similar to: Multi-dbox storage space

> > On 03 Feb 2019, at 22:07, MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net> wrote: > > Hi, I originally picked mdbox because I had the impression from reading about it on the mailing list that it was more performant and that it would conserve disc space. > > But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double the storage as reported. I mean, IMAP QUOTA reports around 900MB for one account

On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: > Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >> >>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created >> and >>>> subscribed for them. >>>> >>>> Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace >> inbox"

PowerDNS supports CAA records beginning with version 4.0, but the pdns package in EPEL for most recent centos versions is stuck at around version 3.4 (3.4.11 is what I have). Do I have no other choice but to manually compile and maintain my own pdns installation? I prefer to avoid this but I need up-to-date features. Perhaps there is a PowerDNS specific work-around? Maybe the EPEL

On 2017-03-13 19:31, MRob wrote: > On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote: >> On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: >>> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >>>> >>>>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created >>>> and >>>>>> subscribed for them.

I know there's a couple third party repos offering PHP 7 for Centos. I prefer not to add too much third party that I don't have to and PHP 7 has been mainstream for some time now, I thought maybe it would be in EPEL by now. What is the most recommended and stable way to get an up to date PHP on Centos 7?

>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created and >> subscribed for them. >> >> Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace inbox" >> containing the needed mailbox definitions in the userdb lookup for >> such users? If so, how would the userdb lookup result be formatted? >> Presumably as > >

On 14.03.2017 05:57, MRob wrote: > On 2017-03-13 13:40, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 2017-03-13 19:31, MRob wrote: >>> On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote: >>>> On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: >>>>> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have a need for

on centos 7 I tried to install banshee from EPEL yum install banshee gotting this error: Error: Package: banshee-2.6.2-11.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgpod-sharp >= 0.8.2 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest seems known problem but ignored to fix it in a year or more:

How can I query the current pigeonhole version from a running instance to verify it is what I expect? Possible to get `dovecot --version` to show things like that?

On 2016-10-25 06:51, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 25.10.2016 09:43, mrobti at insiberia.net wrote: >> I have inherited a 10+ GB mailbox which dsync converted to maildir >> very nicely. But 15GB in tens of thousands of messages is too much in >> one INBOX when used in webmail. >> >> I guess it's best to divide the messages into subfolders for date. >> >>

I have inherited a 10+ GB mailbox which dsync converted to maildir very nicely. But 15GB in tens of thousands of messages is too much in one INBOX when used in webmail. I guess it's best to divide the messages into subfolders for date. Is there a server-side way to safely move messages into new subfolders so that Dovecot indexes and UIDs won't break? If I write a shell script to move

The Dovecot wiki [1] doesn't list either Exim, Postfix or anything else as supporting the dbox. I did some searching in the Exim archives and have found only one message mentioning dbox, sdbox or mdbox. [2] I think an RFC would go a long way towards getting the format supported. Has Timo, or anyone else, considered submitting an RFC to the IETF? My question was how are we going to use it

Hello, Thank you, yes I have, it's not answering my questions. Thanks. Dave. On 5/28/19, Ralph Seichter via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > * David Mehler: > >> Are there any performance or stability advantages Sdbox over Maildir? > > Have you read the documentation at all? > > -Ralph >

Hello. I'm install latest dovecot 1.2 from hg repo. I have many messages in maildir+ format. I migrate some folders to dbxo format using instructions from http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox. But in two folders i'm delete index.cache and index.log files, this is my mistake. Is that possible to recover this files (regenerate) or use my messages from maildir with dbox? Thank You for

On 29.5.2019 8.17, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > Are you sure you read > it??https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox?seems pretty clear. > > --? > This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. David, in particular, is there some question you feel that the wiki fails to answer? Aki

On 2017-03-13 13:40, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 2017-03-13 19:31, MRob wrote: >> On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote: >>> On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: >>>> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >>>>> >>>>>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder

Hi Philon, Thanks a lot for your thoughts! Can I ask you if using Solr improved things for you? I have a mailbox with 15 years of e-mail and searching things take a long time. On 04.02.2020 09:39, Philon wrote: > Hi Francis, > > next to fts-solr there was fts-lucene. But that Lucene there seems > heavily outdated why the Dovecot docs also suggest using Solr. > Elasticsearch

On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote: > On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: >> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >>> >>>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created >>> and >>>>> subscribed for them. >>>>> >>>>> Is is possible to return an

Hi Looking for some insight into mdbox index file management and recovery from corruptions. I have a two node cluster on NFS with proxy director in front for user stickness. One node (a nominated master) bidirectionally replicates to a 3rd node on a DR site. We periodically get index file corruptions resulting in rebuilds. However the user experience is poor as messages read/deleted from

Hi gluster users, I've spent several months trying to get any kind of high performance out of gluster. The current XFS/samba array is used for video editing and 300-400MB/s for at least 4 clients is minimum (currently a single windows client gets at least 700/700 for a single client over samba, peaking to 950 at times using blackmagic speed test). Gluster has been getting me as low as