlog]#? doveadm search -u >
2018 Jun 22
1
lazy expunge folder delete bug
There's a bug in "folder delete" for lazy expunge, type "1 namespace", as descibed on https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge When trying to delete a mailbox that still has messages in it, but that has no EXPUNGED/<name> counterpart, the process hangs after the imap "DELETE" command, and the following appears in the log file after a 60s timeout: Jun
2017 Jul 18
4
A bug related with undef value when bootstrap MemorySSA.cpp
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Sanjoy Das > <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Wei Mi
2017 Aug 08
0
Virtual mailboxes, index update issues
On 07.08.2017 20:28, Stefan Hagen wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed a strange behavor, where I would like to ask for help. > > I have set up a few virtual mailboxes using the Virtual plugin. > These mailboxes are: > - Unread (all undread in all mailboxes) > - LastDay (last 24h of all mailboxes) > - LastWeek (last 7 days of all mailboxes) > ... > > The virtual